Abstract
For some time epigenetics has been a focus of increasing public interest. While the sequencing of the human genome was the paramount event in genetics, epigenetic research is focused on mechanisms which regulate genes and on environmental influences on gene expression. Since the appearance of the debate about genetic engineering, genetic data has been considered particularly relevant for an individual’s personality because of their predictive potential coupled with their general invariability, their influence on reproductive decisions, and the significance for likewise affected relatives. Genetic data could be used to create health or personality profiles. Therefore, the individual has a “right to informational self-determination,” which is part of the right of personality. This allows the individual to decide whether and to which extent third persons or institutions should be granted access to one’s personal data. Because genetic information may cause personal harm, e.g., if they reveal the future onset of an incurable disease, the individual has the right to decide not to know his or her genetic status. This so-called “right not to know” is also part of the right of personality. This paper examines the influence that epigenetic information exerts on the right of personality in comparison to that of genetic information and whether a reassessment of the protection of a person’s genetic data, personality, and privacy is required.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bohacek, J., Gapp, K., Saab, B. J., & Mansuy, I. M. (2013). Transgenerational epigenetic effects on brain functions. Biological Psychiatry, 73, 313–320.
Bund-Länder Arbeitsgruppe “Genomanalyse”. (1990). Abschlussbericht, Bundesanzeiger, Nr. 161a, 29 August 1990. Köln: Bundesanzeiger.
Bygren, L. O., Kaati, G., & Edvinsson, S. (2001). Longevity determined by paternal ancestors’ nutrition during their slow growth period. Acta Biotheoretica, 49, 53–59.
Deutscher Bundestag. (2008). Gesetzesentwurf der Bundesregierung, Entwurf eines Gesetzes über genetische Untersuchungen bei Menschen (Gendiagnostikgesetz – GenDG). BT-Drucksache 16/10532.
Deutsch, E., & Spickhoff, A. (2014). Medizinrecht (7th ed.). Berlin: Springer.
Dolinoy, D. C., Weidman, J. R., Waterland, R. A., & Jirtle, R. L. (2006). Maternal genistein alters coat color and protects Avy mouse offspring from obesity by modifying the fetal epigenome. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114, 567–572.
Dreier, H. (2013). Grundgesetz Kommentar, Bd. I, Präambel, Artikel 1 – 19, 3rd edn. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Eberbach, W. H. (2011). Juristische Aspekte einer individualisierten Medizin. Medizinrecht, 29, 757–770.
Francis, D., Diorio, J., Liu, D., & Meaney, M. J. (1999). Non-genomic transmission across generations of maternal behavior in the rat. Science, 286, 1155–1158.
Kern, B.-R. (Ed.). (2012). Gendiagnostikgesetz, Kommentar. Munich: C.H. Beck.
Liu, H., Zhou, Y., Boggs, S. E., Belinsky, S. A., & Liu, J. (2007). Cigarette smoke induces demethylation of prometastatic oncogene synuclein-c in lung cancer cells by downregulation of DNMT3B. Oncogene, 26, 5900–5910.
Mastroeni, D., Grover, A., Delvaux, E., Whiteside, C., Coleman, P. D., & Rogers, J. (2011). Epigenetic mechanisms in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiology of Aging, 32, 1161–1180.
Murken, J., Grimm, T., Holinski-Feder, E., & Zerres, K. (2011). Humangenetik (8th ed.). Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag.
Retzko, K. (2006). Prädiktive Medizin versus ein (Grund-)Recht auf Nichtwissen. Aachen: Shaker Verlag.
Roseboom, T. J., van der Meulen, J. H. P., Osmond, C., Barker, D. J. P., Ravelli, A. C. J., Schroeder-Tanka, J. M., et al. (2000). Coronary heart disease after prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine, 1944–45. Heart, 84, 595–598.
Rothstein, M. A. (2013). Legal and ethical implications of epigenetics. In R. L. Jirtle & F. L. Tyson (Eds.), Environmental epigenomics in health and disease (pp. 297–308). Berlin: Springer.
Simitis, S. (1994). Allgemeine Aspekte des Schutzes genetischer Daten. In: Schweizerisches Institut für Rechtsvergleichung (Eds.) Genanalyse und Persönlichkeitsschutz, Internationales Kolloquium, Lausanne, 14 April 1994 (pp. 107–127). Zürich: Schulthess, Polygraphischer Verlag.
Stadler, S. C. (2012). Beitrag auf der 9. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Vereinten Gesellschaft für Klinische Chemie und Laboratoriumsmedizin (DGKL) 26-29 September 2012 in Mannheim, Diagnostische und therapeutische Möglichkeiten der Epigenetik in der Onkologie. Versicherungsmedizin, 2012, 208–209.
Stephens, K. E., Miaskowski, C. A., Levine, J. D., Pullinger, C. R., & Aouizera, B. E. (2013). Epigenetic regulation and measurement of epigenetic changes. Biological Research for Nursing, 15, 373–381.
Szyf, M. (2009). Dynamisches Epigenom als Vermittler zwischen Umwelt und Genom. Medizinische Genetik, 21, 7–13.
Taupitz, J. (1998). Das Recht auf Nichtwissen. In: Hanau et al. (Eds.), Festschrift für Günther Wiese zum 70. Geburtstag (pp. 583–602). Neuwied u.a.: Luchterhand.
UBA: Umweltbundesamt. (2013). Konzept für eine umweltepidemiologische Geburtskohorte als Beitrag zur gesundheitsbezogenen Umweltbeobachtung des Bundes (GUB). http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/378/publikationen/sonstige_konzept_fffu_eine_umweltepidemiologische_geburtskohorte.pdf. Accessed 22 April 2014.
Veenendaal, M., Painter, R., de Rooij, S., Bossuyt, P., van der Post, J., Gluckman, P., et al. (2013). Transgenerational effects of prenatal exposure to the 1944–45 Dutch famine. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 120, 548–554.
Wellbrock, R. (2003). Datenschutzrechtliche Aspekte des Aufbaus von Biobanken für Forschungszwecke. Medizinrecht, 21, 77–82.
Youngson, N. A., & Whitelaw, E. (2008). Transgenerational epigenetic effects. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 9, 233–257.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fündling, C. (2017). Epigenetics and the Protection of Personality Rights. In: Heil, R., Seitz, S., König, H., Robienski, J. (eds) Epigenetics. Technikzukünfte, Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft / Futures of Technology, Science and Society. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14460-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14460-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-14459-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-14460-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)