Abstract
H. Anger proposed the use of gamma camera detectors based on sodium iodide to register positron annihilation quanta as early as 1963. However, it took a relatively long time, until the year 1995, to develop tomographic imaging systems which were suited for routine applications [1]. In the few years since then, the performance of these systems has significantly risen, and their development has been predominantly aimed at improving the imaging quality of this PET variant. As a matter of fact, PET with gamma camera coincidence systems has now reached a level of performance which was hardly imaginable even a few years ago. The current imaging quality far surpasses that of the early dedicated PET scanners. This progress was made possible by advances in the design of digital gamma camera detectors as well as the availability of highly effective and fast signal processors. The performance of computers suited for complex tomographic reconstruction techniques has also risen considerably. When the first gamma camera coincidence systems for routine applications were introduced onto the market, it was apparent that the starting points of the manufacturers of such cameras were very different. Some of them focused their efforts on crystal thickness, others on signal processing or the application of transaxial septa. But these differing approaches were soon converging, optimizing tomographic resolution and providing easy system handling. Since the systems have become more alike, their imaging properties and clinical results are comparable.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anger H (1963) Gamma-ray and positron scintillation camera. Nucleonics 21:1056
Bahre M, Meller B, Lauer I, Luig H, Richter E (1998) PET with a gamma camera coincidence system: phantom studies and first clinical results. J Nucl Med 39:108P (abstr)
Bähre M, Dormeier A, Meller B, Lauer I, Haase A, Richter E (1999) Diagnostic efficacy of gamma camera coincidence PET in breast cancer. J Nucl Med 40:134P (abstr)
Delbeke D, Sandler MP, Al-Sugair A, Martin WH, Coleman RE (1998) Comparison of dedicated and camera-based PET imaging of FDG in patients with focal pulmonary lesions. J Nucl Med 39:108P (abstr)
Kunze WD, Baehre M, Richter E (2000) PET with a dual-head coincidence camera: spatial resolution, scatter fraction and sensitivity. J Nucl Med 41 (in press)
Luig H, Eschner W, Bahre M, Voth E, Nolte G (1988) An iterative strategy for determination of the source distribution in Single-Photon Emission Tomography with a rotating gamma camera. Nucl Med 27:140–146
Schwaiger M, Ziegler S (1997) PET mit Koinzidenzkamera versus Ringtomograph, Fortschritt oder Rückschritt? Nuklearmedizin 36:3–5
Segall GM, Carlisle M, Bocher M (1999) Prospective comparison of coincidence imaging versus dedicated PET in patients with cancer. J Nucl Med 40:135P (abstr)
Shreve P, Steventon RS, Deters E, Gross MD, Wahl RL (1998) Lesion detection in oncologic diagnosis: comparison of dual head coincidence with dedicated PET FDG imaging. J Nucl Med 39:109P (abstr)
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bähre, M. (2000). Optimization of gamma camera coincidence systems for PET in oncology. In: Wieler, H.J., Coleman, R.E. (eds) PET in Clinical Oncology. Steinkopff, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57703-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57703-1_9
Publisher Name: Steinkopff, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63329-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57703-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive