Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Endoskopische versus konventionelle Kolposuspension

  • Chapter
Gynäkologische Endoskopie pro und contra

  • 32 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Stressharninkontinenz ist in der überwiegenden Zahl der Fälle durch Veränderungen der Halte- und Stützstrukturen um Blasenhals und Urethra verursacht. Klinisches Kennzeichen dieser Art von Inkontinenz ist die Hypermobilität der entsprechenden anatomischen Strukturen. Bei plözlichen intraabdominellen Drucksteigerungen übersteigt der Blasen-druck den Harnrörendruck und es kommt zum unwillkürlichen Ab-gang von Urin. Der Urethralverschlussdruck in Ruhe (UVD max.) liegt bei diesen Patientinnen im Normbereich. Bei einer wesentlich kleineren Gruppe von Patientinnen ist primär der Verschlussmechanismus der Harnröhre gestört. Ursachlich sind Denervierung, Fibrosierung und Atrophisierung der Harnröhrenmuskulatur. Der Urethralverschlussdruck in Ruhe ist bei diesen Patientinnen deutlich niedriger als bei altersent-sprechenden gesunden Frauen (<20cm H2O). Die sogenannte funktio-nelle Urethralänge ist meist verkürzt. Die proximale Urethra ist auch in Ruhe trichterformig zur Blase hin geöffnet. Im Gegensatz zur ersten Gruppe kann bei der seltenen „reinen“ Form einer hypotonen Urethra der Blasenhals funktionell anatomisch stabil sein. Mischformen sind je-doch häufig.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Alcalay M, Monga A, Stanton SL (1995) Burch colposuspension: a 10–20 year follow up. Br J Obstet Gynaec 102:740–745

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergman A, Ballard Da, Konnings PP (1989) Comparison of three different surgical procedures for genuine stress incontinence: Prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 16:1102–1106

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bergman A, Elia G (1995) Three surgical procedures for genuine stress incontinence: Five year follow up of a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:66–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Buller JL, Cundiff GW (2000) Laparoscopic surgeries for urinary incontinence. Clin Obstet Gynecol 43:604–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Burch JC (1961) Urethrovaginal fixation to Cooper’s ligament for the correction of stress incontinence, cystocele and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 88:281–290

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burch JC (1968) Cooper’s ligament urethrovesical suspension for stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 100:764–772

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Burton G (1993) A randomized comparison of laparoscopic and open colposuspension. Neurourol Urodyn 13:497–498

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burton G (1997) A three year prospective randomized urodynamic study comparing open and laparoscopic colposuspension. Neurol Urodyn 16:353–354

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cowan W, Morgan HR (1979) A simplified retropubic urethropexy in the treatment of primary and recurrent urinary stress incontinence in the female. Am J Obstet gynecol 134:295–298

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cutner A, Smith ARB (2001) Laparoscopic colposuspension. Current Opinion Obstet Gynec 13:533–537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Das S (1999) Laparoscopic surgery for female urinary incontinence: prudence shall prevail. JSLS 3:273–277

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Demirci F, Petri E (2000) Perioperative complications of Burch colposuspension. Int Urogynecol J 11:170–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Drouin J, Tessier J, Bertrand PE, Schick E (1999) Burch colposuspension: Long-term results and review of published reports. Urology 54:808–814

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Eberhard J (1988) Die Integration der Urodynamik im Diagnostik-und Therapie-konzept der Stressinkontinenz der Frau. Habilitationsschrift, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fatthy H, El lHao M, Samaha I, Abdallah K (2001) Modified Burch colposuspension: laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 8:99–106

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gunn GC, Cooper RP, Gordon NS, Gragnon L (1994) Use of a new device for endoscopic suturing in the laparoscopic Burch procedure. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2:65–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ingelman-Sundberg A (1951) Urinary incontinence in women excluding fistulas. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 31:266–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jarvis G (1994) Surgery for genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obst et Gynaec 101

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lam AM, Jenkins GJ, Hyslop RS (1995) Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for stress incontinence: preliminary results. Med J Aust 162:18–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Langebrekke A, Dahistrom B, Eraker R, Urnes A (1995) The laparoscopic Burch procedure: a preliminary report. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 74:153–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lavin JM, Lewis GJ, Foote AJ et al (1998) Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension: A minimum of 2 years follow up and comparison with open colposuspension. Gynaecol Endosc 7:251–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee C, Yen C, Wang C et al (1998) Extraperitoneoscopic colposuspension using CO2 distension method. Int Surg 83:262–264

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu C, Paek W (1993) Laparoscopic retropubic colposuspension (Burch procedure). J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1:31–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu C (1994) Laparoscopic treatment of genuine urinary stress incontinence. Clin Obstet Gynecol 8:789–798

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mashall VF, Marchetti AA, Krantz KE (1949) The correction of stress incontinence by simple vesicourethral suspension. Surg Gynecol Obstet 88:509–516

    Google Scholar 

  26. Me Dougall EM (2001) Laparoscopic management of female urinary incontinence Urol Clin North Am 28:145–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Meeks GR (2000) Advanced laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Surg Clin North Am 80:1443–1464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Miklos JR, Kohli N (2000) Laparoscopic paravaginal repair plus burch colposuspension: review and descriptive technique. Urology 56(Suppl6a):64–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nezhat CH, Nezhat F, Netzhat CR et al (1994) Laparoscopic retropubic cystocolpo-suspension, J Am Assoc Gynecol laparosc 1:339–349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Persson J, Wolner-Hanssen P (2000) Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence: a randomized comparison of one or two sutures on each side of the urethra. Obstet Gynecol 95:151–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Polascik TJ, Moore RG, Rosenberg MT et al (1995) Comparison of laparoscopic and open retropubic urethropexy for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Urology 45:647–652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Raz S (1981) Modified bladder neck suspension for female stress incontinence. Urology 17:82–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Richardson DA (1991) The evaluation of different surgical procedures. In Oster-gard DR, Blut E: Urogynecology and Urodynamics. Theory and Practice. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ross JW (1995) Laparoscopic Burch repair compared to laparotomy Burch for cure of urinary stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol 6:323–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ross JW (1996) Two techniques of laparoscopic Burch repair for stress incontinence — a prospective randomized study. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 3:351–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Saidi MH, Gallagker MS, Skop IP et al (1998) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic colpo-suspension: Short term cure rates, complications and duration of hospital stay in comparison with Burch colposuspension. Obstet Gynecol 92:619–621

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Speights SE, Moore RD, Miklos JR (2000) Frequency of lower urinary tract injury at laparoscopic Burch and paravaginal repair. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 7:515–518

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Stanton SL, Cardozo LD (1979) Results of the colposuspension operation for incontinence and prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaec 86:L693–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Stanton SL (1990) Surgical management of urethral sphincter incompetence. Clin Obstet Gynecol 33:346–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Su TH, Wang KG, Hsu CY et al (1997) Prospective comparison of laparoscopic and traditional colposuspension in the treatment of genuine stress incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 76:576–582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Schmidt EH, De Wilde RL (1998) Standardverfahren der minimalinvasiven Chi-rurgie in der Frauenheilkunde. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tanagho EA (1976) Colpocystourethropexy: the way we do it. J Urol 116:751–753

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Vancaillie TG, Schiissler W (1991) Laparoscopic bladder-neck suspension. J Lapar-oendosc Surg 1:169–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. E. H. Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. Frank
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. L. DeWilde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Frauenklinik der Medizinischen Fakultät, RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen

    Eduard Malik

  2. Medizinische Universität zu Lübeck, Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck

    Klaus Diedrich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schmidt, E.H., Frank, V., DeWilde, R.L. (2002). Endoskopische versus konventionelle Kolposuspension. In: Malik, E., Diedrich, K. (eds) Gynäkologische Endoskopie pro und contra. Steinkopff, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57440-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57440-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63264-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57440-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation