Skip to main content

Towards an Intercultural Approach to Social Cohesion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Re-thinking Diversity

Part of the book series: Management – Culture – Interpretation ((MCI))

  • 1038 Accesses

Abstract

Within the fields of urban governance and public policy there has been renewed interest in the effect of increasing ethnic and migrant diversity associated with new migration over the past two decades. A paper published in 2007 by Robert Putnam reignited the debate with the claim that immigration and diversity has a universally negative effect on social cohesion. This paper argued that increasing diversity is associated with weaker social networks and an erosion of trust and reciprocity (Putnam 2007). Most of the empirical studies in Europe that have tested Putnam’s thesis contest these findings and argue that social contact is not weakened by diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amin, A. (2002): Ethnicity and the multicultural city: living with diversity. In: Environment and Planning A, 34, (6), pp. 959–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arneil, B. (2006): Diverse Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Becares, L., Stafford, M., Laurence, J. and Nazroo, J. (2011): Composition, Concentration and Deprivation. In: Urban Studies, 48, (13), pp. 2771–2787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buonfino, A. and Hilder, P. (2006): Neighbouring in contemporary Britain. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, J. (2009): Thinking spatially: towards an everyday understanding of inter-ethnic relations. In: Social & Cultural Geography, 10, (4), pp. 481–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coenders, M., M. Lubbers, and P. Scheepers. (2005) Majorities' attitudes towards minorities: Key findings from the Eurobarometer and the European social survey, summary. Brussels, Belgium. European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, R. and Kearns, A. (2001): Social Cohesion, Social Capital and the Neighbourhood. In: Urban Studies, 38, (12), pp. 2125–2143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gesthuizen, M., van der Meer, T. and Scheepers, P. (2009): Ethnic Diversity and Social Capital in Europe: Tests of Putnam's Thesis in European Countries. In: Scandinavian Political Studies, 32, (2), pp. 121–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gijsberts, M., van der Meer, T. and Dagevos, J. (2011): Hunkering Down in Multi-Ethnic Neighbourhoods? The Effects of Ethnic Diversity on Dimensions of Social Cohesion. In: European Sociological Review (doi: 10.1093/esr/jcr022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1991): The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, M., Reeskens, T., Stolle, D. and Trappers, A. (2009): Ethnic Diversity and Generalized Trust in Europe. In: Comparative Political Studies, 42, (2), pp. 198–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, A., & Forrest, R. (2000): Social cohesion and multilevel urban governance. In: Urban studies, 37(5–6), 995–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (2012): Comment on Meer and Modood. In: Journal of Intercultural Studies, 33, (2), pp. 211–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurence, J. (2011): The Effect of Ethnic Diversity and Community Disadvantage on Social Cohesion: A Multi-Level Analysis of Social Capital and Interethnic Relations in UK Communities. In: European Sociological Review, 27, (1), pp. 70–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lentin, A. (2005): Replacing ‘race’, historicizing ‘culture’ in multiculturalism. In: Patterns of Prejudice, 39(4), 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letki, N. (2008): Does Diversity Erode Social Cohesion? Social Capital and Race in British Neighbourhoods. In: Political Studies, 56, (1), pp. 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levey, G. (2012): Interculturalism vs. multiculturalism: a distinction without a difference? In: Journal of Intercultural Studies, 33, (2), pp. 217–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, L. H. (1998): The public realm: Exploring the city's quintessential social territory. Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, E. (2010): Co-operative streets: Neighbours in the UK. Manchester: Co-operatives UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meer, N. (2014): Key Concepts in Race and Ethnicity. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Meer, N. and Modood, T. (2012): How does Interculturalism Contrast with Multiculturalism? In: Journal of Intercultural Studies, 33, (2), pp. 175–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. and Meer, N. (2012): Rejoinder: Assessing the Divergences on our Readings of Interculturalism and Multiculturalism. In: Journal of Intercultural Studies, 33, (2), pp. 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neal, S., Bennett, K., Cochrane, A., & Mohan, G. (2013): Living multiculture: understanding the new spatial and social relations of ethnicity and multiculture in England. In: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(2), pp. 308–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, G. (2009): Everyday cosmopolitanism and the labour of intercultural community. In: Everyday multiculturalism, pp. 46–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parekh, B. (2000): Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Basingstoke and London: Macmillan Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2007): E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century. The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. In: Scandinavian Political Studies, 30, (2), pp. 137–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R.J. and Groves, W.B. (1989): Community Structure and Crime: Testing Social- Disorganization Theory. In: American Journal of Sociology, 94, (4), pp. 774–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (2012): Together: the rituals, pleasures and politics of cooperation. Yale University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • SHM (2007): Promoting Interaction Between People from Different Ethnic Backgrounds. London: Commission for Racial Equality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe, E. H., & Wallwork, J. (2003): Space invaders: The moral‐spatial order in neighbour dispute discourse. In: British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(4), 551–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonkiss, F. (2003): The Ethics of Indifference. In: International Journal of Cultural Studies, 6, (3), pp. 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, G. (2008): Living with difference: reflections on geographies of encounter. In: Progress in Human Geography, 32(3), 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Eijk, G. (2012): Good Neighbours in Bad Neighbourhoods: Narratives of Dissociation and Practices of Neighbouring in a 'Problem' Place. In: Urban Studies, 49(14), 3009–3026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, B. (2010): Dealing with Urban Diversity: Promises and Challenges of City Life for Intercultural Citizenship. In: Political Theory, 38, (5) ), pp. 631–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. (2007a): New Complexities of Cohesion in Britain: Super-diversity, Transnationalism and civil-integration, London: Commission on Integration and Cohesion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. (2007b): Super-diversity and its implications. In: Ethnic and Racial studies, 30(6), pp. 1024–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. and Wessendorf, S. (2010): The Multiculturalism Backlash: European Discourses, Policies and Practices. Abingdon Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werbner, P. (2012): Multiculturalism from Above and Below: Analysing a Political Discourse. In: Journal of Intercultural Studies, 33, (2), pp. 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessendorf, S. (2010): Commonplace diversity: Social interactions in a super-diverse context. Göttingen: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessendorf, S. (2013): Commonplace diversity and the ‘ethos of mixing’: perceptions of difference in a London neighbourhood. In: Identities, 20(4), pp. 407–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessendorf, S. (2014): Commonplace Diversity: Social Relations in a Super-Diverse Context. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire Bynner .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bynner, C. (2016). Towards an Intercultural Approach to Social Cohesion. In: Re-thinking Diversity. Management – Culture – Interpretation. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11502-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11502-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-11501-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-11502-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics