Skip to main content

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NATO ASI F,volume 144))

Abstract

In the elephant paper, Brooks criticized the ungroundedness of traditional symbol systems and proposed physically grounded systems as an alternative. We want to make a contribution towards integrating the old with the new. We describe the GLAIR agent architecture that specifies an integration of explicit representation and reasoning mechanisms, embodied semantics through grounding symbols in perception and action, and implicit representations of special-purpose mechanisms of sensory processing, perception, and motor control. We present some agent components that we place in our architecture to build agents that exhibit situated activity and learning, and some applications. We believe that the Brooksian behavior generation approach goes a long way towards modeling elephant behavior, which we find most interesting, but that in order to generate more deliberative behavior we need something more.

The research reported in this paper was carried out while the first authors was a member of the SNePS researchg Group at the department of Computer Science, SUNY at Buffalo, and was supported in part by Equipment Grant No. EDUDUS-932022 from SUN Microsystems Computer Corporation, and in part by NASA under contract NAS 9-19004.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. Agre. The dynamic structure of everyday life. Technical Report 1085, MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. E. Agre and D. Chapman. Pengi: An implementation of a theory of activity. In Proceedings of AAAI-87, Seattle WA, pp. 268–272, July 1987

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Albus, A. Barbera, and R. Nagel. Theory and practice of hierarchical control. In 23rd International IEEE Computer Society Conference, pp. 18–38, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. R. Anderson. The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Anderson, D. Hart, and P. Cohen. Two ways to act. In ACM SIGART Bulletin, pp. 20–24. ACM publications, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. H. Ballard and C. M. Brown. Computer Vision. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Bandera, H. Hexmoor, and S. C. Shapiro. Foveal machine vision for robots using agent based gaze control final report. Technical Report SBIR-NAS 9–19004, Amherst Systems Inc., Buffalo, NY, September 1994

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Berlin and P. Kay. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1991 edition, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Brooks. A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. Technical Report 864, MIT AI Labs, MIT, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Brooks. Planning is just a way of avoiding figuring out what to do next. Technical Report 303, MIT AI Labs, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. A. Brooks. Elephants dont play chess. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 6: 3–15, 1990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Card, T. Moran, and A. Newell. The Psychology of Human–Computer Interaction. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Chapman. Vision, instruction, and action. Technical Report 1204, MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Connell. SSS: A hybrid architecture applied to robot navigation. In IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2719–2724, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Culbertson. The Minds of Robots. U. of Illinois Press, 1963

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. J. Firby. An investigation into reactive planning in complex domains. In Proceedings of AAAI–87, pp. 202–206, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Fodor. The Modularity of Mind. MIT Press, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. Gat. Reliable goal–directed reactive control of autonomous mobile robots. Technical report, Dept. of Computer Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Harnad. The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42 (1–3): 335–346, 1990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Harnad. Electronic symposium on computation, cognition and the symbol grounding problem. Ftp archive at princeton. edu:/pub/harnad/sg. comp. arch, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Hausser. Computation of Language: An Essay on Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics in Natural Man–Machine Communication. Springer–Verlag, New York, NY, 1989

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. H. Hexmoor. An architecture for reactive sensor–based robots. In NASA God– dard conference on AI, Greenbelt, MD, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  23. H. Hexmoor. Representing and learning successful routine activities. Unpublished PhD Proposal, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. Hexmoor, G. Caicedo, F. Bidwell, and S. Shapiro. Air battle simulation: An agent with conscious and unconscious layers. In University at Buffalo Graduate Conference on Computer Science 93 (TR–93–14). Dept. of Computer Science, SUNY at Buffalo, New York, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Hexmoor, J. Lammens, G. Caicedo, and S. C. Shapiro. Behavior based AI, cognitive processes, and emergent behaviors in autonomous agents. In G. Rzevski, J. Pastor, and R.Adey (eds.), Applications of AI in Engineering VIII, Vol. 2, Applications and Techniques, pp. 447–461. CMI/Elsevier, 1993. Reprint available TR–93–15, CS dept., SUNY/BufFalo

    Google Scholar 

  26. H. Hexmoor, J. Lammens, and S. Shapiro. Embodiment in GLAIR: A grounded layered architecture with integrated reasoning for autonomous agents. In D. D. Dankel (ed.), Proceedings of the 6th Florida AI Research Symposium, pp. 325–329. Florida AI Research Society, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  27. H. Hexmoor, J. Lammens, and S. C. Shapiro. An autonomous agent architecture for integrating unconscious and reasoned behaviors. In Proceedings of Computer Architectures for Machine Perception, New Orleans, LA, 1993. Preprint available as TR–93–36, CS dept., SUNY/BufFalo

    Google Scholar 

  28. H. Hexmoor and D. Nute. Methods for deciding what to do next and learning. Technical Report AI–1992–01, AI Programs, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 1992. Also available as TR–92–23, CS dept., SUNY/BufFalo

    Google Scholar 

  29. H. Hexmoor and S. C. Shapiro. Examining the expert reveals expertise. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Human and Machine Cognition: Expertise in Context ( Seaside, FL ), 1993

    Google Scholar 

  30. L. Kaelbling. Goals as parallel program specifications. In Proceedings of AAAI–88. Morgan Kaufmann, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  31. L. Kaelbling and S. Rosenschein. Action and planning in embedded agents. In P. Maes (ed.), Designing Autonomous Agents, pp. 35–48. MIT Press, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  32. P. Kay and C. K. McDaniel. The linguistic significance of the meaning of Basic Color Terms. Language, 54 (3): 610–646, 1978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. D. Kumar. An integrated model of acting and inference. In D. Kumar (ed.), Current Trends in SNPS–Semantic Network Processing System: Proceedings of the First Annual SNPS Workshop, pp. 55–65, Buffalo, NY, 1990. Springer– Verlag

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. D. Kumar. From Beliefs and Goals to Intentions and Actions: An Amalgamated Model of Inference and Acting. PhD thesis, Technical Report 94–04, Department of Computer Science, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  35. D. Kumar. The SNPS BDI architecture. Journal of Decision Support Systems—Special Issue on Logic Modeling, 1994. Forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  36. D. Kumar and S. C. Shapiro. Acting in service of inference (and vice versa). In D. D. Dankel II (ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Symposium, pp. 207–211. the Florida AI Research Society, St. Petersburg, FL, May 1994

    Google Scholar 

  37. J. Laird, M. Huka, E. Yager, and C. Tucker. Robo–SOAR: An integration of external interaction, planning, and learning, using SOAR. In Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  38. J. E. Laird, A. Newell, and P. S. Rosenbloom. SOAR: An architecture for general intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 33: 1–64, 1987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. G. Lakoff. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  40. J. M. Lammens. A somewhat fuzzy color categorization model. Submitted to ICCV–95

    Google Scholar 

  41. J. M. Lammens. A Computational Model of Color Perception and Color Naming. PhD thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1994. Also available as TR–94–26, CS dept., SUNY/Buffalo

    Google Scholar 

  42. P. Langley, K. McKusick, and J. Allen. A design for the ICARUS architecture. In ACM SIGART Bulletin, pp. 104–109. ACM publications, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  43. H. J. Levesque. Logic and the complexity of reasoning. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 17: 355–389, 1988

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. P. Maes. Action selection. In Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society Conference, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  45. R. J. Makar. GLAIR: Mobile robot lab camera simulation. Masters project dept. of Computer Science, SUNY at Buffalo, NY, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  46. J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart, and G. E. Hinton. The appeal of parallel distributed processing. In D. Rumelhart, J. McClelland, and the PDP Research Group (eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing, chapter 1, pp. 3–44. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA MA, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  47. D. McDermott. Robot planning. Technical Report CS–861, Yale University, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  48. D. Payton. An architecture for reflexive autonomous vehicle control. In Proceedings of Robotics Automation, pp. 1838–1845. IEEE, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  49. J. Pollock. How to Build a Person. MIT Press, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  50. J. Pollock. New foundations for practical reasoning. In Minds and Machines, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  51. W. J. Rapaport. Syntactic semantics: Foundations of computational natural– language understanding. In J. H. Fetzer (ed.), Aspects of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 81–131. Kluwer Academic, New York, 1988

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  52. D. Regan and K. Beverly. Looming detectors in the human visual pathways. In Vision Research 18, pp. 209–212. 1978

    Google Scholar 

  53. J. K. Rosenblatt and D. Payton. A fine–grained alternative to the subsumption architecture for mobile robot control. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  54. S. Russell. An architecture for bounded rationality. In ACM SIGART Bulletin, pp. 146–150. ACM publications, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  55. M. J. Schoppers. Universal plans for unpredictable environments. In Proceedings 10th IJCAI, pp. 1039–1046, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  56. S. C. Shapiro. Cables, paths, and subconscious reasoning in propositional semantic networks. In Principles of Semantic Networks. Morgan Kaufmann, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  57. S. C. Shapiro and W. J. Rapaport. SNPS considered as a fully intensional propositional semantic network. In N. Cercone and G. McCalla (eds.), The knowledge frontier: essays in the representation of knowledge, pp. 262–315. Springer Verlag, New York, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  58. S. C. Shapiro and W. J. Rapaport. The SNPS family. Computers Math. Applic., 23 (2–5): 243–275, 1992

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. S. C. Shapiro and the SNPS Implementation Group. SNPS 2. 1 Users Manual. Department of Computer Science, SUNY at Buffalo, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  60. W.–M. Shen. Learning from the Environment Based on Actions and Percepts. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  61. R. Simmons. An architecture for coordinating planning, sensing, and action. In Proceedings of the DARPA planning workshop, pp. 292–297, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  62. L. A. Suchman. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human Machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  63. P. H. Winston. Learning structural descriptions from examples. In R. J. Brachman and H. J. Levesque (eds.), Readings in Knowledge Representation, pp. 141–168. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1985 (orig. 1975 )

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lammens, J.M., Hexmoor, H.H., Shapiro, S.C. (1995). Of Elephants and Men. In: Steels, L. (eds) The Biology and Technology of Intelligent Autonomous Agents. NATO ASI Series, vol 144. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79629-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79629-6_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-79631-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79629-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics