Skip to main content

Computed Tomography of Liver Metastases

  • Chapter
Liver Malignancies

Part of the book series: Medical Radiology ((Med Radiol Diagn Imaging))

Abstract

The developments in computed tomograpy (CT) that have taken place over the last 2 decades have dramatically increased the capability to detect and characterize focal liver lesions and have made CT the technique of choice in the evaluation of hepatic metastases. At the same time, advances in the medical and surgical treatment of secondary liver tumors have continued to be a challenge to these advances in radiology. It is clear that a successful outcome depends on knowledge of the size and location of the tumor burden, and accurate radiological assessment is crucial in identifying the subgroups of patients who may benefit from surgery and also in preventing unnecessary radical surgery, with its high morbidity, in those likely to gain only a short term benefit. The correct choice between different CT techniques is crucial to performing an accurate evaluation of liver metastases. The authors focus on specific CT techniques, including bolus dynamic CT, dual and triple phase spiral CT, CT arteriography and arterioportography, delayed CT, high-dose CT and Lipiodol CT. The clinical applications and results of these different techniques are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baron RL (1994) Understanding and optimizing use of contrast media for CT of the liver. AJR 163:323–331

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardino M, Erwin B, Steinberg H; ,et al (1986) Delayed hepatic CT scanning: increased confidence and improved detection of hepatic metastases. Radiology 159:71–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bluemke DA, Soyer P, Fishman EK (1995a) Spiral CT evaluation of Liver Tumors. In: Fishman EK, Jeffrey R-B (eds) Spiral CT: Principles, Techniques and Clinical Applications. Lippincott-Raven, New York, pp 25–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluemke DA, Soyer PA, Chan BW, et al (1995b) Spiral CT during arterial portography: technique and applications. RadioGraphics 15:623–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluemke DA, Soyer P, Fishman EK (1995c) Nontumorous low-attenuation defects in the liver on helical CT durinf arterial portography: frequency, location, and appearance. AJR 164:1141–1145

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonaldi VM, Bret PM, Reinhold C, et al (1995) Helical CT of the liver: value of an early hepatic arterial phase. Radiology 197:357–363

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bressler EL, Alpern MB, Glazer GM, et al (1987) Hpervascular hepatic metastases: CT evaluation. Radiology 162:49–51

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ch’en IY, Katz DS, Jeffrey RB, et al (1997) Do arterial phase helical CT images improve detection or characterization of colorectal liver metastases? Comput Assist Tornogr 21(3):391–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chezmar JL, Rumancik WM, Megibow AJ, et al (1988) diver and abdominal screening in patients with cancer: CT vs MR imaging. Radiology 168:43–49

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choi BI, Freeny P, Heyano S (1996) High-dose helical CT of the liver with computer automated scan technology: comparison with helical CT arterial portography and conventional helical CT. Radiology 201:145–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd GD III, Baron RL (1993) Investigation of contrast enhancement in CT of the liver: the need for improved methods. AIR 160:643–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink S, Chaudhuri K (1991) Physiological considerations in imaging liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Am I Physiol Imaging 6:150–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley WD (1989) Dynamic hepatic CT. Radiology 170:617–622

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick MG, Paulson EK, Nelson RC (1997) Helical CT for detecting focal liver lesions in patients with breast carcinoma: comparison of noncontrast phase, hepatic arterial phase, and portal venous phase. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21:229–235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeny PC (1989) Dynamic hepatic CT. Radiology 170:617–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeny PC (1990) Hepatic CT: techniques, applications and results. In: Ferrucci J, Stark D (eds) Liver imaging: current trends and new techniques. Reading Mass, Andover, pp 28–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeny PC (1997) Helical computed tomography of the liver: techniques, applications and pitfalls. Endoscopy 29:515–523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeny PC, Crane R, Feldman R, et al (1990) Preoperative hepatic for lesion detection using bolus-dynamic CT, CT angiography, delayed iodine CT, and MR. Radiology 177:227–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiken J, Weyman P, Lee J, et al (1989) Detection of focal hepatic metastases: prospective evaluation with CT, delayed CT, CT during arterial portography, and MR imaging. Radiology 171:47–51

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hollett MD, Jeffrey RB, Nino-Murcia M, et al (1995) Dualphase helical CT of the liver: value of arterial phase scans in the detection of small (<1.5 cm) malignant hepatic neoplasm. AIR 164:879–884

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Honda H, Matsuura Y, Murakami J, et al (1992) Differential Diagnosis of hepatic tumors (hepatoma, hemangioma, and metastasis) with CT: value of two-Phase incremental imaging. AIR 159:735–740

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda A, Freeny P, Ryan J, et al (1996) Preoperative high-dose helical CT of the liver: comparison with surgery, pathology, and intraoperative ultrasound in the detection of hypovascular hepatic neoplasm. Radiology 201:420–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Irie T, Kusano S (1996) Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of injection time on time to peak hepatic enhancement. Comput Assist Tomogr 20:633–637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Irie T, Takeshita K, Wada Y, et al (1995) CT evaluation of hepatic tumors: comparison of CT with arterial portography, CT with infusion hepatic arteriography, and simultaneous use of both techniques. AIR 164:1407–1411

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanematsu M, Imaeda T, Hoshi H, et al. (1997) Methodological assessment of combined spiral CT angiography and CT arterial portography. Abdom Imaging 22:404–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lencioni R, Pinto F, Armillotta N, et al (1997) Intrahepatic metastatic nodules of hepatocellular carcinoma detected at Lipiodol-CT: imaging-pathologic correlation. Abdom Imaging 22:253–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lupetin AR, Cammisa BA, Beckman I, et al (1996) Spiral CT during arterial portography. RadioGraphics 16:723–743

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RC, Chezmar IL, Sugarbaker PH, el al (1989) Hepatic tumors: comparison of CT during arterial portography, delayed CT, and MR imaging for preoperative evaluation. Radiology 172:27–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RC, Thompson GH, Chezmar JL, et al (1992) CT during arterial portography: diagnostic pitfalls. RadioGraphics 12:705–718

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ohashi I, Ina H, Gomi N, et al (1995) Hepatic pseudolesion in the left lobe around the falciform ligament at helical CT. Radiology 196:245–249

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver JH, Baron RL (1996) Helical biphasic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: technique, indications, interpretation, and pitfalls. Radiology 201:1–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver JH, Baron RL, Federle MP, Jones BC, Sheng R (1997) Hypervascular liver metastases: do unenhanced and hepatic arterial phase CT images affect tumor detection? Radiology 205:709–715

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olson MC, Posniak HV, Demos TC, et al (1996) Helical computed tomography at 1.5:1 pitch reconstructed at 15 mm and 7 mm intervals for examination of patients with suspected metastatic disease. Can Assoc Radiol J 47:54–58

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paley MR, Ros PR (1997) Hepatic metastases: computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging in 1997. Endoscopy 29:524–538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patten R, Byun JY, Freeny PC (1993) CT of hypervascular hepatic tumors: are unenhanced scans necessary for diagnosis? AIR 161:979–984

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paulson EK, Baker ME, Hilleren DJ, et al (1992) CT arterial portography: causes of technical failure and variable liver enhancement. AIR 159:745–749

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paulson EK, McDermott VG, Cheogan MT, de Long DM, Frederick MC, Nelson MC (1998) Carcinoid metastases to the liver: role of triple-phase helical CT. Radiology 206:143–150

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perkerson RB Jr, Erwin BC, Baumgartner BR, et al (1985) CT densities in delayed iodine hepatic scanning. Radiology 155:445–449

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Platt JF, Francis IR, Ellis JH, et al (1997) Difference in global hepatic enhancement assessed by dynamic CT in normal subjects and patients with hepatic metastases. Comput Assist Tomogr 21:348–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reinig JW, Dwyer AJ, Miller DL, et al (1987) Liver metastases detection: comparative sensitivities of MR imaging and CT scanning. Radiology 162:43–47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman PM, Cooper C, Zeman RK (1995a) Imaging of the liver: a survey update of prevailing techniques for conventional CT scanning. Abdom Imaging 20:348–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman PM, O’Malley J, Tefft MC,et al (1995b) Detection of hepatic metastases by helical CT: effect of different time delays between contrast administration and scanning. AIR 164:619–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman PM, Roberts S, Tefft MC, et al (1995c) Helical CT of the liver: clinical application of an automated computer technique, smartprep, for obtaining images with optimal contrast enhancement. AJR 165:73–78

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman PM, Cooper C, Trock B, et al (1995d) The optimal temporal window for CT of the liver using a time-density analysis: implications for helical (spiral) CT. Comput Assist Tomogr 19:73–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman PM, Roberts SC, Ducic I, et al (1996) Assessment of a technology that permits individualized scan delays on helical hepatic CT;: a technique to improve efficiency in use of contrast media. AIR 167:79–84

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman PM, Kohan L, Ducic I, et al (1998) Imaging of the liver with helical CT;: a survey of scanning techniques. AIR 170:149–152

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Small WC, Mehard WB, Langmo LS, et al (1993) Preoperative determination of the resectability of hepatic tumors: efficacy of CT during arterial portography. AJR 161:319–322

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Small WC, Nelson RC, Bernardino ME, et al (1994) Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of different amounts and injection rates of contrast media on early contrast enhancement. AIR 163:87–92

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soyer P, Bluemke DA, Hruban RH, Sitzmann JV, Fishman EK (1994) Hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: detec-tion and false-positive findings with helical CT during arterial portography. Radiology 193:71–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Urban BA, Fishman EK, Kuhlman JE, et al (1993) Detection of focal hepatic lesions with spiral CT: comparison of 4 and 8 mm interscan spacing. AJR 160:783–787

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen MS, Noordzij J,Feldberg MAM, et al (1996) Focal liver lesions: characterization with triphasic spiral CT. Radiology 201:327–336

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zeman RK, Silverman PM (1995) Abdomen and Pelvis. In: Pennington J, Ramos Englis M (eds) Helical/Sp,ral CT: a practical approach. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp153–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeman RK, Fox SH, Silverman PM, et al (1993) Helical. (spiral) CT of the abdomen. AIR 160:719–725

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simonetti, G., Pocek, M., Maspes, F., Squillaci, E., Serafini, G. (1999). Computed Tomography of Liver Metastases. In: Bartolozzi, C., Lencioni, R. (eds) Liver Malignancies. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58641-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58641-5_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63679-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-58641-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics