Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Generierung von Sätzen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Die Natur der Sprache

Zusammenfassung

Obwohl Bildgebungsverfahren und elektrophysiologische Methoden eine genauere Bestimmung der mit der Satzverarbeitung verbundenen neuronalen Korrelate ermöglichen, gibt es methodologische Probleme, die bei der Interpretation von Studienergebnissen zu berücksichtigen sind. Einige kritische Faktoren beziehen sich auf die zu prüfende Satzstruktur und auf die Anforderungen der Aufgabenstellung. Zudem spielen bei der Satzverarbeitung Funktionen des Arbeitsspeichers eine wichtige Rolle. Schließlich gibt es auch kritische Argumente gegen die statistische Analyse der mit Bildgebungsverfahren gewonnenen Daten. Wir können jedoch feststellen, dass insbesondere das Broca-Areal (BA 44, 45), der linke supplementär-motorische Cortex und der prämotorische Cortex bei der komplexen Satzverarbeitung beteiligt sind. Diese mentalen Berechnungen involvieren ebenso die Verarbeitung von syntaktischen Dependenzen. Die Ergebnisse zur komplexen syntaktischen Verarbeitung sind mit den Daten kompatibel, die zeigen, dass Arbeitsspeicherfunktionen, einschließlich Rehearsal- Prozessen, verschiedene Regionen im präfrontalen Cortex aktivieren. Die Interpretation von Satzbedeutungen scheint demgegenüber insbesondere den linken (aber manchmal auch den rechten) Gyrus temporalis superior und den Gyrus temporalis medius sowie die parietalen Regionen, einschließlich des Gyrus angularis, zu involvieren.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Amunts, K., Lenzen, M., Friederici, A. D., Schleicher, A., Morosan, P., Palomero-Gallagher, N., & Zilles, K. (2010). Broca’s region: Novel organizational principles and multiple receptor mapping. PLoS Biology, 8(9). doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000489.

  • Anwander, A., Tittgemeyer, M., von Cramon, D. Y., Friederici, A. D., & Knösche, T. R. (2007). Connectivity-Based Parcellation of Broca’s Area. Cerebral Cortex, 17(4), 816–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assadollahi, R., & Rockstroh, B. S. (2008). Representation of the verb’s argument-structure in the human brain. BMC Neuroscience, 9, 69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Shachar, M., Palti, D., & Grodzinsky, Y. (2004). Neural correlates of syntactic movement: converging evidence from two fMRI experiments. NeuroImage, 21(4), 1320–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilenko, N. Y., Grindrod, C. M., Myers, E. B., & Blumstein, S. E. (2009). Neural correlates of semantic competition during processing of ambiguous words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(5), 960–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, J. R., Frost, J. A., Hammeke, T. A., Cox, R. W., Rao, S. M., & Prieto, T. (1997). Human brain language areas identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17(1), 353–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookheimer, S. (2002). Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annual Review Neuroscience, 25, 151–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brysbaert, M., & Mitchell, D. C. (1996). Modifier attachment in sentence processing: Evidence from Dutch. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 664–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, M. (2001). The role of inferior frontal cortex in phonological processing. Cognitive Science, 25, 695–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capeza, R., & Nyberg, L. (2000). Neural bases of learning and memory: functional neuroimaging evidence. Current Opinion in Neurology, 4, 415–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, D., Chen, E., & Waters, G. (2008). Task-dependent and task-independent neurovascular responses to syntactic processing. Cortex, 44(3), 257–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, D., Alpert, N., & Waters, G. (1998). Effects of syntactic structure and propositional number on patterns of regional cerebral blood flow. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(4), 541–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chein, J. M., Ravizza, S. M., & Fiez, J. A. (2003). Using neuroimaging to evaluate models of working memory and their implications for language processing. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16(4–5), 315–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, E., West, W. C., Waters, G., & Caplan, D. (2006). Determinants of bold signal correlates of processing object-extracted relative clauses. Cortex, 42(4), 591–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen D. (1968). Magnetoencephalography: Evidence of magnetic fields produced by alpha rhythm currents. Science, 161, 784–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuetos, F., & Mitchell, D. C. (1988). Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: restrictions on the use of the Late Closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition, 30(1), 73–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dapretto, M., & Bookheimer, S. Y. (1999). Form and content: dissociating syntax and semantics in sentence comprehension. Neuron, 24, 427–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demb, J. B., Desmond, J. E., Wagner, A. D., Vaidya, C. J., Glover, G. H., & Gabrieli, J. D. (1995). Semantic encoding and retrieval in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: a functional MRI study of task difficulty and process specificity. The Journal of Neuroscience, 15(9), 5870–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Démonet, J.-F., Chollet, F., Ramsay, S., Cardebat, D., Nespoulous, J.-L., Wise, R., Rascol, A., & Frackowiak, R. (1992). The anatomy of phonological and semantic processing in normal subjects. Brain, 115(6), 1753–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmet, T., De, B. C., & Brysbaert, M. (2002). The influence of referential discourse context on modifier attachment in Dutch. Memory & Cognition, 30(1), 150–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devauchelle, A.-D., Oppenheim, C., Rizzi, L., Dehaene, S., & Pallier, C. (2009). Sentence syntax and content in the human temporal lobe: an fMRI adaptation study in auditory and visual modalities. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(5), 1000–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dronkers, N. F., Wilkins, D. P., Redfem, B. B., Van Valin, J. R., & Jaeger, J. J. (1994). A reconsideration of the brain areas involved in the disruption of morphosyntactic comprehension. Brain and Language, 47, 461–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embick, D., Marantz, A., Miyashita, Y., O’Neil, W., & Sakai, K. L. (2000). A syntactic specialization in Broca’s area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 97(11), 65150–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felser, C., Marinis, T., & Clahsen, H. (2003). Children’s processing of ambiguous sentences: A study of relative clause attachment. Language Acquisition, 11(3), 127–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiebach, C. J., & Schubotz, R. I. (2006). Dynamic anticipatory processing of hierarchical sequential events: a common role for Broca’s area and ventral premotor cortex across domains? Cortex, 42(4), 499–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiez, J. A. (1997). Phonology, semantics, and the role of the left inferior prefrontal cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 5(2), 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. (1983). A method for obtaining measures of local parsing complexity throughout sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(2), 203–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6, 291–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (1997). Construal: Overview, motivation, and some new evidence. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26(3), 277–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L. (1979). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L. (1987). Structure in auditory word recognition. Cognition, 25(1–2), 416–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrieli, J. D. E., Desmond, J. E., Demb, J. B., Wagner, A. D., Stone, M. V., Vaidya, C. J., & Glover, G. H. (1996). Functional magnetic resonance imaging of semantic memory processes in the frontal lobes. Psychological Science, 7(5), 278–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E. (1998). Syntactic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodglass, H. (1993). Understanding aphasia. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herdener, M., Humbel, T., Esposito, F., Habermeyer, B., Cattapan-Ludewig, K., & Seifritz, E. (2012). Jazz drummers recruit language-specific areas for the processing of rhythmic structure. Cerebral Cortex (ePrint Nov. 25).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillert, D., & Buračas, G. (2009). The neural substrates of spoken idiom comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(9), 1370–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillert, D. (1990). Sprachprozesse und Wissensstrukturen: Neuropsychologische Grundlagen der Kognition [German]. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillert, D. (ed. 1994). Linguistics and cognitive neuroscience. Linguistische Berichte, Special Issue 4. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, V. N., & O’Regan, J. K. (1981). Eye fixation patterns during the reading of relative clause sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 417–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286, 2526–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., Keller, T. A., Eddy, W. F., & Thulborn, K. R. (1996). Brain activation modulated by sentence comprehension. Science, 274(5284), 114–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J., & Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 580–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, A. M., Constable, R. T., Gore, J. C., & Avrutin, S. (1999). An event-related fMRI study of implicit phrase-level syntactic and semantic processing. Neuroimage, 10(5), 555–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, J. (1973). Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language. Cognition, 2, 15–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makuuchi, M., Bahlmann, J., Anwander, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2007). Segregating the core computational faculty of human language from working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 106(20), 8362–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazoyer, B. M., Tzourio, N., Frak, V., Syrota, A., Murayama, N., Levrier, O., Salamon, G., Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., & Mehler, J. (1993). The cortical representation of speech. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(4), 467–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, J. A., McArdle, J. J., Schafer, R. J., & Braun, A. R. (2010). Neural Aspects of Sentence Comprehension: Syntactic Complexity, Reversibility, and Reanalysis. Cerebral Cortex, 20(8), 1853–1864. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp249.

  • Meyer, M., Friederici, A. D., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2000). Neurocognition of auditory sentence comprehension: event related fMRI reveals sensitivity to syntactic violations and task demands. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 9(1), 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, L., Obleser, J., & Friederici, A. D. (2013). Left parietal alpha enhancement during working memory-intensive sentence processing. Cortex, 49(3), 711–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., & Chomsky, N. (1963). Finitary models of language users’. In R. D. Luce,,R. R. Bush & E. Galanter (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, (vol. II). New York, NY: Wiley: 419–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moro, A., Tettamanti, M., Perani, D., Donati, C., Cappa, S. F., & Fazio F. (2001). Syntax and the brain: disentangling grammar by selective anomalies. NeuroImage, 13(1), 110–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musso, M., Moro, A., Glauche, V., Rijntjes, M., Reichenbach, J., Buechel, C., & Weiller, C. (2003). Broca’s area and the language instinct. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 774–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, S. D., Just, M. A., Keller, T. A., Roth, J., & Carpenter, P. A. (2003). Differential effects of syntactic and semantic processing on the subregions of Broca’s area. Cognitive Brain Research, 16(2), 297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, J., & Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18(1), 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obleser, J., & Kotz, S. A. (2010). Expectancy constraints in degraded speech modulate the language comprehension network. Cerebral Cortex, 20(3), 633–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13(1), 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prabhakaran, V., Narayanan, K., Zhao, Z., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2000). Integration of diverse information in working memory within the frontal lobe. Nature Neuroscience, 3(1), 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, C. J. (2010). The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191, 62–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, F. M., Thomas, M. S. C., & Price, C. J. (2010). Neuronal activation for semantically reversible sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(6), 1283–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogalsky, C., & Hickok, G. (2009). Selective attention to semantic and syntactic features modulates sentence processing networks in anterior temporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 19(4), 786–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J. (1998). Neuroimaging analyses of human working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 95(20), 12061–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromswold, K., Caplan, D., Alpert, N., & Rauch, S. (1996). Localization of syntactic comprehension by positron emission tomography. Brain and Language, 52(3), 452–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tettamanti, M., Rotondi, I., Perani, D., Scotti, G., Fazio, F., Cappa, S. F., & Moro, A. (2009). Syntax without language: neurobiological evidence for cross-domain syntactic computations. Cortex, 45(7), 825–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. K., Bonakdarpour, B., Fix, S. C., Blumenfeld, H. K., Parrish, T. B., Gitelman, D. R., & Mesulam, M.-M. (2007). Neural correlates of verb argument structure processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(11), 1753–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson-Schill, S. L., D’Esposito, M., Aguirre, G. K., & Farah, M. J. (1997). Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94(26), 14792–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, L. K., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Randall, B., Wright, P., Devereux, B. J., Zhuang, J., Papoutsi, M., & Stamatakis, E. A. (2011). Left inferior frontal cortex and syntax: function, structure and behaviour in patients with left hemisphere damage. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 134(2), 415–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vul, E., Harris, C., Winkielman, P., & Pashler, H. (2009). Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social sognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(3), 274–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, E., & Maratsos, M. (1978). An ATN approach in comprehension. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan & G. Miller (eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 119–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weckerly, J., & Kutas, M. (1999). An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences. Psychophysiology, 36(5), 559–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagar, D., Pynte, J., & Rativeau, S. (1997). Evidence for early closure attachment on first-pass reading times in French. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 421–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA

    Dieter Hillert

Authors
  1. Dieter Hillert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dieter Hillert .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hillert, D. (2018). Generierung von Sätzen. In: Die Natur der Sprache. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20113-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20113-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-20112-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-20113-5

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation