Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Die Ethik des Präferenz-Managements: Risiko, Werte und Entscheidungen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Schwierigkeiten mit der Moral

  • 3083 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Kapitel werde ich in wenigen Worten die Psychologie des Risikos und einige ihrer Implikationen beschreiben. Dabei werde ich mit einer Untersuchung der Subjektivität beginnen, sowie den Werten, welche in der Definition und Beurteilung von Risiko inbegriffen sind. Ich werde argumentieren, dass es legitime, werte-geladene Sachverhalte gibt, welche den multiplen Dimensionen der öffentlichen Risikowahrnehmung zu Grunde liegen, und diese Werte sind als Risiko- Richtlinien-Entscheidungen (risk-policy decisions) zu erachten.

Aus dem Amerikanischen von Johannes Schwarze.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Cohen, B. L. (1985). Criteria for technology acceptability. Risk Analysis, 5, 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, E. A. C., & Wilson, R. (1982). Risk/Benefit analysis. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covello, V. T., Flamm, W. G., Rodricks, J. V., & Tardiff, R. G. (1983). The analysis of actual versus perceived risks. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DuPont, R. L. (1980). Nuclear phobia: Phobic thinking about nuclear power. Washington, DC: The Media Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1992). Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 251–273). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R., Flynn, J., & Slovic, P. (1995). Technological stigma. American Scientist, 83, 220–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krimsky, S., & Golding, D. (1992). Social theories of risk. Westport, CT: Praeger- Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. Committee on Risk Perception and Communication. (1989). Improving risk communication. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otway, H. (1992). Public wisdom, expert fallibility: Toward a contextual theory of risk. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 215–228). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pidgeon, N., Hood, C., Jones, D., Turner, B., & Gibson, R. (1992). Risk perception. In The Royal Society Study Group (Ed.), Risk: Analysis, perception and management (pp. 89–134). London: The Royal Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. (1975). Choice between equally valued alternatives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 280–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. (1992). Perception of risk: Reflections on the psychometric paradigm. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 117–152). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tengs, T. O., Adams, M. E., Pliskin, J. S., Safran, D. G., Siegel, J. E., & Weinstein. (1995). Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost effectiveness. Risk Analysis, 15, 369–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 95, 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Policy Analysis. (1987). Unfinished business: A comparative assessment of environmental problems. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, N. (1983). Webster’s new twentieth century dictionary. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, R. F. (1993). Comment on Sheila Jasanoff’s guest editorial. Risk Analysis, 13, 495–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, B. (1992). Risk and social learning: Reification to engagement. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 275–300). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

Textverweise

  • This paper is based in part on P. Slovic, » Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield, « in M. H. Bazerman, D. M. Messick, A. E. Tenbrunsel, & K. A. Wade-Benzoni (Eds.), Environment, ethics, and behavior (pp. 277–313). San Francisco: New Lexington, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Oregon, Eugene,Oregon, USA

    Prof. Dr. Paul Slovic

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Paul Slovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Slovic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability (CCRS), Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Philipp Aerni

  2. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Großkrotzenburg, Hessen, Germany

    Klaus-Jürgen Grün

  3. Ethikverband der deutschen Wirtschaft e.V. Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Irina Kummert

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Slovic, P. (2016). Die Ethik des Präferenz-Managements: Risiko, Werte und Entscheidungen. In: Aerni, P., Grün, KJ., Kummert, I. (eds) Schwierigkeiten mit der Moral. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10282-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10282-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-10281-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-10282-1

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation