Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Komplikationen nach laparoskopischen und offen-chirurgischen Eingriffen in der Gynäkologie

  • Chapter
Gynäkologische Endoskopie pro und contra

  • 33 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die zunehmende Verbreitung der endoskopischen Techniken ist vielfach begleitet von dem Glauben, dass diese Verfahren einfach und ohne Risi-ken sind. Der Begriff „minimalinvasive Chirurgie“ führt zur Unterschät-zung der Möglichkeit der Komplikationen. „Minimalinvasiv“ ist nur der Zugangsweg, der eigentliche chirurgische Operationsvorgang entspricht dem der offenen Chirurgie. Daher beinhaltet diese Therapieform, wie je-de chirurgische Intervention auch, eine Vielzahl von möglichen Komplikationen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Bayer SR (1993) Trocar injuries to the large intestine. In: Corfman RS, Diamond MP, De Cherney AH (eds) Complications of laparoscopy and hysteroscopy. Black-well Scientific Publications, Boston, pp 46–49

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boike GM, Elfstrand EP, DelPriore G, Schumock D, Holley HS, Lurain JR (1993) Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital: Report of 82 cases and comparison with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168:1690–1701

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Canis M, Botchorishvili R, Manhes H, Wattiez A, Mage G, Pouly JL, Bruhat MA (2000) Management of adnexal masses: role and risk of laparoscopy. Seminars in Surgical Oncology 19:28–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chan YGS, Ho HK, Chen CYH (1993) Abdominal hysterectomy: Indications and complications. Singapore Med J 34:337–340

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chapron CM, Dubuisson J-B, Ansquer Y (1996) Is total hysterectomy a safe surgical procedure? Human Reproduction 1(11):2422–2424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chapron C, Devroey P, Dubuisson JB, Pouly JL, Vercellini P (1997) ESHRE guidelines for training, accreditation and monitoring in gynaecological endoscopy. Human Reproduction 1(4):867–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chapron C, Querleu D, Bruhat M-A, Madelenat P, Fernandez H, Pierre F, Dubuisson J-B (1998) Surgical complications of diagnostic and operative gynaecological laparoscopy: a series of 29966 cases. Human Reproduction 13:867–872

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dicker RC, Greenspan JR, Strauss LT, Cowart MR, Scally MJ, Peterson HB, De Ste-fano F, Rubin GL, Ory HW (1982) Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. The Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 144:841–848

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Foong C, Connell R, Gangar K, Bridgwood P, Wright J (1995) A comparison of la-paroscopic versus conventional surgery in the management of ectopic pregnancy. Gynaecological Endoscopy 4:21–24

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gal D, Lind L, Lovecchio JL, Kohn N (1995) Comparitive study of laparoscopy vs. laparotomy for adnexal surgery: efficacy, safety and cyst rupture. J Gynecol Surgery 11(3):153–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Garry R (1995) How safe is the laparoscopic approach to hysterectomy? Gynecological Endoscopy 4:77–79

    Google Scholar 

  12. Härkki-Sirén P, Kurki T (1997) A nationwide analysis of laparoscopic complications. Obstet Gynecol 89:108–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Härkki-Sirén P, Sjöberg J, Mäkinen J, Heinonen PK, Kauko M, Tomás E, Laatikai-nen T (1997) Finnish national register of laparoscopic hysterectomies: A review and complications of 1165 operations. J Obstet Gynecol 176:118–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hidlebaugh DA, Vulgaropulos S, Orr RK (1997) Treating adnexal masses. J Reprod Med 42:551–558

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hill DJ, Maher PJ, Wood CE, Lolatgis N, Lawrence A, Dowling B, Lawrence M (1994) Complications of laparoscopic hysterectomy. The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 1:159–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hulka J, Peterson HB, Phillips JM, Surrey MW (1995) Operative Laparoscopy: American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists’ 1993 Membership Survey. The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 2:133–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hulka JF, Levy BS, Parker WH, Phillips JM (1997) Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists’ 1995 Membership Survey. The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (2):167–171

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hutchins FL (1995) Abdominal myomectomy as a treatment for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 2(4):781–789

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jansen FW, Kapiteyn K, Trimbos-Kemper T, Hermans J, Baptist Trimbos J (1997) Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:595–600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lamorte A, Lalwani S, Diamond M (1993) Morbidity associated with abdominal myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol 82:897–900

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lehmann-Willenbrock E, Riedel H-H, Mecke H, Semm K (1992) Pelviscopy/la-paroscopy and its complications in Germany, 1949-1988. J Reprod Med 37:671–677

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Levy BS (1993) Perforations of the large vascular structures. In: Corfman RS, Diamond MP, DeCherney AH (eds) Complications of laparoscopy and hysteroscopy. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston, pp 33–37

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lundorff P (1997) Laparoscopic surgery in ectopic pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 164:81–84

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Meikle SF, Nugent EW, Orleans M (1997) Complications and recovery from la-paroscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 8:304–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Miller CE (2000) Myomectomy. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 2(2):407–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nezhat C, Nezhat F, Silfen S, Schaffer N, Evans D (1991) Laparoscopic myomectomy. Int J Fertil 35:275–280

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nezhat FR, Roemisch M, Nezhat CH, Seidman DS, Nezhat CR (1998) Recurrence rate after laparoscopic myomectomy. The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (3):237–240

    Google Scholar 

  28. Papasakelariou C, Saunders D, De La Rosa A (1995) Comparitive study of laparoscopic oophorectomy. The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 2(4):407–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Parker WH (1995) Myomectomy: laparoscopy or laparotomy? Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 3(2):392–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Reich H, De Caprio J, Me Glynn F (1989) Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surgery 5:213–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Saidi MH, Vancaillie TG, White AJ, Sadler RK, Akright BD, Farhart SA (1996) Complications of major operative laparoscopy. A review of 452 cases. J Reprod Med 41:471–476

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Saville LE, Woods MS (1995) Laparoscopy and major retroperitoneal vascular injuries (MRVI). Surgical Endoscopy 9:1096–1100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Schmidt EH, Wischnewski M (1995) Quality assurance by documentation programs of the Endoscopic Projekt group. Zentralbl Gynäkol 11(12):678–679

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schmidt EH, De Wilde RL (1998) Standardverfahren der minimal-invasiven Chi-rurgie in der Frauenheilkunde: Operationsatlas der Laparoskopie. Thieme, Stuttgart, New York, S 33–38

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schmidt EH, Frank V, Schwedes K, DeWilde RL, Wischnewski M (2000) Kompli-kationserfassung gynäkologische Endoskopie: Ein Projekt der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Endoskopie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Ge-burtshilfe. In: Bender HG, Schwenzer T, Weyergraf H-J, Wallwiener D (Hrsg) Operative Gynäkologie. Thieme, Stuttgart, New York, S 157–170

    Google Scholar 

  36. Smith S (1992) Complications of laparoscopic and hysteroscopic surgery. In: Azziz R, Murphy AA (eds) Practical manual of laparoscopy and hysteroscopy. Springer, New York, pp 199–211

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Sultana CJ, Sogor L (1996) Laparoscopy vs laparotomy for gynecologic procedures. J Reprod Med 41:225–230

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Summitt RL, Stovall TG, Lipscomb GH, Ling FW (1992) Randomized comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with standard vaginal hysterectomy in an outpatient setting. Obstet Gynecol 80:895–901

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tripoulas J, Grifo JA (1993) Trocar injuries to the stomach. In: Corfman RS, Diamond MP, De Cherney AH (eds) Complications of laparoscopy and hysteroscopy. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston, pp 60–63

    Google Scholar 

  40. Vermesh M, Silva PD, Rosen GF, Stein AL, Fossum GT, Sauer MV (1989) Management of unruptured ectopic gestation by linear salpingotomy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy. Obstet Gynecol 7(2):282–283

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. V. Frank
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. H. Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. L. DeWilde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Frauenklinik der Medizinischen Fakultät, RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen

    Eduard Malik

  2. Medizinische Universität zu Lübeck, Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck

    Klaus Diedrich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Frank, V., Schmidt, E.H., DeWilde, R.L. (2002). Komplikationen nach laparoskopischen und offen-chirurgischen Eingriffen in der Gynäkologie. In: Malik, E., Diedrich, K. (eds) Gynäkologische Endoskopie pro und contra. Steinkopff, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57440-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57440-5_10

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63264-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57440-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation