Skip to main content

The Classification of Organisms — The Hurdle of Homology —

  • Conference paper
Conceptual and Numerical Analysis of Data
  • 240 Accesses

Abstract

Homology is one of the central concepts in biological systematics, irrespective of the”systematic schools”, be it phenetic, cladistic or evolutionary (for a discussion of these terms see, for instance, Felsenstein, 1983). That hypotheses on phylogenetic relations should always be based on homologous characters (e.g. Rieppel, 1980) is almost a truism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ax, P. (1984). Das phylogenetische System. Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookstein, F. and Chernoff, B., Elder, R., Humphries, J., Smith, G., Strauss, R. (1985). Morphometrics in evolutionary biology. Special Publ. No. 15, The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. (1983). Methods for inferring phylogenies: a statistical view. pp. 315–334 In Numerical Taxonomy (J. Felsenstein ed.). NATO ASI Series, Vol. G 1. Springer, Berlin.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W. (1950). Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W. (1965). Phylogenetic Systematics. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 10: 97 – 116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W. (1966). Phylogenetic Systematics. University of Illinois Press. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W. (1969). Die Stammesgeschichte der Insekten. Kramer & Co., Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W. (1974). Kritische Bemerkungen zur Frage”Ciadistic analysis or cladistic classification?”. Z. zool. Syst. Evolut.-forsch. 12: 279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W. (1982). Phylogenetische Systematik. Parey Verlag, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W. (1984). Aufgaben und Probleme stammesgeschichtlicher Forschung. Parey Verlag, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillis, D.M. (1987). Molecular versus morphological approaches to systematics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osche, G. (1973). Das Homologisieren als eine grundlegende Methode der Phylogenetik. Aufs. u. Red. senckenb. naturf. Ges. 24: 155–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, R. (1843). Lectures on the comparative anatomy and physiology of the invertebrate animals. Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C. (1982). Morphological characters and homology. pp. 21–74 In Problems of phylogenetic reconstruction (K.A. Joysey and A.E. Friday, eds). Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C. (1987) (ed.). Molecules and morphology in evolution: conflict or compromise? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C. (1988). Homology in classical and molecular biology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5: 603–625.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. (1976). Logik der Forschung. Verlag Mohr, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remane, A. (1952). Die Grundlagen des natürlichen Systems, der vergleichenden Anatomie und der Phylogenetik. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remane, A. (1961). Gedanken zum Problem: Homologie und Analogie, Praeadaptation und Parallelität. Zool. Anz. 179: 80–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, R. (1975). Die Ordnung des Lebendigen. Parey Verlag, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, R. (1980). Homologien; ihre Gründe und Erkenntnisgründe. Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. 1980: 164–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieppel, O.C. (1980). Homology, a deductive concept. Z. zool. Syst. Evolut.-forsch. 18: 315–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieppel, O.G. (1988). Fundamentals of comparative biology. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, V.L. (1984). On homology. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 22: 13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G.G. (1961). Principles of animal taxonomy. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P.H.A. (1983). Philosophy and method in biological classification. pp. 22–37 In Numerical Taxonomy (J. Felsenstein ed.). NATO ASI Series, Vol. G 1. Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P.H.A. and Sokal, R.R. (1973). Numerical taxonomy. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sudhaus, W. (1980). Problembereiche der Homologienforschung. Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. 1980: 177–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Valen, L.M. (1982). Homology and causes. J. Morphol. 173: 305–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, W. (1973). Homologie und Typus in der Biologie. Fischer Verlag, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E.O. (1978). The evolutionary species concept reconsidered. Syst. Zool. 27: 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E.O. (1981). Phylogenetics. The theory and practice of phy-logenetic systematics. Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Erdelen, W. (1989). The Classification of Organisms — The Hurdle of Homology —. In: Optiz, O. (eds) Conceptual and Numerical Analysis of Data. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75040-3_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75040-3_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-51641-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75040-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics