Abstract
Within the past few years there have been many reviews of insect chemoreception detailing advances that have resulted from electrophysiological, electron microscopical, and biochemical analyses. Antedating these are reviews covering the morphological era of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The history of the transition period between pre- and post-electrophysiology is less well documented. This is the period during which Kenneth Roeder worked and contributed so influentially to the field of insect physiology and behavior.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams JR (1961) The location and histology of the contact chemoreceptors of the stable fly, Stomoxys calcitrans L. Doctoral Dissertation Rutgers Univ, New Brunswick NJ
Adrian ED (1928) The basis of sensation. WW Norton NY
Adrian ED (1932) The activity of the optic ganglion ofDytiscus marginales. J Physiol 75: 26
Boistel J, Coraboeuf E (1953) L’activité électrique dans l’antenne isolée de lepidoptére au cours de l’étude de l’olfaction. CR Soc Biol Paris 147: 1172–1175
Dethier VG (1941) The function of the antennal receptors in lepidopterous larvae. Biol Bull 80: 403–414
Dethier VG (1947) The response of hymenopterous parasites to chemical stimulation of the ovipositor. J Exp Zool 105: 199–208
Dethier VG (1954) The physiology of olfaction in insects. Ann NY Acad Sci 58: 139–157
Dethier VG (1955) Mode of action of sugar baited fly traps. J Econ Ent 48: 235–239
Dethier VG (1975) The monarch revisited. J Kansas Ent Soc 48: 129–140
Dethier VG, Chadwick LE (1948) Chemoreception in insects. Physiol Rev 28: 220–254
Dethier VG, Crnjar R (1982) Candidate codes in the gustatory system of caterpillars. J Gen Physiol 79: 549–569
Dethier VH, Wolbarsht ML (1956) The electronmicroscopy of chemosensory hairs. Experientia 12: 335
Erlanger J, Gasser HS (1937) Electrical signs of nervous activity. Univ Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia
Frisch K von (1921) Über den Sitz des Geruchssinnes bei Insekten. Zool Jahrb Zool Physiol 38: 449–516
Frisch K von (1926) Vergleichende Physiologie des Geruchs-und Geschmackssinnes. Handb norm pathol Physiol 11: 203–239
Grabowski CT, Dethier VG (1954) The structure of the tarsal chemoreceptors of the blowfly, Phormia regina Meigen. J Morph 94: 1–20
Hansen K (1968) Untersuchungen über den Mechanismus der Zucker-Perzeption bei Fliegen. Habilitationsschrift Univ Heidelberg
Hansen K (1969) The mechanism of sugar reception a biochemical investigation. In: Pfaffman C (ed) Olfaction and taste III. Rockefeller Univ Press, New York, pp 382–391
Hansen K, Kühner J (1972) Properties of a possible receptor protein of the fly’s sugar receptor. In: Schneider D (ed) Olfaction and taste IV. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsges MBM, Stuttgart, pp 350–356
Hartline HK (1928) A quantitative and descriptive study of the electric response to illumination of the arthropod eye. Am J Physiol 83: 466–483
Hodgson ES, Roeder KD (1957) Electrophysiological studies of arthropod chemoreception. J Cell Comp Physiol 48: 51–75
Hodgson ES, Lettvin JY, Roeder KD (1955) Physiology of a primary chemoreceptor unit. Science 122: 417–418
Koizumi O, Kijima M, Morita H (1974) Characterization of a glucosidase at the tips of the chemosensory setae of the fly, Phormia regina. J Insect Physiol 20: 925–935
Lloyd DC (1940) Host selection by hymenopterous parasites of the moth Plutella maculipennis Curtis. Proc Roy Soc London 128: 451–484
Minnich DE (1926) The organs of taste on the proboscis of the blowfly, Phormia regina Meigen. Anat Rec 34: 126
Minnich DE (1929) The chemical senses of insects. Quart Rev Biol 4: 100–112
Morita H (1972) Primary processes of insect chemoreception. Adv Biophys 3: 161–198
Morita H, Doira S, Takeda K, Kuwabara M (1957) Electrical response of contact chemoreceptor on tarsus of the butterfly, Vanessa indica. Mem Fac Sci Kyushu Univ Ser E (Biol) 2: 119–139
Pfaffmann C (1941) Gustatory afferent impulses. J Cell Comp Physiol 17: 243–258
Réaumur de AF (1734–1742) Mémoires pour servir a l’histoire des insectes. I. VI, Paris, Imprroy
Roeder KD, Weiant EA (1948) The effect of DDT on sensory and motor structures in the cockroach leg. J Cell Comp Physiol 32: 175–186
Roys C (1954) Olfactory nerve potentials a direct measure of chemoreception. Ann NY Acad Sci 58: 250–255
Salt G (1937) The sense used by Trichogramma to distinguish between parasitized and unparasitized hosts. Proc Roy Soc London 122: 55–75
Schneider D (1955) Mikro-Elektroden registrieren die elektrischen Impulse einzelner Sinnesnervenzellen der Schmetterlingsantenne. Ind Elektron Forsch Fertigung 3: 3–7
Smyth T, Roys CC (1954) Chemoreception in insects and the action of DDT. Biol Bull 108: 66–76
Varley GC (1941) On the search for hosts and the egg distribution of some chalcid parasites of the knapweed gall-fly. Parasitology 33: 47–66
Wolbarsht ML (1957) Water taste in Phormia. Science 125: 1248
Wolbarsht ML, Dethier VG (1958) Electrical activity in the chemoreceptors of the blowfly. I. Responses to chemical and mechanical stimulation. J Gen Physiol 42: 393–412
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dethier, V.G. (1983). K. D. Roeder and the History of Chemoreception. In: Huber, F., Markl, H. (eds) Neuroethology and Behavioral Physiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69271-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69271-0_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-69273-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-69271-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive