Skip to main content
  • 401 Accesses

Abstract

Business operates under environmental constraints. These involve commercial risks as well as operating costs. Green consumers, green voters and green government have raised the stakes. The risks are real and the sums are significant.

Risks derive from both legal and market processes and include: penalties, asset forfeits, cleanup costs, compensation claims, forced closure, and compulsory plant upgrades; and lost market share, lower share prices, higher finance costs, reduced credit and higher insurance premiums.

Liabilities and losses from poor environmental management can now reach several billion dollars: enough to bankrupt all but the largest companies. These risks do not only apply to operating corporations, but also to suppliers, customers, shareholders, arbitrageurs and financiers. Liabilities may also be applied to individual directors and staff. Environmental insurance is therefore an essential component of corporate risk management strategies.

To identify and quantify environmental risks, a company needs comprehensive environmental audits. To control those risks, a company needs good environmental management to minimise environmental damage for which it may be held liable; and insurance, to cover unforeseen environmental damage which may occur nevertheless. There is a rapidly growing environmental insurance industry in most western nations, but it will only underwrite some risks. For others, companies must insure themselves.

Because of legal uncertainties surrounding the application of comprehensive general liability (CGL) policies to environmental damage, specific environmental impairment liability (EIL) policies will generally provide more reliable cover. The wording of EIL policies can be quite restrictive, however, and requires careful scrutiny.

In the next few years, environmental insurance will almost certainly increase rapidly in importance for industry and commerce, insurers and lawyers, and the general community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abraham KS (1988) Environmental liability and the limits of insurance. Columbia Law Rev 88:942–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley LJ (1987) Representation of the insurers’ interests in an environmental damage claim. Def Counsel J 54:11–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Black B, Zimmerman GE, Bailey RE, Westendorf R (1988) Toxic and hazardous substances and environmental law: 1987 survey. Tort Insur Law J 23:455–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Black K (1989) Through the looking glass — perception and reality. Aust Insur Instit J 12:42–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley RC (1990a) Framework for environmental insurance. Environ Plan Law J 7:229–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley RC (1990b) Current trends in environmental law and practice. Environ Plan Law J 7:169–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley RC (1990c) Environmental audits: review and guidelines. Environ Plan Law J 7:127–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley RC (1990d) Environmental audit: Course handbook (3rd edn) Bond University, Gold Coast 350 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey C (1990) Financing in the new environment. In: Building bridges (unpag). BRW, Melbourne, 8 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Fordyce J, Kofman J, Tay R (1990) Environmental liability: a gun at the lender’s head? Int Financ Law Rev May 1990:19–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon TA, Westendorf R (1989) Liability coverage for toxic tort, hazardous waste disposal and other pollution exposures. Idaho Law Rev 25:567–618

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibbotson P (1990) Environmental audits — what financiers should require. In: Pollution law. Calcutt, Watson, Sydney, 37 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald J (1990) Legal framework for insurance claims. In: Environmental risks and insurance. Calcutt Watson, Sydney, 22 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea P (1990) Environmental impairment liability insurance. In: Pollution law. Calcutt Watson, Sydney, 9 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott MK, Brossman DS (1990) The environmental liability handbook for property transfer and financing. Lewis, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruett MC (1990) Environmental cleaning costs and insurance: seeking a solution. Georgia Law Rev 24:705–732

    Google Scholar 

  • US Council on Environmental Quality (USCEQ) (1990) Risk analysis: a guide to principles and methods for analysing health and environmental Risks. USCEQ, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Windeyer C (1990) Environmental hazards to lenders. Company Director 6(8):38

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagaski CA (1990) Environmental risk and insurance. Lewis, Boca Raton (in press)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Buckley, R. (1991). Environmental Insurance. In: Perspectives in Environmental Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76502-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76502-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-53815-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-76502-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics