Skip to main content

Validation of MRI/SPECT similarity-based registration methods using realistic simulations of normal and pathological SPECT data

  • Conference paper
CARS 2002 Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

Abstract

We propose a validation methodology to study the behaviour of SPECT/MRI similarity-based registration methods in normal and pathological conditions. Validation data sets were computed by simulating realistic SPECT data from 3D Tl-weighted MRI data, through Monte Carlo simulations, using a perfusion model built from measurements made on real SPECT data (normal or pathological). Validation of four similarity-based registration methods performed on these simulated data showed a registration mean accuracy significantly lower than simulated SPECT spatial resolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnden L., Kwiatek R., Lau Y. et al., “Validation of fully automatic brain SPET to MR co-registration”, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 27(2), 147–154, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pfluger T., Vollmar C., Wismüller A. et al., “Quantitative comparison of automatic and interactive methods for MRI-SPECT image registration of the brain based on 3-dimensional calculation of error”, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 41(11), 1823–1829, 2000.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. West J., Fitzpatrick J. M., Wang M. Y. et al., “Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality brain image registration techniques”, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 21(4), 554–566, 1997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Woods R. P., Mazziotta J. C., and Cherry S. R., “MRI-PET registration with automated algorithm”, Journal of Computed Assisted Tomography, 17(4), 536–546, 1993.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wells III W.M., Viola P., Atsumi H. et al., “Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of Mutual Information”, Medical Image Analysis, 1(1), 35–51, 1996.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maes F., Collignon A., Vandermeulen D. et al., “Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information”, IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, 16(2), 187–198, 1997.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Studholme C., Hill D.L.G., and Hawkes D.J., “An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment”, Pattern Recognition, 32, 71–86, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Roche A., Malandain G., Pennec X. et al., “The correlation ratio as a new similarity measure for multimodal image registration”, MICCAI’98: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Wells W.M., Colchester A. and Delp S., 1496, 1115–1124, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zubal I.G., Harrell C.R., Smith E.O. et al., “Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy”, Medical Physics, 21(2), 299–302, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Friston K.J., Ashburner J., Poline J.B. et al., “Spatial registration and normalization of images”, Human Brain Mapping, 2, 165–189, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Harrison R.L., Vannoy S.D., Haynor D.R. et al., “Preliminary experience with the photon history generator module of a public-domain simulation system for emission tomography”. Conf. Rec. Nucl. Sci. Symp., 2, 115 4–1158, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Grova, C. et al. (2002). Validation of MRI/SPECT similarity-based registration methods using realistic simulations of normal and pathological SPECT data. In: Lemke, H.U., Inamura, K., Doi, K., Vannier, M.W., Farman, A.G., Reiber, J.H.C. (eds) CARS 2002 Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56168-9_75

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56168-9_75

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-62844-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56168-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics