Skip to main content

The benefits of scenario-based planning

How scenario-based planning fosters flexible strategies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Scenario-based Strategic Planning

Abstract

In the last chapter we saw how scenario-based planning can improve decision processes. We will now turn our attention to decisions at an aggregated or corporate level. We will examine how entire strategies can change and – ideally – be optimized. The key question is how scenario-based planning can help make strategies more flexible. This chapter therefore begins by explaining what exactly is meant by "flexible strategies" and where they belong in the conceptual scheme of things. We will look at factors that impair the flexibility of a company's strategies and suggest ways to overcome these hindrances. Examples drawn from various industries illustrate why and in what areas today's businesses depend more heavily than ever on flexible strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bernau V. 2012. Dienstleister statt Verleger. Springer macht sein Geld im Netz. Süddeutsche Zeitung 08.03.2012, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burmann C. 2004a. Strategische Flexibilität und Strategiewechsel als Determinanten des Unternehmenswertes. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burmann C. 2004b. Strategische Flexibilität und der Marktwert von Unternehmen. In Erfolgsfaktor Flexibilität. Kaluza B., Becker T. (eds.). Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag: 29–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins DJ., Montgomery CA. 1994. Competing on Resources. Harvard Business Review 73(7/8): 118–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dambeck H. 2011. Wind im Tank. Spiegel Online. http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/technik/0,1518,793840,00.html. Accessed 13 March 2012.

  • Doz Y., Kosonen M. 2008. Fast Strategy– How strategic agility will help you to stay ahead of the game. Strategy Magazine 15(3), 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud R., Nayyar PR. 1994. Transformative capacity: Continual structuring by intertemporal technology transfer. Strategic Management Journal 15(5): 365–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert CG. 2005. Unbundling the structure of inertia. Resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of Management Journal 48(5): 741–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel G., Välikangas L. 2003. The quest for resilience. Harvard Business Review 81(9): 52–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan MT., Freeman J. 1984: Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review 49(2): 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob H. 1989. Flexibilität und ihre Bedeutung für die Betriebspolitik. In Integration und Flexibilität. Adam D., Backhaus K., Meffert H., Wagner H. (eds.). Wiesbaden: Gabler: 15–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsuhiko S., Hitt MA. 2004. Strategic flexibility: Organizational preparedness to reverse ineffective strategic decisions. Academy of Management Executive 18(4): 44–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna T., Song J., Kyungmook L. 2011: The paradox of Samsung’s rise. Harvard Business Review 89(7): 142–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaluza B. 1993. Flexibilität, betriebliche. In Handwörterbuch der Betriebswirtschaft. Wittmann W. et al. (eds.). Stuttgart: Schaeffer-Poeschel: 1174–1183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lengnick-Hall CA., Beck TE. 2009. Resilience Capacity and Strategic Agility: Prerequisites for Thriving in a Dynamic Environment. The University of Texas at San Antonio, College of Business Working Paper Series. http://business.utsa.edu/wps/mgt/0059MGT-199-2009.pdf. Accessed 13 March 2012.

  • Meffert H. 1985. Größere Flexibilität als Unternehmenskonzept. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung. 37(2): 121–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller D., Friesen PH. 1980. Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal 23(4), 591–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose E. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, A. (Ed.). 2011b. Intelligence on wheels. think:act Business COO Insights. Roland Berger Strategy Consultants. 2/2011: 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, A. (Ed.). 2011b. Can print survive the Internet? think:act Business COO Insights. Roland Berger Strategy Consultants. 2/2011: 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg G., Sydow J., Koch J. 2003: Organisatorische Pfade – Von der Pfadabhängigkeit zur Pfadkreation. In Strategische Prozesse und Pfade. Schreyögg J., Sydow J. (eds.). Wiesbaden: Gabler: 258–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow J., Schreyögg G., Koch J. 2009. Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review 34(4): 689–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. 2012. Technological change: The last Kodak moment? The Economist 402(8767): 63–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ., Pisano G., Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal 18(7): 509–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman ML., Romanelli E. 1985. Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7). Cummings, LL, Staw BM eds.(.) Greenwich: JAI Press: 171–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberda HW. 1997. Building flexible organizations for fast-moving markets. Long Range Planning 30(2): 169 -183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberda HW., Baden-Fuller C. 1998. Strategic Renewal and competence building. Four dynamic mechanisms. In Strategic Flexibility: Managing in a Turbulent Economy. Hamel G., Prahalad CK, Thomas H., O’Neal V. (eds.) Chichester: Wiley: 371–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt T. 2011. Automotive landscape 2025. Roland Berger Strategy Consultants study. http://www.rolandberger.com/media/press/releases/511-press_archive2011_sc_content/Automotive-landscape-2025.html. Accessed 13 March 2012.’

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Geissler, C., Krys, C. (2013). The benefits of scenario-based planning. In: Schwenker, B., Wulf, T. (eds) Scenario-based Strategic Planning. Roland Berger School of Strategy and Economics. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02875-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics