Skip to main content

Surface-Treated Two-Component C-Implant: Revisited

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices

Abstract

C-implant is a two-component orthodontic mini-implant with 1.8 mm diameter and 8.5 mm length. It is surface treated with sandblasting and acid etching to reduce implant failure. The head portion of the C-implant is detachable and functions as a buccal tube of a fixed appliance to allow archwire to pass through the hole in the head portion. Osseointegration of C-implants widened the clinical treatment modality by allowing multidirectional orthodontic force applications for intended orthodontic tooth movement. Rotation resistance increased the efficiency and efficacy of force control during orthodontic treatment. C-implant is especially useful for Biocreative Orthodontics, defined as independent en masse retraction of the anterior teeth while avoiding orthodontic appliances on the posterior segments during the retraction period. This alternative approach is beneficial in maximum anchorage cases that present with a poor dental health status such as severe dental caries, advanced periodontal disease, or missing posterior teeth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    C-palatal plate: Alternative treatment of choice instead of miniscrews for guarded periodontal health patients. Push and pull mechanics are possible.

References

  1. Lee S, Chung K. The effect of early loading on the direct bone-to-implant surface contact of the orthodontic osseointegrated titanium implant. Korean J Orthod. 2001;31:173–85.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chung K-R, Kim S-H, Kook Y-A. The C-orthodontic micro-implant. J Clin Orthod. 2004;38(9):478–86, quiz 487–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chung K-R, Nelson G, Kim S-H, Kook Y-A. Severe bidentoalveolar protrusion treated with orthodontic microimplant-dependent en-masse retraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132(1):105–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim S-H, Lee S-J, Cho I-S, Kim S-K, Kim T-W. Rotational resistance of surface-treated mini-implants. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(5):899–907.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim S-H, Cho J-H, Chung K-R, Kook Y-A, Nelson G. Removal torque values of surface-treated mini-implants after loading. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134(1):36–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim S-H, Choi J-H, Chung K-R, Nelson G. Do sand blasted with large grit and acid etched surface treated mini-implants remain stationary under orthodontic forces? Angle Orthod. 2012;82(2):304–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee S-J, Lin L, Kim S-H, Chung K-R, Donatelli RE. Survival analysis of a miniplate and tube device designed to provide skeletal anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;144(3):349–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kang S-M. Cryo-Transmission electron microscopy evaluation of interface of orthodontic implant surface and cortical bone in human patients [PhD thesis]. Seoul: Kyung Hee University; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bills DA, Handelman CS, BeGole EA. Bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: traits and orthodontic correction. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(3):333–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chung K-R, Kook Y-A, Kim S-H, Mo S-S, Jung J-A. Class II malocclusion treated by combining a lingual retractor and a palatal plate. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133(1):112–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim S-H, Hwang Y-S, Ferreira A, Chung K-R. Analysis of temporary skeletal anchorage devices used for en-masse retraction: a preliminary study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(2):268–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Dr. Kyung Won Seo, postgraduate student of Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry, for manuscript editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seong-Hun Kim DDS, MSD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chung, KR., Kim, Y., Kim, SH. (2014). Surface-Treated Two-Component C-Implant: Revisited. In: Kim, K. (eds) Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55052-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55052-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55051-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55052-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics