Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Eine Neubewertung militanter politischer Religion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Europäische Religionspolitik

Part of the book series: Politik und Religion ((PUR,volume 14))

  • 1473 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Debatten über militante politische Religion scheinen sich in Extremen zu bewegen: Einerseits werden religiös motivierte politische Akteure als besonders gewaltbereit charakterisiert. Andererseits ist es nicht klar ob und wie religiöse Motivationen politische Auseinandersetzungen substanziell beeinflussen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Audi, Robert/Wolterstorff, Nicholas,1997: Religion in the Public Square: the Place of Religious Convictions in Political Debate. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cady, Linell Elizabeth/Simon, Sheldon W., 2007: Religion and conflict in South and Southeast Asia: disrupting violence. Asian security studies. London/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanaugh, William T., 2009: The myth of religious violence secular ideology and the roots of modern conflict. Oxford/New York. http://www.netlibrary.com/summary.asp?ID = 294783.

  • Chatterjee, Partha,1993: The nation and its fragments: Colonial and postcolonial histories. Princeton studies in culture/power/history. Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, Partha,2004: The politics of the governed: reflections on popular politics in most of the world. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chidester, David,1996: Savage Systems: Colonialism and Comparative Religion in Southern Africa. Charlottesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Harvey/Sharma, Arvind/Abe, Masao/Sachedina, Abdulaziz/Oberoi, Hajot/Idel, Moshe,1994: World Religions and Conflict Resolution, in: Johnston, Douglas/Sampson, Cynthia (Hrsg.), Religion, the missing dimension of statecraft. Oxford/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzegerald, Timothy,2000: The ideology of religious studies. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen,2005: Religion in the Public Sphere. Lecture Presented at the Holberg Prize Seminar, 29.11.2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haj, Samira,2009: Reconfiguring Islamic tradition: reform, rationality, and modernity. Cultural memory in the present. Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenclever, Andreas,2011: Ressource Gott? – Zur Rolle von Religionen in gewaltträchtigen Konflikten, in: Baumgart-Ochse, Claudia/Schörnig, Niklas/Wisotzki, Simone/Wolff, Jonas (Hrsg.), Auf dem Weg zu Just Peace Governance: Beiträge zum Auftakt des neuen Forschungsprogramms der HSFK. Baden-Baden, 179-196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Bruce/Goldberg, Jeffrey,2005: Religion and Terrorism. A conversation with Bruce Hoffman and Jeffrey Goldberg, in: Cromartie, Michael (Hrsg.), Religion, culture, and international conflict: a conversation. Lanham, Chapter 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P., 2005: Religion, Culture, and International Conflict after September 11. A Conversation with Samuel P. Huntington, in: Cromartie, Michael (Hrsg.), Religion, culture, and international conflict: a conversation. Lanham, Chapter 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juergensmeyer, Mark,2007: From Bhindranwale to Bin Laden: A Search for Understanding Religious Violence, in: Cady, Linell E./Simon, Sheldon W. (Hrsg.), Religion and conflict in South and Southeast Asia: disrupting violence. London/New York, 21-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juergensmeyer, Mark,2008: Global rebellion: religious challenges to the secular state, from Christian militias to al Qaeda. Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuru, Ahmed,2007: Passive and Assertive Secularism: Historical Conditions, Ideological Struggles, and State Policies toward Religion, in: World Politics, 59: July, 568-594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, J. P.,2004: Understanding religious violence: thinking outside the box on terrorism. Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, Donald S., 1998: Prisoners of Shangri-La: Tibetan Buddhism and the West. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Pippa/Inglehart, Ronald,2004: Sacred and secular: religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge studies in social theory, religion, and politics. Cambridge/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard/Vattimo, Gianni/Zabala, Santiago,2005: The Future of Religion. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharf, Robert H., 1995: The Zen of Japanese Nationalism, in: Lopez, Donald S. (Hrsg.): Curators of the Buddha: the study of Buddhism under colonialism. Chicago, 107-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tambiah, Stanley Jeyaraja,1992: Buddhism Betrayed? Religion, Politics, and Violence in Sri Lanka. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veer, Peter vander/Lehmann, Hartmut,1999: Nation and religion: perspectives on Europe and Asia. Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verfassungsgerichtshof, Bayerischer,2007: Entscheidung des Bayerischen Verfassungsgerichtshofs vom 15.01.2007 über die Popularklage der Islamischen Religionsgemeinschaft e. V. in B. auf Feststellung der Verfassungswidrigkeit des Art. 59 Abs. 2 Satz 3 des Bayerischen Gesetzes über das Erziehungs- und Unterrichtswesen (BayEUG) in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 31.05.2000 (GVBl S. 414, BayRS 2230-1-1-UK), zuletzt geändert durch Gesetz vom 26.07.2006 (GVBl S. 397).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vial, Theodore M., 2004: Liturgy Wars: Ritual Theory and Protestant Reform in Nineteenth-Century Zurich. New York/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viefhues-Bailey, Ludger,2010: Between a Man and a Woman? Why Conservatives oppose Same-Sex Marriage. New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Luzern, Syracuse, USA

    Prof. Dr. phil. Ludger Viefhues-Bailey

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. phil. Ludger Viefhues-Bailey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    Ines-Jacqueline Werkner

  2. Universität Luzern, Luzern, 6002, Luzern, Switzerland

    Antonius Liedhegener

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Viefhues-Bailey, L. (2013). Eine Neubewertung militanter politischer Religion. In: Werkner, IJ., Liedhegener, A. (eds) Europäische Religionspolitik. Politik und Religion, vol 14. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00959-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00959-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-00958-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-00959-5

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation