Abstract
The developments in computed tomograpy (CT) that have taken place over the last 2 decades have dramatically increased the capability to detect and characterize focal liver lesions and have made CT the technique of choice in the evaluation of hepatic metastases. At the same time, advances in the medical and surgical treatment of secondary liver tumors have continued to be a challenge to these advances in radiology. It is clear that a successful outcome depends on knowledge of the size and location of the tumor burden, and accurate radiological assessment is crucial in identifying the subgroups of patients who may benefit from surgery and also in preventing unnecessary radical surgery, with its high morbidity, in those likely to gain only a short term benefit. The correct choice between different CT techniques is crucial to performing an accurate evaluation of liver metastases. The authors focus on specific CT techniques, including bolus dynamic CT, dual and triple phase spiral CT, CT arteriography and arterioportography, delayed CT, high-dose CT and Lipiodol CT. The clinical applications and results of these different techniques are also discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baron RL (1994) Understanding and optimizing use of contrast media for CT of the liver. AJR 163:323–331
Bernardino M, Erwin B, Steinberg H; ,et al (1986) Delayed hepatic CT scanning: increased confidence and improved detection of hepatic metastases. Radiology 159:71–74
Bluemke DA, Soyer P, Fishman EK (1995a) Spiral CT evaluation of Liver Tumors. In: Fishman EK, Jeffrey R-B (eds) Spiral CT: Principles, Techniques and Clinical Applications. Lippincott-Raven, New York, pp 25–44
Bluemke DA, Soyer PA, Chan BW, et al (1995b) Spiral CT during arterial portography: technique and applications. RadioGraphics 15:623–637
Bluemke DA, Soyer P, Fishman EK (1995c) Nontumorous low-attenuation defects in the liver on helical CT durinf arterial portography: frequency, location, and appearance. AJR 164:1141–1145
Bonaldi VM, Bret PM, Reinhold C, et al (1995) Helical CT of the liver: value of an early hepatic arterial phase. Radiology 197:357–363
Bressler EL, Alpern MB, Glazer GM, et al (1987) Hpervascular hepatic metastases: CT evaluation. Radiology 162:49–51
Ch’en IY, Katz DS, Jeffrey RB, et al (1997) Do arterial phase helical CT images improve detection or characterization of colorectal liver metastases? Comput Assist Tornogr 21(3):391–397
Chezmar JL, Rumancik WM, Megibow AJ, et al (1988) diver and abdominal screening in patients with cancer: CT vs MR imaging. Radiology 168:43–49
Choi BI, Freeny P, Heyano S (1996) High-dose helical CT of the liver with computer automated scan technology: comparison with helical CT arterial portography and conventional helical CT. Radiology 201:145–149
Dodd GD III, Baron RL (1993) Investigation of contrast enhancement in CT of the liver: the need for improved methods. AIR 160:643–646
Fink S, Chaudhuri K (1991) Physiological considerations in imaging liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Am I Physiol Imaging 6:150–160
Foley WD (1989) Dynamic hepatic CT. Radiology 170:617–622
Frederick MG, Paulson EK, Nelson RC (1997) Helical CT for detecting focal liver lesions in patients with breast carcinoma: comparison of noncontrast phase, hepatic arterial phase, and portal venous phase. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21:229–235
Freeny PC (1989) Dynamic hepatic CT. Radiology 170:617–622
Freeny PC (1990) Hepatic CT: techniques, applications and results. In: Ferrucci J, Stark D (eds) Liver imaging: current trends and new techniques. Reading Mass, Andover, pp 28–38
Freeny PC (1997) Helical computed tomography of the liver: techniques, applications and pitfalls. Endoscopy 29:515–523
Freeny PC, Crane R, Feldman R, et al (1990) Preoperative hepatic for lesion detection using bolus-dynamic CT, CT angiography, delayed iodine CT, and MR. Radiology 177:227–232
Heiken J, Weyman P, Lee J, et al (1989) Detection of focal hepatic metastases: prospective evaluation with CT, delayed CT, CT during arterial portography, and MR imaging. Radiology 171:47–51
Hollett MD, Jeffrey RB, Nino-Murcia M, et al (1995) Dualphase helical CT of the liver: value of arterial phase scans in the detection of small (<1.5 cm) malignant hepatic neoplasm. AIR 164:879–884
Honda H, Matsuura Y, Murakami J, et al (1992) Differential Diagnosis of hepatic tumors (hepatoma, hemangioma, and metastasis) with CT: value of two-Phase incremental imaging. AIR 159:735–740
Ikeda A, Freeny P, Ryan J, et al (1996) Preoperative high-dose helical CT of the liver: comparison with surgery, pathology, and intraoperative ultrasound in the detection of hypovascular hepatic neoplasm. Radiology 201:420–426
Irie T, Kusano S (1996) Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of injection time on time to peak hepatic enhancement. Comput Assist Tomogr 20:633–637
Irie T, Takeshita K, Wada Y, et al (1995) CT evaluation of hepatic tumors: comparison of CT with arterial portography, CT with infusion hepatic arteriography, and simultaneous use of both techniques. AIR 164:1407–1411
Kanematsu M, Imaeda T, Hoshi H, et al. (1997) Methodological assessment of combined spiral CT angiography and CT arterial portography. Abdom Imaging 22:404–409
Lencioni R, Pinto F, Armillotta N, et al (1997) Intrahepatic metastatic nodules of hepatocellular carcinoma detected at Lipiodol-CT: imaging-pathologic correlation. Abdom Imaging 22:253–258
Lupetin AR, Cammisa BA, Beckman I, et al (1996) Spiral CT during arterial portography. RadioGraphics 16:723–743
Nelson RC, Chezmar IL, Sugarbaker PH, el al (1989) Hepatic tumors: comparison of CT during arterial portography, delayed CT, and MR imaging for preoperative evaluation. Radiology 172:27–34
Nelson RC, Thompson GH, Chezmar JL, et al (1992) CT during arterial portography: diagnostic pitfalls. RadioGraphics 12:705–718
Ohashi I, Ina H, Gomi N, et al (1995) Hepatic pseudolesion in the left lobe around the falciform ligament at helical CT. Radiology 196:245–249
Oliver JH, Baron RL (1996) Helical biphasic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: technique, indications, interpretation, and pitfalls. Radiology 201:1–14
Oliver JH, Baron RL, Federle MP, Jones BC, Sheng R (1997) Hypervascular liver metastases: do unenhanced and hepatic arterial phase CT images affect tumor detection? Radiology 205:709–715
Olson MC, Posniak HV, Demos TC, et al (1996) Helical computed tomography at 1.5:1 pitch reconstructed at 15 mm and 7 mm intervals for examination of patients with suspected metastatic disease. Can Assoc Radiol J 47:54–58
Paley MR, Ros PR (1997) Hepatic metastases: computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging in 1997. Endoscopy 29:524–538
Patten R, Byun JY, Freeny PC (1993) CT of hypervascular hepatic tumors: are unenhanced scans necessary for diagnosis? AIR 161:979–984
Paulson EK, Baker ME, Hilleren DJ, et al (1992) CT arterial portography: causes of technical failure and variable liver enhancement. AIR 159:745–749
Paulson EK, McDermott VG, Cheogan MT, de Long DM, Frederick MC, Nelson MC (1998) Carcinoid metastases to the liver: role of triple-phase helical CT. Radiology 206:143–150
Perkerson RB Jr, Erwin BC, Baumgartner BR, et al (1985) CT densities in delayed iodine hepatic scanning. Radiology 155:445–449
Platt JF, Francis IR, Ellis JH, et al (1997) Difference in global hepatic enhancement assessed by dynamic CT in normal subjects and patients with hepatic metastases. Comput Assist Tomogr 21:348–354
Reinig JW, Dwyer AJ, Miller DL, et al (1987) Liver metastases detection: comparative sensitivities of MR imaging and CT scanning. Radiology 162:43–47
Silverman PM, Cooper C, Zeman RK (1995a) Imaging of the liver: a survey update of prevailing techniques for conventional CT scanning. Abdom Imaging 20:348–352
Silverman PM, O’Malley J, Tefft MC,et al (1995b) Detection of hepatic metastases by helical CT: effect of different time delays between contrast administration and scanning. AIR 164:619–623
Silverman PM, Roberts S, Tefft MC, et al (1995c) Helical CT of the liver: clinical application of an automated computer technique, smartprep, for obtaining images with optimal contrast enhancement. AJR 165:73–78
Silverman PM, Cooper C, Trock B, et al (1995d) The optimal temporal window for CT of the liver using a time-density analysis: implications for helical (spiral) CT. Comput Assist Tomogr 19:73–79
Silverman PM, Roberts SC, Ducic I, et al (1996) Assessment of a technology that permits individualized scan delays on helical hepatic CT;: a technique to improve efficiency in use of contrast media. AIR 167:79–84
Silverman PM, Kohan L, Ducic I, et al (1998) Imaging of the liver with helical CT;: a survey of scanning techniques. AIR 170:149–152
Small WC, Mehard WB, Langmo LS, et al (1993) Preoperative determination of the resectability of hepatic tumors: efficacy of CT during arterial portography. AJR 161:319–322
Small WC, Nelson RC, Bernardino ME, et al (1994) Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of different amounts and injection rates of contrast media on early contrast enhancement. AIR 163:87–92
Soyer P, Bluemke DA, Hruban RH, Sitzmann JV, Fishman EK (1994) Hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: detec-tion and false-positive findings with helical CT during arterial portography. Radiology 193:71–74
Urban BA, Fishman EK, Kuhlman JE, et al (1993) Detection of focal hepatic lesions with spiral CT: comparison of 4 and 8 mm interscan spacing. AJR 160:783–787
van Leeuwen MS, Noordzij J,Feldberg MAM, et al (1996) Focal liver lesions: characterization with triphasic spiral CT. Radiology 201:327–336
Zeman RK, Silverman PM (1995) Abdomen and Pelvis. In: Pennington J, Ramos Englis M (eds) Helical/Sp,ral CT: a practical approach. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp153–220
Zeman RK, Fox SH, Silverman PM, et al (1993) Helical. (spiral) CT of the abdomen. AIR 160:719–725
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Simonetti, G., Pocek, M., Maspes, F., Squillaci, E., Serafini, G. (1999). Computed Tomography of Liver Metastases. In: Bartolozzi, C., Lencioni, R. (eds) Liver Malignancies. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58641-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58641-5_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63679-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-58641-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive