Abstract
This chapter presents some of the components that underlie the topic of this book. I have concentrated my attention on issues such as ideology and science in the planning of education; the ontological status of instructional design; the implications of automation in educational activities; and schools and teachers’ views on instructional design. In the final section, following the main line of argument developed in the chapter, I propose a few interrogations as an invitation to ask more questions and to propose appropriate research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Burner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Bryan, G. L. (1966). Computer-based instruction in the armed forces. In Proceedings of the Engineering Systems for Education and Training Conference. Washington, DC: National Security Industrial Association.
Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines. New York: Teachers College.
Dick, W. (1991). An instructional designer’s view of constructivism. Educational Technology, 31(5), 41–44.
Dreyfus, H. L. (1990). What Computers still can’t do. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Duffy, T. D., & Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology? Educational Technology, May, 7–12.
Edwards, P. N. (1985). Technology of the mind. Santa Cruz, CA: Silicon Valley Research Group.
Gagné, R. M. (1988). Principles of instructional design. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Gleckman, H. (1993). The technological payoff. A sweeping reorganization of work itself is boosting productivity. BusinessWeek, June 14, 36–38 +.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1991). What is a constructivist paradigm. In D. S. Anderson, & B. J. Biddle (Eds.), Knowledge for policy: Improving education through research. New York: The Falmer Press.
Hall, N. (1992). Introduction. In N. Hall (Ed.), The new scientist guide to chaos. New York: Penguin Books.
Knapp, T. J. (1986). The emergence of cognitive psychology in the latter half of the twentieth century. In T. J. Knapp & L. C. Robertson (Eds.), Approaches to cognition: Contrasts and controversies. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Langley, P., Simon, H. A. (1981). The central role of learning in cognition. In T. J. J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mecklenburger, J. A. (1990). Educational technology is not enough. Phi Delta Kappan, October, 105–108.
Ministerio de Education y Ciencia. (1987). Proyecto para la reforma de la enseñanza. Madrid: MEC.
Noble, D. N. (1991). The classroom arsenal: Military research, information technology, and public education. New York: The Falmer Press.
Olsen, J. R., & Bas, V. B. (1982). The application of performance technology in the military: 1960–1980. NSPI Journal (July-August), 32–36.
Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.) (1983). Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Resnick, L. (1983). Toward a cognitive theory of instruction. In S. G. Paris (Ed.), Learning and motivation in the classroom. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rigney, J. V., & Munro, A. (1981). Learning strategies. In H. F. O’Neil,Jr. (Ed.), Computer-based instruction. A state-of-the-art-assessment. New York: Academic Press.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1984). Planning problems are wicked problems. In Gross, N. (Ed.), Developments in design methodology. New York: Wiley & Sons.
Sancho, J. M. (1990). Los profesores y el curriculum. Barcelona: Horsori.
Sancho, J. M. (1994). Issues concerning the development and application of educational software. In R. D. Tennyson (Ed.), Automating instructional design, development, and delivery. NATO ASI Series F, Vol. 119. Berlin: Springer.
Schon, D. (1992). The theory of inquiry: Dewey’s legacy to education. Curriculum Inquiry, 22(2), 119–139.
Searle, J. R. (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Simon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.
Simon, H. A. (1983). Why should machines learn? In R. S. Michalski (Ed.), Machine learning and artificial intelligence. Palo Alto, CA.: Tioga.
Tanner, D., & Tanner, L. N. (1980). Curriculum development. New York: Macmillan.
Taylor, F. V. (1957). Psychology and design of machines. American Psychologist, 12, 141–148.
van Creveld, M. (1985). Command in war. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer power and human reason: From judgment to calculation. New York: Freeman.
Young, M. F. D. (1971). Knowledge and control. London: Collier MacMillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gil, J.M.S. (1995). Looking for the “Right” Answers or Raising the “Right” Questions? A Dialogical Approach to Automating Instructional Design. In: Tennyson, R.D., Barron, A.E. (eds) Automating Instructional Design: Computer-Based Development and Delivery Tools. NATO ASI Series, vol 140. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57821-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57821-2_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63366-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57821-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive