Skip to main content

Concept Logics

  • Conference paper
Computational Logic

Part of the book series: ESPRIT Basic Research Series ((ESPRIT BASIC))

Abstract

Concept languages (as used in BACK, KL-ONE, KRYPTON, LOOM) are employed as knowledge representation formalisms in Artificial Intelligence. Their main purpose is to represent the generic concepts and the taxonomical hierarchies of the domain to be modeled. This paper addresses the combination of the fast taxonomical reasoning algorithms (e.g. subsumption, the classifier etc.) that come with these languages and reasoning in first order predicate logic. The interface between these two different modes of reasoning is accomplished by a new rule of inference, called constrained resolution. Correctness, completeness as well as the decidability of the constraints (in a restricted constraint language) are shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baader, F.: “Regular Extensions of KL-ONE”, DFKI Research Report, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beierle, C., Hedtstück, U.,Pletat, U., Schmitt, P. H., Siekmann, J.: “An Order-Sorted Logic for Knowledge Representation Systems”, IWBS Report 113, IBM Deutschland, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brachman, R. J., Schmolze, J. G.: “An Overview of the KL-ONE Knowledge Representation System”, Cognitive Science, 9(2), pp. 171–216, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brachman, R.J., Levesque, H.J.: Readings in Knowledge Representation. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1985.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • z, R.J., Pigman Gilbert, V., Levesque, H.J.: “An Essential Hybrid Reasoning System: Knowledge and Symbol Level Account in KRYPTON”, in Proceedings of the 9th IJCAI, pp. 532–539, Los Angeles, Cal., 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürckert, H.-J.: “A Resolution Principle for a Logic with Restricted Quantifiers”, Dissertation, Universität Kaiserslautern, Postfach 3049, D-6750 Kaiserslautern, West-Germany, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürckert, H.-J.: “A Resolution Principle for Clauses with Constraints”, in Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Automated Deduction, Springer LNAI 449, pp. 178–192, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, A. G.: “A More Expressive Formulation of Many-Sorted Logic”, JAR 3,2, pp. 113–200, 1987.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, A.: “A General Framework for Sorted Deduction: Fundamental Results on Hybrid Reasoning”, in Proceedings of International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 126–136, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, A.: “An Investigation into Inference with Restricted Quantification and Taxonomic Representation”, Logic Programming Newsletters, 6, pp. 5–8, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhfeld, M., Smolka, G.: “Definite Relations over Constraint Languages”, LILOG-Report 53, IBM Deutschland, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollunder, B.: “Hybrid Inferences in KL-ONE-based Knowledge Representation Systems”, DFKI Research Report RR-90–06, DFKI, Postfach 2080, D-6750 Kaiserslautern, West-Germany, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollunder, B.: “Hybrid Inferences in KL-ONE-based Knowledge Representation Systems”, in the Proceedings of the 14th German Workshop on Artificial Intelligence, Springer-Verlag, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollunder, B., Nutt, W.: “Subsumption Algorithms for Concept Languages”, DFKI Research Report RR-90–04, DFKI, Postfach 2080, D-6750 Kaiserslautern, West-Germany, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollunder, B., Nutt, W.: “Subsumption Algorithms for Concept Languages” in the Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Pitman Publishing, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huet, G.: “Constrained Resolution — A Complete Method for Higher Order Logic”, Ph.D. Thesis, Case Western University, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffar, J., Lassez, J.-L.: “Constrained Logic Programming”, Proceedings of ACM Symp. on Principles of Programming Languages, 111–119, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levesque, H. J., Brachman, R. J.: “Expressiveness and Tractability in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning”, Computational Intelligence, 3, pp. 78–93, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, R., Bates, R.: “The Loom Knowledge Representation Language”, Technical Report ISI/RS-87–188, University of Southern California, Information Science Institute, Marina del Rey, Cal., 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nebel, B.: “Reasoning and Revision in Hybrid Representation Systems”, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, LNAI 422, Springer-Verlag, 1990.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Oberschelp, A.: “Untersuchungen zur mehrsortigen Quantorenlogik”, Mathematische Annalen, 145:297–333, 1962.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Quillian, R. M.: “Semantic Memory”, in Semantic Information Processing (ed. M. Minsky), pp. 216–270, MIT-Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J.A.: “A Machine Oriented Logic Based on the Resolution Principle”, J. ACM, 12(1), pp. 23–41, 1965.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, A.: “Ueber deduktive Theorien mit mehreren Sorten von Grunddingen”, Mathematische Annalen, 115:485–506, 1938.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, A.: “Die Zulässigkeit der Behandlung mehrsortiger Theorien mittels der üblichen einsortigen Prädikatenlogik”, Mathematische Annalen, 123:187–200, 1951.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Schauß, M., Smolka, G.: “Attributive Concept Descriptions with Unions and Complements”, SEKI Report SR-88–21, FB Informatik, University of Kaiserslautern, West Germany, 1988. To appear in Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Schauß, M.: “Computational Aspects of an Order-sorted Logic with Term Declarations”, Lecture Notes on Artificial Intelligence, LNAI 395, Springer, 1989

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Smolka, G.: “Logic Programming over Polymorphically Order-sorted Types”, Dissertation, Universität Kaiserslautern, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stickel, M. E.: “Automated Deduction by Theory Resolution”, Journal of Automated Reasoning, 1:333–355, 1985.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vilain., M. B.: “The Restricted Language Architecture of a Hybrid Representation System”, in Proceeding of the 9th IJCAI, pp. 547–551, Los Angeles, Cal., 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther, C.: “A Many-sorted Calculus Based on Resolution and Paramodulation”, Research Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Pitman, Morgan Kaufman Publishers, 1987.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, C.: “Many-Sorted Unification”, J. ACM, 35(1), pp. 1–17, 1988.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Weidenbach, C., Ohlbach H.-J.: “A Resolution Calculus with Dynamic Sort Structures and Partial Functions”, Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Pitman Publishing, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 ECSC — EEC — EAEC, Brussels — Luxembourg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baader, F., Bürckert, HJ., Hollunder, B., Nutt, W., Siekmann, J.H. (1990). Concept Logics. In: Lloyd, J.W. (eds) Computational Logic. ESPRIT Basic Research Series. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76274-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76274-1_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-76276-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-76274-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics