Skip to main content

Professional Summarizing

  • Chapter
Summarizing Information

Abstract

Most people occasionally summarize information when they report about a movie or the discussions of a meeting. Students often summarize course materials in order to understand and memorize them better. There are also professions where summarization tasks occur without being regarded as main activities, for instance in journalism. Reporters summarize, for instance, a parliamentary debate or the state of affairs in any other domain, say the financial situation of the national social security system. Researchers typically begin their papers by summarizing the state of knowledge, in order to make their own contribution more easily accessible to readers. In both professions it is advantageous to master the most important summarization techniques, but neither journalists nor researchers regard themselves as summarization professionals. Their main job is to find and to transmit knowledge. Non-specialist summarizing like theirs has been treated in the previous chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. American National Standards Institute (1979): American national standard for writing abstracts. ANSI Z39.14–1979

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mills, J.; Broughton, V. (1977): Bliss bibliographic classification. 2nd edn. London: Butterworths

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beghtol, C. (1986): Bibliographic classification theory and text linguistics: Aboutness analysis, intertextuality and the cognitive act of classifying documents. J. Documentation 42(2)84–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bereiter, C; Scardamaglia, M. (1987): The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  5. Borko, H.; Bernier, C.L. (1975): Abstracting concepts and methods. New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brewer, W.F.; Nakamura, G.V. (1984): The nature and functions of schemas. WYER84, vol. 1, pp. 119–160

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carver, N.; Lesser, V. (1994): Evolution of blackboard control architectures. Expert Systems with Applications 7:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cremmins, E. T. (1996): The art of abstracting. 2nd edn. Arlington, VA: Information Resources Press

    Google Scholar 

  9. Diesing, P. (1971): Patterns of discovery in the social sciences. Chicago: Aldine Atherton

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dijk, T. A. van (1980): Macrostructures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dillon, A. (1991): Readers’ models of text structures: The case of academic articles. Int. J. Man-Machine Studies 35:913–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. DIN Deutsches Institut fur Normung (1988): DIN 1426: Inhaltsangaben von Dokumenten [Contents of documents]. Berlin: Beuth

    Google Scholar 

  13. Engelmore, R.; Morgan, T. eds. (1988): Blackboard systems. Wokingham, UK: Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ericsson, K.A.; Simon, H.A. (1980): Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review 87:215–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ericsson, K.A.; Simon, H.A. (1984): Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  16. Farrow, J.F. (1991): A cognitive process model for document indexing. J. Documentation 47:2,149–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Glaser, B.G.; Strauss, A.L. (1980): The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. 11th edn. 1980. New York: Aldine Atherton

    Google Scholar 

  18. Groeben, N.; Scheele, B. (1988): Argumente für eine Psychologie des reflexiven Subjekts [Arguments for a psychology of the reflexive subject]. Darmstadt: Steinkopff

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hammond, K.J. (1990): Case-based planning: A framework for planning from experience. Cognitive Science 14:385–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hayes, J.R.; Flower, L.S.(1980): Identifying the Organization of Writing Processes. Gregg, L.W.; Steinberg, E.R. eds. (1980): Cognitive processes in writing, pp. 17–35. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hovi, I. (1989): The cognitive structure of classification work. Koskiala, S.; Lauvno, R., eds. (1989): Information * Knowledge * Evolution. Proc. of the 44th FID congress, pp. 121–132. Amsterdam: North-Holland

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hovy, E. (1993): Automated discourse generation using discourse structure relations. Artificial Intelligence 63:341–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hutchins, W.J. (1977): On the Problem of Aboutness in Document Analysis. J. Informatics 1:1,17–35

    Google Scholar 

  24. (IS085) ISO (1985): ISO Standard 5963–1985(E) Documentation — Methods for examining documents, determining their subjects, and selecting index terms

    Google Scholar 

  25. Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983): Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jones, K.P. (1983): How do we index?: a report of some Aslib Informatics group activity. J. Documentation 39:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kintsch, W.; Dijk, T.A. van (1978): Toward a model of text comprehension. Psychological Review 85:363–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kintsch, W.; Dijk, T.A. van (1983): Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. Orlando, FL: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lancaster, F.W. (1991): Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice. London: Library Association

    Google Scholar 

  30. Langridge, D.W. (1989): Subject analysis: Principles and procedures. London: Bowker-Saur

    Google Scholar 

  31. Liddy, E.D. (1991): The discourse-level structure of empirical abstracts: An exploratory study. Information Processing and Management 27:1,55–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lincoln, Y.S.; Guba, E.G. (1985): Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lindsay, P.; Norman, D.A. (1981): Einführung in die Psychologie [Original English title: Human information processing]. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mann, W.C.; Thompson, S.A. (1988): Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8:3,243–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mayring, P. (1990): Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung [Introduction to qualitative social research]. München: Psychologie-Verlags-Union

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pinto Molina, M. (1994): Interdisciplinary approaches to the concept and practice of written text documentary content analysis (WTDCA). J. Documentation 50:2,111–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pinto Molina, M. (1995): Documentary abstracting: Toward a methodological model. J. American Society for Information Science 46:3,225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Norman, D.A. (1983): Some observations on mental models, in Gentner, D.; Stevens, A.L. eds. (1983): Mental models, pp. 7–14. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  39. Paris, S.G.; Lipson, M.Y.; Wixson, K.K. (1983): Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology 8:293–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pugh, A.K. (1978): Silent reading. An introduction to its study and teaching. London: Heinemann

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rowley, J. (1982/88): Abstracting and indexing. London: Bingley

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rumelhart, D.E. (1984): Schema and the cognitive system. WYER84, vol.1, pp. 161–189

    Google Scholar 

  43. Schreiber, G., Wielinga, B., & Breuker, J. (1993): KADS. A principled approach to knowledge based system development. London: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  44. Strauss, A. L. (1987): Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Thorndyke, P.W.; Hayes-Roth, B. (1979): The use of schemata in the acquisition and transfer of knowledge. Cognitive Psychology 11:82–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Winograd, T. (1983): Language as a cognitive process. Reading, MA: Ad-dison-Wesley

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Wyer, R.S.; Srull, T.K., eds. (1984): Handbook of social cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Endres-Niggemeyer, B. et al. (1998). Professional Summarizing. In: Summarizing Information. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72025-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72025-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-72027-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-72025-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics