Skip to main content

Accuracy of Finite Element Solutions for Flexible Beams Using Corotational Formulation

  • Conference paper
Contemporary Research in Engineering Science
  • 260 Accesses

Abstract

According to the polar decomposition theorem, the total deformation is decomposed into the rigid body deformation and the relative deformation. On the basis of this theorem, the relative deformation is described by using the moving coordinate system, referred to as the corotational formulation. This formulation has often been used in the finite element analysis for geometrically nonlinear problems of flexible beams. The use of the corotational formulation is motivated by the assumption of small strains in the beam. A linear theory or a beam-column theory has often been introduced for describing the relative deformation so that a simple expression for the strain energy function is obtained. In spite of using the small-strain assumption, satisfactory numerical results have been obtained by increasing the number of elements. The accuracy of finite element solutions, however, has not fully been discussed from a theoretical point of view. Goto, Hasegawa and Nishino (1984), Goto, Kasugai and Nishino (1987) and Iura (1994) have discussed the accuracy of finite element solutions for Bernoulli-Euler’s beam. Iura (1994) has pointed out that even if the linear theory is used for describing the relative deformation, the numerical solutions obtained converge to the solutions of the finite-strain beam theory as the number of elements is increased. In the case of Timoshenko’s beam, however, there have been few studies to ascertain the accuracy of finite element solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Y. Goto, A. Hasegawa and F. Nishino, Accuracy and convergence of the separation of rigid body displacements for plane curved frames, Proc. of JSCE, No.344/1-1 (1984), pp. 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Goto, Y. Kasugai and F. Nishino, On the choice of local coordinates in the finite displacement analysis of plane frames, Proc. of JSCE No. 386/1-8 (1987), pp. 311–320.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Iura, Effects of coordinate system on the accuracy of corotational formulation for Bernoulli-Euler’s beam, Int. J. Solids and Structures, Vol. 3, No. 20 (1994), pp. 2793–2806.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Kardestuncer (ed.), Finite Element Handbook, McGraw-Hill, Inc. (1987).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Iura and M. Hirashima, Geometrically nonlinear theory of Timoshenko’s beam with finite rotations in space, Proc. of JSCE, No. 380/1-7 (1987), pp. 411–417 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Iwakuma and S. Kuranishi, How much contribution does the shear deformation have in a beam theory ?, Proc. of JSCE, No.344/I-l (1984), pp. 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Iwakuma, Timoshenko beam theory with extension effect and its stiffness equation for finite rotation, Computers and Structures, Vol. 34 (2) (1990), pp. 239–250.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. I. Sheinman, Large deflection of curved beam with shear deformation, Proc. of ASCE, Vol.108, No.EM4 (1982), pp. 636–647.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.C. Simo, A finite strain beam formulation. The three dimensional dynamic problem. Part 1., Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrg., Vol. 49 (1985), pp. 55–70.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. G.B. Sinclair, The non-linear bending of a cantilever beam with shear and longitudinal deformations, Int. J. Non-Linear Mechanics, Vol. 14 (1979), pp. 111–122.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. E. Reissner, On one-dimensional finite-strain beam theory: the plane problem, J. Appl. Math. Phys., Vol. 23 (1972), pp. 795–804.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Reissner, On one-dimensional large displacement finite-strain beam theory, Studies in Applied Mathematics, Vol. LII No. 2 (1973), pp. 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  13. K.E. Atkinson, . John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  14. T.J.R. Hughes, The Finite Element Method, Prentice-Hall, Inc. (1987).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Goto, T. Yoshimitsu and M. Obata, Elliptic integral solutions of plane elastica with axial and shear deformations, Int. J. Solids and Structures, Vol. 26 (4) (1990), pp. 375–390.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Iura, M., Furuta, M. (1995). Accuracy of Finite Element Solutions for Flexible Beams Using Corotational Formulation. In: Batra, R.C. (eds) Contemporary Research in Engineering Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80001-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80001-6_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-80003-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-80001-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics