Abstract
Homology is one of the central concepts in biological systematics, irrespective of the”systematic schools”, be it phenetic, cladistic or evolutionary (for a discussion of these terms see, for instance, Felsenstein, 1983). That hypotheses on phylogenetic relations should always be based on homologous characters (e.g. Rieppel, 1980) is almost a truism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ax, P. (1984). Das phylogenetische System. Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.
Bookstein, F. and Chernoff, B., Elder, R., Humphries, J., Smith, G., Strauss, R. (1985). Morphometrics in evolutionary biology. Special Publ. No. 15, The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.
Felsenstein, J. (1983). Methods for inferring phylogenies: a statistical view. pp. 315–334 In Numerical Taxonomy (J. Felsenstein ed.). NATO ASI Series, Vol. G 1. Springer, Berlin.
Hennig, W. (1950). Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. Berlin.
Hennig, W. (1965). Phylogenetic Systematics. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 10: 97 – 116.
Hennig, W. (1966). Phylogenetic Systematics. University of Illinois Press. Chicago.
Hennig, W. (1969). Die Stammesgeschichte der Insekten. Kramer & Co., Frankfurt.
Hennig, W. (1974). Kritische Bemerkungen zur Frage”Ciadistic analysis or cladistic classification?”. Z. zool. Syst. Evolut.-forsch. 12: 279–294.
Hennig, W. (1982). Phylogenetische Systematik. Parey Verlag, Hamburg.
Hennig, W. (1984). Aufgaben und Probleme stammesgeschichtlicher Forschung. Parey Verlag, Hamburg.
Hillis, D.M. (1987). Molecular versus morphological approaches to systematics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 23–42.
Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Osche, G. (1973). Das Homologisieren als eine grundlegende Methode der Phylogenetik. Aufs. u. Red. senckenb. naturf. Ges. 24: 155–165.
Owen, R. (1843). Lectures on the comparative anatomy and physiology of the invertebrate animals. Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, London.
Patterson, C. (1982). Morphological characters and homology. pp. 21–74 In Problems of phylogenetic reconstruction (K.A. Joysey and A.E. Friday, eds). Academic Press, London.
Patterson, C. (1987) (ed.). Molecules and morphology in evolution: conflict or compromise? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Patterson, C. (1988). Homology in classical and molecular biology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5: 603–625.
Popper, K.R. (1976). Logik der Forschung. Verlag Mohr, Tübingen.
Remane, A. (1952). Die Grundlagen des natürlichen Systems, der vergleichenden Anatomie und der Phylogenetik. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig.
Remane, A. (1961). Gedanken zum Problem: Homologie und Analogie, Praeadaptation und Parallelität. Zool. Anz. 179: 80–98.
Riedl, R. (1975). Die Ordnung des Lebendigen. Parey Verlag, Hamburg.
Riedl, R. (1980). Homologien; ihre Gründe und Erkenntnisgründe. Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. 1980: 164–176.
Rieppel, O.C. (1980). Homology, a deductive concept. Z. zool. Syst. Evolut.-forsch. 18: 315–319.
Rieppel, O.G. (1988). Fundamentals of comparative biology. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel.
Roth, V.L. (1984). On homology. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 22: 13–29.
Simpson, G.G. (1961). Principles of animal taxonomy. Columbia University Press, New York.
Sneath, P.H.A. (1983). Philosophy and method in biological classification. pp. 22–37 In Numerical Taxonomy (J. Felsenstein ed.). NATO ASI Series, Vol. G 1. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
Sneath, P.H.A. and Sokal, R.R. (1973). Numerical taxonomy. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.
Sudhaus, W. (1980). Problembereiche der Homologienforschung. Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. 1980: 177–187.
Van Valen, L.M. (1982). Homology and causes. J. Morphol. 173: 305–312.
Voigt, W. (1973). Homologie und Typus in der Biologie. Fischer Verlag, Jena.
Wiley, E.O. (1978). The evolutionary species concept reconsidered. Syst. Zool. 27: 17–26.
Wiley, E.O. (1981). Phylogenetics. The theory and practice of phy-logenetic systematics. Wiley and Sons, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Erdelen, W. (1989). The Classification of Organisms — The Hurdle of Homology —. In: Optiz, O. (eds) Conceptual and Numerical Analysis of Data. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75040-3_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75040-3_36
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-51641-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75040-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive