Abstract
Most of the structure of a brain as we see it by macroscopic and microscopic observation is genetically determined. This conclusion may be reached simply from the observation that newborn, or even embryonic brains already have well-developed structures before the attached sense organs have ever received stimuli. No one seriously believes that we begin life as unstructured beings, as “tabulae rasae ”: clean slates on which only experience will leave marks. Yet, it is not to be doubted that some of the structure of the brain is formed during a learning phase, and probably embodies experience. There have been several claims in recent years of certain microscopic, and even macroscopic features of the brain developing in different ways under the influence of conditions imposed by the environment [5.8, 5.10]. On the whole, however, it is probably safe to say that memory traces have up to now escaped microscopic observation. What we see is inborn structure, or rather, if some of the histologic detail is due to learning, we do not know how to relate it to specific memory traces.
To Martin.
It is surprising how little attention has been paid to the nervous system of arthropods and particularly to that of insects during the last decades which have otherwise produced such a copious neurological bibliography. These animals possess an extraordinarily complex and differentiated nervous system, and a fineness of structure that reaches the limits of the ultramicroscopic.
Cajal and Sanchez [5.5]
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Autrum, H. J., Wiedemann, L: Versuche über den Strahlengang im Insektenauge (Appositionsauge). Z. Naturforsch. 17b, 480–482 (1962)
Braitenberg, V.: Patterns of projection in the visual system of the fly. I. Retina-lamina projections. Exptl. Brain Res. 3, 271–298 (1967)
Braitenberg, V.: The anatomical substratum of visual perception in flies. A sketch of the visual ganglia. Rendiconti S. I. F. XLIII, Reichardt, W. (ed.) London-New York: Academic Press, 1969, pp. 328–340
Braitenberg, V., Debbage, P.: A regular net of reciprocal synapses in the visual system of the fly, Musca domestica. J. Comp. Physiol. 90, 25–31 (1974)
Cajal, S. R., Sanchez, D.: Contribucion al conocimiento de los centros nerviosos de los insectos. Parte 1. Retina y centros opticos. Trab. Lab. Invest. Biol. Univ. Madr. 13, 1–168 (1915)
Horridge, G.A., Meinertzhagen, I.A.: The accuracy of the pattern of connexions of the first-and second-order neurons of the visual system of Calliphora. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 175, 69–82 (1970)
Kirschfeld, K.: Die Projektion der optischen Umwelt auf das Raster der Rhabdomere im Komplexauge von Musca. Exptl. Brain Res. 3, 248–270 (1967)
Rosenzweig, M. R., Bennett, E.L., Diamond, M. G: Brain changes in response to experience. Sci. Amer. 226/2, 22 (1972)
Strausfeld, N.J., Braitenberg, V.: The compound eye of the fly (Musca domestica): connections between the cartridges of the lamina ganglionaris. Z. vergl. Physiol. 70, 95–104 (1970)
Valverde, F.: Apical dendritic spines of the visual cortex and light deprivation in the mouse. Exptl. Brain Res. 3, 337–352 (1967)
Vigier, P.: Mécanisme de la synthèse des impressions lumineuses recueillies par les yeux composés des Diptères. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 122-124 (1907)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1977 Springer Science+ Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Braitenberg, V. (1977). How Accurately Are Brains Designed?. In: On the Texture of Brains. Heidelberg Science Library. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-87702-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-87702-5_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-08391-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-87702-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive