Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Super-Science, Fundamental Dimension, Way of Being: Library and Information Science in an Age of Messages

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Information Cultures in the Digital Age

Abstract

This paper examines some conceptual issues for library and information science (LIS), with a focus on how they have been treated in the scholarship of Rafael Capurro, based on a selective literature analysis. Three topics are examined. First, the concept of information is considered, with particular reference on the value of theoretical approaches for LIS, and with emphasis on a comparison of Capurro’s approach with those of Popper and of Floridi. Second, the nature of the information-centric disciplines is considered, with particular reference to Capurro’s conception of a conjoined LIS discipline, rooted in the humanities. Third, Capurro’s ideas of digital ontology and digital hermeneutics are outlined, with emphasis on their value in providing a theoretical background for studying the new generation of immersive multisensory documents. It is concluded that the kind of rigorous study of foundational issues which characterises Capurro’s work will be of even greater importance for the LIS discipline in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbott, R. (2004). Subjectivity as a concern for information science: A Popperian perspective. Journal of Information Science, 30(2), 95-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, M. J. (2005). Information and knowledge: An evolutionary framework for information. Information Research, 10(4), paper 239. http://informationr.net/ir/10-4/paper239.html

  • Bates, M. J. (2006). Fundamental forms of information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 1033-1045.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawden, D. (2001). The shifting terminologies of information. Aslib Proceedings, 2001, 53(3), 93-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawden, D. (2002). The three worlds of health information. Journal of Information Science, 28(1), 51-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawden, D. (2007). Organised complexity, meaning and understanding: An approach to a unified view of information for information science. Aslib Proceedings, 2007, 59(4/5), 307-327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2010). Pharmaceutical information: A 30-year perspective on the literature. Annual Reviews of Information Science and Technology, 2010, 45, 63-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2012). Introduction to information science. London, United Kingdom: Facet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2015a). “A few exciting words”: Information and entropy revisited. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(10), 1965-1987. doi: 10.1002/asi.23459

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2015b). “Waiting for Carnot”: Information and complexity. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(11), 2177–2186. doi: 10.1002/asi.23535

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2016). Library and information science. In K.B. Jensen & R.T. Craig (Eds.), International encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy. New York, NY: Wiley. Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H. (1968). Information science: What is it? American Documentation, 19(1), 3-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brier, S. (2008). Cybersemiotics: Why information is not enough. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brier, S. (2013). The transdisciplinary view of information theory from a cybersemiotic perspective. In F. Ibekwe-SanJuan & T. Dousa, (Eds.), Theories of information, communication and knowledge: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 23-49). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, B.C. (1980). The foundations of information science. Part 1: Philosophical aspects. Journal of Information Science, 2(3/4), 125-133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, M. (1991). Information as thing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 351-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, M. (2012). What kind of science can information science be? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 1-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capurro, R. (1985). Moral issues of information science. Journal of Information Science, 11(3), 113-123. http://www.capurro.de/moral.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Capurro, R. (1992). What is information science for? A philosophical reflection. In P. Vakkari & B. Cronin (Eds.), Conceptions of library and information science: Historical, empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 82-93). London, United Kingdom: Taylor Graham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capurro, R. (1999). Beyond the digital. Paper presented at VIPER99 (International Festival for Film Video and New Media Symposium), Lucerne, October 1999. http://www.capurro.de/viper.html

  • Capurro, R. (2008a). On Floridi’s metaphysical foundation of information ecology. Ethics and Information Technology, 10(2/3), 167-173. http://www.capurro.de/floridi.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Capurro, R. (2008b). Intercultural information ethics. In K. E. Himma & H. T. Tavani, (Eds.), Handbook of information and computer ethics (pp. 639-665). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capurro, R. (2009). Past, present and future of the concept of information. tripleC: Cognition, Communication, Co-operation, 7(2), 125-141. http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/113/116

    Google Scholar 

  • Capurro, R. (2010). Digital hermeneutics: An outline. AI and Society, 25(1), 35-42. http://www.capurro.de/digitalhermeneutics.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Capurro, R., Fleissner, P., & Hofkirchner, W. (1999). Is a unified theory of information feasible? In W. Hofkirchner (Ed.), The quest for a unified theory of information. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Foundations of Information Science (pp. 9-30). Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge. http://www.capurro.de/trialog.html

  • Capurro, R., & Hjørland, B. (2003). The concept of information. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 343-411. http://www.capurro.de/infoconcept.html

  • Compton, B. W. (2015). Parallax ontology and the philosophy of information. Library Trends, 63(3), 555-573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B., & Meho, L. I. (2009). Receiving the French: A bibliometric snapshot of the impact of “French theory” on information studies. Journal of Information Science, 35(4), 398-413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C. H., & Shaw, D. (Eds.) (2011). Introduction to information science and technology. Medford, NJ: Information Today.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, R. E. (2005). Poststructuralism and information studies. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 39, 575-609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz Nafría, J. M. (2010). What is information? A multidimensional concern. tripleC: Cognition, Communication, Co-operation, 8(1), 77-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, A. (2007). LIS as a research domain: Problems and prospects. Information Research, 12(4). http://InformationR.net/ir/12-4/colis/colis03.html

  • Dineen, J. D., & Brauner, C. (2015). Practical and philosophical considerations for defining Information as well-formed, meaningful data in the information sciences. Library Trends, 63(3), 378-400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, A. S. (1997). Some post-war models of the information chain. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 29(4), 179-187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (1999). Information ethics: On the philosophical foundation of computer ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 1(1), 37-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (2002). On defining library and information science as applied philosophy of information. Social Epistemology, 16(1), 37-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (2008). Information ethics: A reappraisal. Ethics and Information Technology, 10(2/3), 189-204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (2010). Information: A very short introduction. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (2011). The philosophy of information. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (2013). The ethics of information. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is shaping human reality. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frické, M (2009). The knowledge pyramid: A critique of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 35(2), 131-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furner, J. (2004). Information studies without information. Library Trends, 52(3), 427-446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furner, J. (2010). Philosophy and information studies. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44, 161-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furner, J. (2013). Information without information studies. In F. Ibekwe-SanJuan & T. Dousa, (Eds.), Theories of information, communication and knowledge: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 143-179). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furner, J. (2015). Information science is neither. Library Trends, 63(3), 362-377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjørland, B. (2007). Information: Objective or subjective/situational? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(10), 1448-1456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjørland, B. (2008). The controversy over the concept of “information”: A rejoinder to Professor Bates. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugya, F. K. (2013). What counts as a science and discipline in library and information science? Library Review, 63(1/2), 138-155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L. (2012). Meanings of information: The assumptions and research consequences of three foundational LIS theories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(40), 716-723.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKechnie, L. E. F., Serantes, L. C., & Hoffman, C. (2012). Dancing around the edges: The use of postmodern approaches in information behaviour research as evident in the published proceedings of the biennial ISIC conferences, 1996-2010. Information Research, 17(4), paper 548. http://www.informationr.net/ir/17-4/paper548.html

  • Neill S. D. (1982). Brookes, Popper and objective knowledge. Journal of Information Science 4(1), 33-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notturno, M. A. (2002). On Popper, London, United Kingdom: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1979). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach (revised edition). Oxford, United Kingdom: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randles, T. J., Blades, C. D., Fadlalla, A. (2012). The knowledge spectrum. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(2), 65-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, L. (2009). Information science: Communication chain and domain analysis. Journal of Documentation, 65(4), 578-591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, L. (2015a). Beyond the word: The future of documents. Paper presented at INFORUM2015, Prague, May 2015. Online proceedings. http://www.inforum.cz/pdf/2015/robinson-lyn-1.pdf

  • Robinson, L. (2015b). Multisensory, pervasive, immersive: Towards a new generation of documents. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(4), 1734-1737. doi:10.1002/asi.23328

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, L. (2015c). Immersive information behaviour: Using the documents of the future. New Library World, 116(3/4), 112-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, L., & Bawden, D. (2013). Mind the gap: Transitions between concepts of information in varied domains. In F. Ibekwe-SanJuan & T. Dousa, (Eds.), Theories of information, communication and knowledge: A multidisciplinary approach, (pp. 121-141). Dordrecht; The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, J. (2007). The wisdom hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 163-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, D. (1983). Do we really need World III? Information science with or without Popper. Journal of Information Science, 7(2/3), 99-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, A. M. (1983). Toward a theory of library and information science. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University. Dissertation Abstracts International, AAT 8401534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, A. M. (1986). The domain of information science: Problems in conceptualisation and in consensus-building. Information Services and Use, 6(5/6), 169-205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Søraker, J. H. (Producer) (2012). Luciano Floridi [audio podcast]. SuchThatCast. http://suchthatcast.com/Floridi

  • Stonier, T. (1990). Information and the internal structure of the universe. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonier, T. (1992). Beyond information: The natural history of intelligence. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonier, T. (1997). Information and meaning: An evolutionary perspective. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treude, L. (2015). Information literacies. Understanding the digital age: A dialogue with Rafael Capurro. In M. E. Q. Gonzalez & J. A. de Moraes (Eds.), Life, information and new technologies, forthcoming. Preprint. http://www.capurro.de/moraes.html

  • Van der Veer Martens, B. (2015). An illustrated introduction to the Infosphere. Library Trends, 63(3), 317-361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburton, N. (2015). An interview with Luciano Floridi on the philosophy of information. http://fivebooks.com/interviews/luciano-floridi-on-philosophy-information/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. London, United Kingdom

    Prof. David Bawden

  2. City University, London, England

    Lyn Robinson

Authors
  1. Prof. David Bawden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lyn Robinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Bawden .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Hobart, Australia

    Matthew Kelly

  2. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

    Jared Bielby

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bawden, D., Robinson, L. (2016). Super-Science, Fundamental Dimension, Way of Being: Library and Information Science in an Age of Messages. In: Kelly, M., Bielby, J. (eds) Information Cultures in the Digital Age. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14681-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation