Abstract
This chapter consists of three short essays discussing different aspects of the role of environmental scientists in environmental planning and management.
The first discusses the difference between environmental science and environmental management. Science and management have different goals, and so do scientists and managers. Environmental science is a vital component of environmental management, but not the only one. The main problems in environmental planning and management at present are institutional rather than technical
The second discusses a number of recent proposals for improving EIA. At present, EIA is generally carried out by consultants on behalf of proponents. There have been suggestions that it could be improved if it were carried out directly by the government; by independent consultants nominated by planning agencies; or by judicial inquiries. Alternatively, EIS’s could be reviewed by consultants on behalf of government, so that one team of consultants prepared the EIS and another criticised it. It has also been suggested that EIS’s should present economic information in the same detail as environmental information.
The third examines the role of ecologists in industry. Ecologists interact with private enterprise both from inside and outside the private sector. In addition, private enterprise includes a wide range of activities not of particular concern to ecologists; and industry includes public-sector corporations such as electricity commissions, as well as private-sector corporations. This contribution is concerned principally with ecologists working in industry.
As an Appendix, the chapter includes a generic environmental policy for industry institutes and associations, easily adapted to specific industries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Buckley RC (1989a). Precision in environmental impact prediction: first national environmental audit, Australia. CRES, ANU, Canberra
Buckley RC (1989b) What’s wrong with EIA? Search 20:146–147
Buckley RC (1990) Environmental science and environmental management. Search 21:14–16
Coombs HC (1990) The return of scarcity. Cambridge University Press, Melbourne, 171 PP
Davey C (1990) Financing in the new environment. In: Building bridges (seminar proceedings, 21.5.90). Business Review Weekly, Australian Consolidated Press, Sydney
Fairweather PG (1989) Where is the science in EIA? Search 20:141–144
Mcintosh JL (1989) Successes of EIA should not be forgotten. Search 20.
Odgers B (1989) Commonwealth recognises need for better science. Search 20:145
Ruckelshaus WD (1983) Science, risk and public policy. Science 221:1026–1028
Salmon S (1990) Australian Conservation Foundation priorities. In: Building bridges (seminar proceedings, 21. 5. 90). Business Review Weekly, Australian Consolidated Press, Sydney
Sanders N (1989) Speech to Royal Australian Institute of Public Administration, 6.2.90, Canberra.
Schindler DW (1976) The impact statement boondoggle. Science 192:509
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Buckley, R. (1991). The Role of Environmental Scientists. In: Perspectives in Environmental Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76502-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76502-5_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-53815-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-76502-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive