Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Balancemanagement als Erfolgsfaktor von Organisation und Führung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Balance Management

  • 2778 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Organisationen und die in ihnen handelnden Akteure befinden sich in vielen Spannungsfeldern entgegengerichteter Strategien und Ziele (Lado, Boyd, Wright und Kroll, 2006). Organisationen sollen vorhandenes Wissen ausschöpfen, gleichzeitig jedoch neues Wissen suchen. Sie sollen langfristige Strategien verfolgen, aber gleichzeitig gute Quartalszahlen vorweisen und sie sollen zwar das Produktportfolio diversifizieren, sich parallel aber auf ihr Kerngeschäft konzentrieren.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Aiken, L. S. & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boerner, S. (1994). Die Organisation zwischen offener und geschlossener Gesellschaft – Athen oder Sparta? Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boerner, S. & Gebert, D. (1997). Unternehmen zwischen Resignation und Hoffnung – Ergebnisse einer Fallstudie in einem Moskauer Betrieb. Journal for East European Management Studies, 2(3),305–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchikhi, H. (1998). Living with and building on complexity: A constructivist perspective on organizations. Organization, 5(2),217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannick, M. T. & Prince, C. (1997). An overview of team performance measurement. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas & C. Prince, Team performance assessment and measurement (S. 1–18). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R., Hooijberg, R. & Quinn, R. E. (1995). Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership. Organization Science, 6(5),524–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman, E. A., Mumford, M. A., Zaccaro, S. J., Levin, K. Y., Korotkin, A. L. & Hein, M. B. (1991). Taxonomic Efforts in the description of leadership behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation. Leadership Quarterly, 2(4),245–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavetti, G. & Levinthal, D. (2000). Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 113–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, D. (2002). Fuhrung und Innovation. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, D. & Boerner, S. (1995). Manager im Dilemma – Abschied von der geschlossenen Gesellschaft? Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, D. & Boerner, S. (1999). The Open and the Closed Corporation as conflicting Forms of Organization. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35(3),341–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, D., Boerner, S. & Lanwehr, R. (2001a). Innovationsforderliche Offnungsprozesse: „Je mehr, desto besser?“ Die Betriebswirtschaft, 61(2),204–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, D., Boerner, S. & Lanwehr, R. (2001b). Innovation durch Empowerment – eine Chance ohne Risiken? In H. Bohler & J. Sigloch (Hrsg.), Unternehmensfuhrung und empirische Forschung (S. 144–175). Bayreuth: R.E.A.-Verlag Managementforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, D., Boerner, S. & Lanwehr, R. (2004). The more situation control, the more innovation? Putting the linearity thesis to the test. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 4(1),98–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, D., Boerner, S. & Matiaske, W. (1998). Offenheit und Geschlossenheit in Organisationen – Zur Validierung eines Messinstruments. Zeitschrift fur Arbeits- u. Organisationspsychologie, 42(1),15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, D., Boerner, S., & Kearney, E. (2010).Fostering team innovation: Why combining opposing action strategies? Organization Science, 21(3) 593–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B. & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The Antecedents, Consequences and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2),209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G. & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4),693–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L. & Quinn, R. E. (1993). Roles executives play: CEOs, Behavioral complexity, and firm performance. Human Relations, 46(5),543–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfrich, C. D., Yu-Fang, L., Mohr, D. C., Meterko, M. & Sales, A. E. (2007). Assessing an organizational culture instrument based on the Competing Values Framework: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Implementation Science, 2(13),1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooijberg, R. (1996). A multidirectional approach toward leadership: an extension of the concept of behavior complexity. Human Relations, 49(7),919–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooijberg, R. & Quinn, R. E. (1992). Behavioral complexity and the development of effective managerial leaders. In R. L. Phillips & J. G. Hunt (Eds.), Strategic management: A multiorganizational-level perspective. (S. 161–176), New York: Quorum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. M. & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation: Key predictors of consolidatedbusiness- unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6),891–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, T.S., Bedell-Avers, K.E. & Mumford, M.D. (2007). The typical leadership study: Assumptions, implications, and potential remedies. Leadership Quarterly, 18(1),435–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itami, H. (1987). Mobilizing Invisible Assets. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., Demaree, R. G. & Wolf, G. (1983). Estimating Within-Group Interrater Reliability with and without Response Bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1),85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, H., Fry, R. & Srivasta, S. (1990). The Office of the CEO: Understanding the Executive Experience. Academy of Management Executive, 4(3),36–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, D. I., Chow, C. & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 525–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lado, A. A., Boyd, N. G., Wright, W. & Kroll, K. (2006). Paradox and theorizing within the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31(1),115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamond, D. (2003). The value of Quinn’s competing values model in an Australian context. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(1),46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanwehr, R. (2008). Zum Zusammenhang von Fuhrungsverhalten und Fuhrungserfolg. Eine Diskussion aus dilemmatheoretischer Perspektive. Berlin: Technische Universitat Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S. & Patil, A. (2006). Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research. Management Science, 52(12),1865–1883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. E. & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure and process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1975). The manager’s job: Folklore and fact. Harvard business review, 53(4),49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E. W. & Phelps, C. C: (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4),403–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1980). Die offene Gesellschaft und ihre Feinde. 2 Bande. Tubingen: Francke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L. W. & McLaughlin (2006). Leadership and the organizational context: Like the weather? The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6),559–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. E. (1988). Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. E. & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A Spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Toward a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3),363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G. & Tushman, M.L. (2009). Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance. Organization Science, 20(4),685–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. L. & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2),147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. K. & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(3),522–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W.K. & Lewis, M.W. (2011). Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamix Equilibrium Model of Organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2),381–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (2006). Method Variance in Organizational Research. Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2),221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strack, M., Boultgen, D., Kenkmann, C. & Held, M. (2004). Sozialperspektivische Imagepositionierung als Feedbackinstrument zur Unterstutzung kundenorientierten Managements. In W. Bungard, B. Koop & C. Liebig (Hrsg.), Psychologie und Wirtschaft leben. Aktuelle Themen der Wirtschaftspsychologie in Forschung und Praxis (S. 362–369). Munchen: Hampp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. D. (2000). Gender, Leadership Orientation, and Effectiveness: Testing the Theoretical Models of Bolman & Deal and Quinn. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 42(11–12),969–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman, N. & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 11(4),801–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersema, M.F. & Bowen, H.P. (2008). Corporate diversification: the impact of foreign competition, industry globalization, and product diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 29(2),115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (1998). Leadership in Organizations (4. Auflage). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Professor für Wirtschaftspsychologie, BiTS Iserlohn, Reiterweg 26 b, Iserlohn, 58636, Deutschland

    Prof.Dr. Ralf Lanwehr

Authors
  1. Prof.Dr. Ralf Lanwehr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf Lanwehr .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Professor für Wirtschaftspsychologie, BiTS Iserlohn, Reiterweg 26 b, Iserlohn, 58636, Germany

    Ralf Lanwehr

  2. BiTS Iserlohn, Reiterweg 26 b, Iserlohn, 58636, Germany

    Matthias Müller-Lindenberg

  3. BiTS Iserlohn, Reiterweg 26 b, Iserlohn, 58636, Germany

    Daria Mai

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lanwehr, R. (2013). Balancemanagement als Erfolgsfaktor von Organisation und Führung. In: Lanwehr, R., Müller-Lindenberg, M., Mai, D. (eds) Balance Management. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02192-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02192-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-02191-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-02192-4

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation