Skip to main content

Incorporating Muslim Migrants in Western Nation States—A Comparison of the United Kingdom, France, and Germany

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
After Integration

Part of the book series: Islam und Politik ((ISPO))

Abstract

Only recently has the religious dimension of international migration and integration moved up on the agenda of academic research and public policy. For a long time, and by following mainstream theories of secularization, both researchers and policy-makers tended to assume that traditional and religious attitudes of immigrants would successively dissolve in the process of acculturation and assimilation to industrial societies. Similar assumptions were shared by theorists of multiculturalism who stressed that migration processes were accompanied by new claims for recognition of particularistic cultural or ethnic identities, but ignored the specifically religious dimensions of such identities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Due to differing citizenship regimes and policies of naturalization, the number of Muslim immigrants with formal citizenship status still varies today. In the UK 80–90 % of the Muslim population, mostly from Pakistan, India and Bangladesh are British citizens; in France, about 50 % of the Muslim population, mostly of Maghrebian origin, hold a French passport; in Germany only 10 % have become German citizens; for details on these demographic data see Koenig (2003).

  2. 2.

    The Migrant Workers Convention (UN Doc. A/Res/45/158) came into force in 2003, although no Western state has yet ratified it. The Convention affirms the rights to religious liberty (Article 12) and demands “respect for the cultural identity of migrant workers and members of their families” (Article 31).

  3. 3.

    The Report to the Président Laïcité et République written by a Commission of political and intellectual leaders under Bernard Stasi to prepare new legislation explicitly places the French tradition in a broader international perspective; see Commission de réflexion sur l’application du principe de laïcité dans la République (2003).

References

  • Abramson, H. J. (1979). Migrants and cultural diversity: On ethnicity and religion in society. Social Compass, 26(1), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J.C. (2001). Theorizing “modes of Incorporation”: Assimilation, hyphenation, and multiculturalism as varieties of civil participation. Sociological Theory, 19(3), 238–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the secular. Christianity, Islam, modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V. (1999). Religions, pluralism, secularism or priority for democracy. Political Theory, 27(5), 597–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, G. (1999). The multicultural riddle: Rethinking national, ethnic, and religious identities. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bencheikh, S. (1998). Marianne et le prophète. L’Islam dans la France laïque. Paris: Bernard Grasset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, R. (1992). Citizenship and nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carens, J., & Williams, M. (1996). Muslim minorities in liberal democracies: The politics of misrecognition. In R. Bauböck, A. Heller, & A. R. Zolberg (Eds.), The challenge of diversity: Integration and pluralism and societies of immigration (pp. 157–186). Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, S. (1995). How nation states respond to immigration and ethnic diversity. New Community, 21(3), 293–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Césari, J. (1997). Être musulman en France aujourd’hui. Paris: Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, C., & Meyer, A. (1995). The institutionalization of Islam in the Netherlands and in the UK: The case of Islamic schools. New Community, 21(1), 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebaugh, H. R., & Chafetz, J. 2000. Religion across border: Transnational religious networks. Walnut Creek: Altamira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S. N., & Giesen, B. (1995). The construction of collective identity. Archives européennes de sociologie, 36, 72–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J., & Soper, C.J. 2004. Muslims and the state in Britain, France and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glick-Schiller, N., & Wimmer, A. (2003). Methodological nationalism, the social sciences, and the study of migration. An essay in historical epistemology. International Migration Review, 37(3), 576–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurowitz, A. (1999). Mobilizing international norms. Domestic actors, immigrants, and the Japanese state. World Politics, 51, 413–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepple, B., & Choudhury, T. (2001). Tackling religious discrimination: Practical implications for policy-makers and legislators (Home Office Research Study 21). London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jepperson, R. L. (2002). Political modernities: Disentangling two underlying dimensions of institutional differentiation. Sociological Theory, 20(1), 61–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonker, G. (2002). Muslim emancipation? Germany’s struggle over religious pluralism. In S. Koningsveld & W. Shadid (Eds.), Religious freedom and the neutrality of the state: The position of Islam in the European Union (pp. 36–51). Leuven: Peters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joppke, C. (1999). Immigration and the nation-state. The United States, Germany and Great Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, M. (1999). Cultural diversity and language policy. International Social Science Journal, 161, 401–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, M. (2003). Staatsbürgerschaft und religiöse Pluralität in post-nationalen Konstellationen. Philipps-Universität Marburg: Dissertation Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, M. (2005). Weltgesellschaft, Menschenrechte und der Formwandel des Nationalstaats. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, Sonderheft Weltgesellschaft, 374–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (1999). Challenging the liberal nation-state? Postnationalism, multiculturalism, and the collective claims making of migrants and ethnic minorities in Britain and Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 652–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laïcité et république – Rapport de la Commission de Réflexion sur l’Application du Principe de Laïcité dans la République remis au Président de la République le 11 Décembre 2003. Paris: La documentation française.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. (1994). Establishment, multiculturalism and British citizenship. Political Quaterly, 65(1), 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. (2000). Anti-essentialism, multiculturalism, and the ‘recognition’ of religious groups. In W. Kymlicka & W. Norman (Eds.), Citizenship in diverse societies (pp. 175–195). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, H. (1979). Theory and data on the religious behaviour of migrants. Social Compass, 26(1), 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münch, R. (2001). Nation and citizenship in the global age. From national to transnational ties and identities. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1999). Muslims and European education systems. In G. Martín Muñoz (Ed.), Islam, modernism and the West. Cultural and political relations at the end of the millennium (pp. 224–236). London: I.B.Tauris Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, E. (1995). Islam e Occidente. Roma: Edizione Lavoro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rath, J., Penninx, R., Groenendijk, K., & Meyer, A. (2001). Western Europe and its Islam. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Blancat, C. (1995). L’islam della diaspora. Roma: Edizione Lavoro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevaistre, V. (2004). L’islam dans la République: le CFCM. Regards sur l’actualité, 298, 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, S. (1999). Scripted debates: Twentieth-century immigration and citizenship policy in Great Britain, Ireland, and the United States. In M. Hanagan and C. Tilly (Eds.), Extending citizenship, reconfiguring states (pp. 67–96). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soysal, Y. N. (1994). Limits of citizenship. Migrants and postnational membership in Europe. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soysal, Y. N. (1997). Changing patterns of citizenship and claims-making: Organized Islam in European public spheres. Theory and Society, 26, 509–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tietze, N. (2001). Islamische Identitäten: Formen muslimischer Religiosität junger Männer in Deutschland und Frankreich. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Veer, P., & Lehmann, H. (Eds.). (1999). Nation and religion. Perspectives on Europe and Asia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S., & Peach, C. (Eds.). 1997. Islam in Europe: The politics of religion and community. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vom Dialog zur Kooperation. Die Integration von Muslimen in der Kommune. (2002) (Dokumentation eines Fachgespräches, Nummer 12). Berlin: Federal Commissioner for Foreigners’s Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werbner, P. (2002). The place which is diaspora: Citizenship, religion and gender in the making of chaordic transnationalism. Journal for Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28(1), 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willaime, J.-P. (1991). État, pluralisme et religion en France. Du monopole à la gestion des différences. In J. Baubérot (Ed.), Pluralisme et minorités religieuses (pp. 33–42). Louvain: Peeters.

    Google Scholar 

  • William, J.-C. (1991). Le Conseil d’État et la laïcité. Propos sur l’avis du 27 novembre 1989. Revue française de Science Politique, 41, 128–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, A. (2002). Nationalist exclusion and ethnic conflicts. Shadows of modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zolberg, A. R., & Woon, L. W. (1999). Why Islam is like Spanish: Cultural incorporation in Europe and the United States. Politics & Society, 27(1), 5–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to the participants of the “Immigration and Religion” Workshop at the Eighth Metropolis Conference in Vienna (2003) for their insightful comments on an earlier version of this article. He also thanks Schirin Amir-Moazami, Alexandre Caeiro, and Nikola Tietze for their helpful suggestions on this text. The usual disclaimers apply.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Koenig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koenig, M. (2015). Incorporating Muslim Migrants in Western Nation States—A Comparison of the United Kingdom, France, and Germany. In: Burchardt, M., Michalowski, I. (eds) After Integration. Islam und Politik. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02594-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics