Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Podiumsdiskussionen

Die Frühgeburt von Einlingsschwangerschaften -Prävention und Therapie (Moderation: K.-H. Wulf)

  • Conference paper
51. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

  • 21 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Frühgeburt ist nach wie vor das zentrale Problem der moderen Geburtshilfe und Perinatologie. Sowohl die perinatale Mortalität als auch die einschlägige Morbidität sind vorrangig durch die Frühgeburtlichkeit belastet. Der Anteil der Frühgeburten an der perinatalen Mortalität liegt unverändert bei 65–70 %. Insgesamt stellt das Frühgeborenenproblem auch eine erhebliche volkswirtschaftliche Belastung dar. Erhöhte Anstrengungen im Rahmen einer primären und sekundären Prävention sind unbedingt erforderlich.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

Einleitung

  1. Creasy RK (1991) Lifestyle influences on prematurity. J Dev Physiol 15:15–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Creasy RK (1993) Preterm birth prevention: where are we? Am J Obstet Gynecol 168(4): 1223–1230

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dudenhausen JW (1994) Die Bedeutung sozialer Faktoren für die Frühgeburtlichkeit. Perinatal Med 6:117–120

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dudenhausen JW, Büscher U (1996) Zuverlässigkeit der Abschätzung des Frühgeburtsrisikos. Gynäkologe 7:585–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hedegaard M, Brink Henriksen T, Sabroe S, Secher NJ (1993) Psychological distress in pregnancy and preterm delivery. BMJ 307:234–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kirby RS, Swanson ME, Kelleher KJ, Bradley RH, Casey PH (1993) Identifying at-risk children for early Intervention services: lessons from the Infant Health and Development Program. J Pediatr 122:680–686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Künzel W (1995) Epidemiologie und Pathophysiologie der Frühgeburt. In: Künzel W, Kirschbaum M (Hrsg) Gießener Gynäkologische Fortbildung 1995. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, S 57–70

    Google Scholar 

  8. Papiernik E, Bouyer J, Dreyfus J (1985) Risk factors for preterm births and results of a prevention policy. The Hagenau Perinatal Study 1971-1982. Pediatrics 76:154–158

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rettwitz-Volk W (1996) Epidemiologische Aspekte der Frühgeburtlichkeit. Perinatal Med 5:15–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shiono PH, Klebanoff MA (1993) A review of risk scoring for preterm birth. Clin Perinatol 20(1): 107–125

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Taren DL, Graven SN (1991) The sensitivity and specificity of a preterm risk score for various patient populations. J Perinatol 11(2): 130–136

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Thieme C (1991) Geburtshilfe in Bayern - Frühgeburt. BPE Jahresbericht 1991, S 91-94

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wulf K-H (1993) Effizienz und Inanspruchnahme der Schwangerenvorsorge. Perinatal Med 5:73–77

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wulf KH (1995) Frühgeburt und Grenzen. Arch Gynecol Obstet 257:447–492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Psychosoziale Betreuung bei drohender Frühgeburt

  1. Ader R, Feiten DL, Cohen N (eds) (1991) Psychoneuroimmunology. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander F (1977) Psychosomatische Medizin. De Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  3. Erdmann G (1983) Zur Beeinflußbarkeit emotionaler Prozesse durch vegetative Variation. Beltz, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gray J (1971) The psychology of fear and stress. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hennig J (1994) Die psychobiologische Bedeutung des sekretorischen Immunglobulin A im Speichel. Waxmann, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hoffmann B (1992) Handbuch des Autogenen Trainings. Deutscher Taschenbuch-Verlag, München

    Google Scholar 

  7. Koller S (1983) Risikofaktoren der Schwangerschaft. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Lobel M (1994) Conceptualizations, measurement and effects of prenatal maternal stress on birth outcomes. J Behav Med 17: 225–272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lukesch H (1997) Sozialmedizinische und psychosomatische Aspekte der Frühgeburtlichkeit. In: Künzel W, Wulf KH (Hrsg) Klinik der Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Bd 7. Urban & Schwarzenberg, München

    Google Scholar 

  10. Selye H (1956) The stress of life. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

Frühgeburten und Infektionen — Prophylaxe und Therapie

  1. Cohen I, Veille J-C, Calkins BM (1990) Improved pregnancy outcome following successful treatment of chlamydial infection. JAMA 263:3160–3163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Egarter C, Leitich H, Karas H, Wieser F, Husslein P, Kaider A, Schemper M (1996) Antibiotic treatment in preterm premature rupture of membranes and neonatal mobidity: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174:589–597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hauth JC, Goldenberg RL, Andrews WW, Dußard MB, Copper RL (1995) Reduced incidence of preterm delivery with metronidazole and erythromycin in women with bacterial vaginosis. N Engl J Med 333:1732–1736

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Joesoef MR, Hillier SL, Wiknjosastro G et al. (1995) Intravaginal Clindamycin treatment for bacterial vaginosis: effects on preterm delivery and low birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:1527–1531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Martius J, Roos T (1996) The role of urogenital tract infections in the etiology of preterm birth: a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 258:1–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mercer BM, Arheart KL (1995) Antimicrobial therapy in expectant management of preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Lancet 346:1271–1279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Morales WJ, Schorr S, Albritton J (1994) Effect of metronidazole in patients with preterm birth in preceding pregnancy and bacterial vaginosis: a placebo-controlled, doubleblind study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:345–349

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Romero R, Oyarzun E, Mazor M, Sirtori M, Hobbins JC, Bracken M (1989) Meta-analysis of the relationship between asymptomatic bacteriuria and preterm delivery/low birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 73:576–582

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Roos T, Martius J (1996) Pathogenese der Frühgeburt: Immunologische Aspekte. Gynäkologe 29:114–121

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ryan GM, Abdella TN, McNeeley SG, Baselski VS, Drummond DE (1990) Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnancy and effect of treatment on outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:34–39

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schachter J, Sweet RL, Grossman M, Landers D, Robbie M, Bishop E (1986) Experience with the routine use of Erythromycin for chlamydial infections in pregnancy. N Engl J Med 314:276–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schuchat A, Whitney C, Zangwill K (1996) Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease: a public health perspective. MMWR 45/No.RR-7:l-24

    Google Scholar 

Frühsymptome der drohenden Frühgeburt — Diagnostik

  1. Buekens P et al. (1994) Randomised controlled trial of routine cervical examinations in pregnancy. Lancet 344:841

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Iams JD et al. (1996) The lenght of the cervix and the risk of spontenious premature delivery. N Engl J Med 334:567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartnicky J et al. (1996). Fetal fibronectin in original specimens predicts preterm delivery and very-low-birth infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174:971

    Article  Google Scholar 

Screening mit Ultraschall in der Schwangerschaft: Pro und Kontra?

  1. Donald I (1965) Ultrasonic echo sounding in obstetrical and gynecological diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 93:935–941

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hofmann D, Holländer HJ, Weiser P (1967) The gynaecological and obstetrical importance of ultrasonic diagnosis. Gynaecologia 164:24–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sohn C, Holzgreve W (1995) Ultraschall in Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Thieme, Stuttgart New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Richtlinien des Bundesausschusses der Ärzte und Krankenkassen über die ärztliche Betreuung während der Schwangerschaft und nach der Entbindung. Mutterschaftsrichtlinien. Neue Fassung vom 10. Dez. 1985

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ewigman BG, Crane JP, Frigoletto FD, LeFevre ML, Bain RP, McNellis D, The RADIUS Study Group: A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasound Screening in a low risk population: impact on perinatal outcome. N Engl J Med 169:483-489

    Google Scholar 

  6. Romero R (1993) Routine obstetric ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 3:303–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Saari-Kemppainen A, Karjalainen O, Ylostalo P, Heinonen OP (1990) Ultrasound Screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage Screening in pregnancy. The Helsinki Ultrasound Trial. Lancet 336:387–39

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosendahl H, Kivenen S (1989) Antenatal detection of congenital malformations by routine ultrasonography. Obstet Gynecol 73:947–951

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Levi S, Hyjazi Y, Schaaps JP, Defoort P, Coulon R, Buekens P (1991) Sensitivity and specificity of routine antenatal Screening for congenital anomalies by ultrasound: the Belgian multicentric study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1: 102–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bucher HC, Schmidt JG (1993) Does routine ultrasound scanning improve outcome in pregnancy? Metaanalysis of various outcome measures. Br Med J 307: 13–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Frigoletto FD (1996) Commentary on routine Ob ultrasound. ISUOG: März/April 1996

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB, Ledger WJ (1996) Advocacy for routine obstetric ultrasound. ISUOG: März/April 1996

    Google Scholar 

  13. Holzgreve W (1990) Sonographie Screening for anatomic defects. Seminars in Perinatology 14:504–513

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Eik-Nes SH (1995) Fetal structural disorders - the large series are emerging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 5:364–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Eik-Nes SH (1993) The fetal examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 3:83–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rulin MC, Bornstein SG, Campbell JD (1993) The reliability of ultrasonography in the management of spontaneous abortion, clinically thought to be complete: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168:12–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brand IR, Kaminopetros P, Cave M, Irving HC, Lilford RJ (1994) Specificity of antenatal ultrasound in the Yorkshire Region: a prospective study of 2261 ultrsound detected anomalies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101:392–397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Devore GR (1996) Financial implications of routine Screening ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 7:307–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Leivo T, Tuominen R, Saari-Kemppainen A, Ylöstalo P, Karjalainen O, Heinonen OP (1996) Cost-effectiveness of one-stage ultrasound Screening in pregnancy: a report from the Helsinki ultrasound trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 7:309–314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nicolaides KN (1994) Screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities: need to change the rules. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 4:353–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Campbell S, Reading AE, Cox DN et al. (1982) Ultrasound scanning in pregnancy: the short-term psychological effects of early real-time scans. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1-2:57–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Field T, Sandberg D, Quetel TA et al. (1985) Effects of ultrasound feedback on pregnancy anxiety, fetal activity, and neonatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 66:525–528

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Benzie R, Eng F (1996) Time for an electronic colleague?Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 7:89–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Serummarker zur Erkennung von fetalen Chromosomenstörungen

  1. Cuckle HS et al. (1995) Urinary beta-core human chorionic gonadotrophin: a new approach to Down’s Syndrome Screening. Prenat Diagn 14:953–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cuckle HS (1996) Recent advances in prenatal diagnosis for aneuploidy. 1-3 May, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  3. Palomaki G et al. (1995) Risk-based prenatal Screening for trisomy 18 using alpha-fetoprotein, unconjugated oestriol and human chorionic gonadotropin. Prenat Diagn 15: 713–723

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Salier DN et al. (1992) Multiple-marker Screening in pregnancies with hydropic and nonhydropic Turner Syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 167:1021–1024

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sancken U, Bahner D (1995) The effect of thermal instability of intact human chorionic gonadotropin (ihCG) on the application of its free beta-subunit (free beta hCG) as a serum marker in Down Syndrome Screening. Prenat Diagn 15:731–738

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wald NJ et al. (1996) Serum Screening for Down’s Syndrome between 8 and 14 weeks of pregnancy. International Prenatal Screening Research Group. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103: 407–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wald NJ et al. (1996) Prenatal Screening for Down’s Syndrome using inhibin-A as a serum marker. Prenat Diagn 16:143–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Angeborene Herzfehler — Möglichkeiten eines Screenings

  1. Buskens E, Stewart PA, Hess J, Grobbee DE, Wladimiroff JW (1996) Efficacy of fetal cardiography an yield by risk category. Obstet Gynecol 87:423–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Buskens E, Grobbee DE, Wladimiroff JW, Hess J (1996) Routine Screening for congenital heart disease: a prospective study in the Netherlands. In: Wladimiroff JW, Pilu G (eds) Ultrasound and the fetal heart. Parthenon Publishing, New York, pp 71–80

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gembruch U, Chaoui R (1997) Möglichkeiten und Grenzen eines Screeningprogramms. Pränatale Diagnostik fetaler Herzfehler durch Untersuchung von „High-RiskŇ und „Low-RiskŇ-Kollektiven. Gynäkologie 30:191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stümpflen I, Stümpflen A, Wimmer M, Bernaschek G (1996) Effects of detailed fetal echocardiography as part of routine prenatal ultrasonographic Screening on detection of congenital heart disease. Lancet 348:845–857

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. K.-H. Wulf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Börgens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Martius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Husslein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. Linder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. L. Spätling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. W. Holzgreve
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. I. Hösli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. S. Tercanli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. I. Bartels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. U. Gembruch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. J. Wisser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Zentrum für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikstraße 32, 35392, Gießen, Germany

    Wolfgang Künzel

  2. Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Universität zu Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany

    Klaus Diedrich

  3. Klinikum Kreis Herford, Frauenklinik, Schwarzmoorstraße 70, 32049, Herford, Germany

    Manfred Hohmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wulf, KH. et al. (1997). Podiumsdiskussionen. In: Künzel, W., Diedrich, K., Hohmann, M. (eds) 51. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60840-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60840-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64578-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60840-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation