Skip to main content

Have Recent Studies Rendered Environmental Externality Valuation Irrelevant?

  • Conference paper
Social Costs and Sustainability

Abstract

Three recent major studies of electric utility environmental externalities, one for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE Study), a second, combined in some respects with the DOE Study, by the European Community (EC Study), and the third for New York State (NY Study), all find that the externalities measurable through damage cost valuation of damages to society from electric utility operations are a fraction of a cent per kilowatt-hour. This paper concludes that these studies fail to value such a significant proportion of externalities, and so undervalue the externalities for which values are calculated, as to render the values adopted irrelevant to any policy formulation or resource selection decisions. If externalities are not more fully valued, then it is posited that environmental decision making throughout the world is likely to be distorted, with possible serious consequences to public health and the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Clement 1989: Clement Associates Under Contract No. 205–88-0608 for Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry (ATSDR), U.S. Public Health Service in collaboration with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), December 1989, Toxicological Profile for Mercury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockery 1993: Dockery, et. al. (December 1993), An Association Between Air Pollution and Mortality in Six U.S. Cities, The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 329, N. 24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA 1984: Environmental Criterial & Assessment Office, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA-600/8–83-013F, August 1984, Final Report, Health Assessment Document for Manganese.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA 1989: Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards (1989), Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone Assessment of Scientific & Technical Information, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA 1990: Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-450/2–89-022, December 1990, Review of the National Ambient Air Quality for Lead: Assessment of Scientific and Technical Information, OAQPS Staff Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Life Systems 1989: Life Systems, Inc. Under Contract No. 68–02-4228 for Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), U.S. Public Health Service in collaboration with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), March 1989, Toxicological Profile for Arsenic; Toxicological Profile for Cadmium.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC 1991: National Research Council (1991), Rethinking the Ozone Problem in Urban and Regional Air Pollution, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neme 1991: Neme, Chris (November 1991), Electric Utilities and Long-Range Transport of Mercury and Other Toxic Air Pollutants, Center for Clean Air Policy, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • NY Study: RCG/Hagler, Bailly (1993), New York State Environmental Externality Cost Study, Report 1: Externalities Screening and Recommendations; (1994) Report 2: Methodology, Empire State Electric Energy Research Corporation, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • RII 1995: Caverhill, Emily and P. Chernick, Preliminary Critique of the New York State Environmental Externalities Cost Study, Resource Insight, Inc., Boston, MA, April 1995 draft (publication pending).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz 1992: Schwartz, Joel (1992), Beyond LOEL’s Values, and Vote Counting: Methods for Looking at the Shapes and Strengths of Associations (Draft). Working Paper. Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syracuse 1988: Syracuse Research Corporation under Contract No. 68-C8–0004 for Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), U.S. Public Health Service in collaboration with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), December 1988, Toxicological Profiles for Beryllium and Nickel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syracuse 1989: Syracuse Research Corporation under Contract No. 68-C8–0004 for Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), U.S. Public Health Service in collaboration with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), July 1989, Toxicological Profile for Chromium.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ottinger, R.L. (1997). Have Recent Studies Rendered Environmental Externality Valuation Irrelevant?. In: Hohmeyer, O., Rennings, K., Ottinger, R.L. (eds) Social Costs and Sustainability. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60365-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60365-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64372-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60365-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics