Abstract
GMOs have had a bad run in the popular media lately. The persistently negative portrayals are unfortunate for many reasons, but most notably because the transgenic technology has the potential to accomplish a number of critical humanitarian and environmental objectives, often ones espoused by those who oppose GMOs. This essay explores the deeper nature of the popular media’s and general public’s failure to grasp and present the benefits of GMOs with scientific accuracy and a sense of objectivity that both the media and public claim to seek. Building on this analysis, it then examines the matter of how corporations and scientists might better convey their message, exploring the potential of third-party verifiers and labeling initiatives to alleviate much of the public’s mistrust of transgenic technology. In the end, there is substantial evidence that the “problem” with GMOs does not inhere in the medium but the message.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Academics Review (2010) Jeffery Smith: False claims unsupported by science. http://academicsreview.org/2010/02/jeffrey-smith-false-claims-unsupported-by-science/
Brainard C (2008) “Can GM crops solve the food crisis: UCS says journalists overstate potential for higher yields.” Columbia J Rev July 21, 2008: http://www.cjr.org/the_observatory/can_gm_crops_solve
Cook G (2006) ’Words of mass destruction’: British newspaper coverage of the genetically modified food debate, expert and non-expert reactions. Publ Understand Sci 15(5):5–29
Degnan FH (2000) Biotechnology and the food label: a legal perspective. Food Drug Law J 55(3):301–310
Fedoroff N (1999) Mendel in the kitchen: a scientist’s view of genetically modified foods. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC
Friedman S (2009) Fresh: a perishable history. Harvard University Press, Boston, MA
McWilliams JE (2009) Just food: where Locavores get it wrong and how we can truly eat responsibly. Little Brown, New York, NY
Miller M (2004) Americans’ opinions about genetically modified foods remain divided, but majority want a strong regulatory system. In Pew Charitable Trusts. http://www.pewtrusts.org/news_room-detail.aspx?id=17962
Mnookin S (2010) The panic virus: a true story of medicine, science, and fear. Simon and Schuster, New York, NY
Mooney C (2009) Unscientific America: how scientific illiteracy threatenes our future. Basic Books, New York, NY
Munro WA, Shurman RA (2008) Sustaining outrage: cultural capital, strategic location, and motivating sensibilities in the U.S. Anti-genetic engineering movement. In: Wright W, Middendorf G (eds) The fight over food: producers, consumers, and activists challenge the global food system. Penn State Press, State College, PA
Pollan M (2008) In defense of food: an eater’s Manifesto. Penguin Press, New York, NY
Poortinga W, Pidgeon N (2007) Public perceptions of agricultural biotechnology in the UK: the case of genetically modified food. In: Brossard D, Shanahan J, Nesbitt TC (eds) The media, the public, and agricultural biotechnology. CAB International, Wallingford
Pornpitakpan C (2004) The persuasiveness of source credibility: a critical review of five decades’ evidence. J Appl Soc Psych 34:243–281
Roe B, Tiesl MF (2007) Genetically modified food labeling: the impacts of message and messenger on consumer perceptions of labels and products. Food Policy 32:49–66
Ronald P, Adamchak R (2008) Tomorrow’s table: organic farming, genetics, and the future of food. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Rousu M, Huffman WE, Shogren JF, Tegene A (2007) Effects and value of verifiable information in a controversial market: evidence from lab auctions of genetically modified food. Econ Inq 45(3):409–432
Specter M (2009) Denialism: how irrational thinking hinders scientific progress, harms the planet, and threatens our lives. Penguin, New York, NY
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McWilliams, J.E. (2014). Turning the GM Battleship: The Tide of Popular Opinion and the Future of Genetically Modified Foods. In: Songstad, D., Hatfield, J., Tomes, D. (eds) Convergence of Food Security, Energy Security and Sustainable Agriculture. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, vol 67. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55262-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55262-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55261-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55262-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)