Skip to main content

Cooperative Procedures for Multiple-Issue Negotiations

  • Conference paper
Operations Research Proceedings 1999

Part of the book series: Operations Research Proceedings 1999 ((ORP,volume 1999))

  • 371 Accesses

Summary

In this paper we demonstrate the design and use of cooperative negotiation procedures by linking cooperative bargaining theory to models of fair division. The main feature of a fair-division approach is that the outcome is determined by a procedure rather than a formula. We generalize two fair-division procedures in order to apply them to multiple-issue, multiple-option negotiations. The procedures consist of two simple and intuitive steps: The first step ensures an efficient outcome, and the second step establishes “fairness” through redistribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 132.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brams, S.J., A.D. Taylor (1996): Fair Division — from cake-cutting to dispute resolution” Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chwolka, A., M.G. Raith (1999): “Group Preference Aggregation with the Analytic Hierarchy Process — Implications for Multiple-issue Agendas,” University of Bielefeld, Department of Economics, DP No. 412.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, R., M.G. Raith (1999): “Strategic Step-by-Step Negotiation,” Journal of Economics, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalai, E., M. Smorodinsky (1975): “Other Solutions to Nash’s Bargaining Problem,” Econometrica, 43, 513–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knaster, B. (1946): “Sur le Problème du Partage Pragmatique de H. Steinhaus,” Annales de la Societé Polonaise de Mathematique, 19, 228–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa, H. (1996): Lectures on Negotiation Analysis, Cambridge, MA: The Program on Negotiation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raith, M.G. (1999a): “Fair-Negotiation Procedures,” Mathematical Social Sciences, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raith, M.G. (1999b): “The Structure of Fair-Division Problems and the Design of Fair-Negotiation Procedures,” in I. Garcia-Jurado, F. Patrone, S. Tijs (eds.): Game Practice, Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raith, M.G., A. Welzel (1998): “Adjusted Winner: An Algorithm for Implementing Bargaining Solutions in Multi-Issue Negotiations,” University of Bielefeld, Institute of Mathematical Economics, WP No. 295.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Raith, M.G. (2000). Cooperative Procedures for Multiple-Issue Negotiations. In: Inderfurth, K., Schwödiauer, G., Domschke, W., Juhnke, F., Kleinschmidt, P., Wäscher, G. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 1999. Operations Research Proceedings 1999, vol 1999. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58300-1_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58300-1_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67094-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-58300-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics