Abstract
C-implant is a two-component orthodontic mini-implant with 1.8 mm diameter and 8.5 mm length. It is surface treated with sandblasting and acid etching to reduce implant failure. The head portion of the C-implant is detachable and functions as a buccal tube of a fixed appliance to allow archwire to pass through the hole in the head portion. Osseointegration of C-implants widened the clinical treatment modality by allowing multidirectional orthodontic force applications for intended orthodontic tooth movement. Rotation resistance increased the efficiency and efficacy of force control during orthodontic treatment. C-implant is especially useful for Biocreative Orthodontics, defined as independent en masse retraction of the anterior teeth while avoiding orthodontic appliances on the posterior segments during the retraction period. This alternative approach is beneficial in maximum anchorage cases that present with a poor dental health status such as severe dental caries, advanced periodontal disease, or missing posterior teeth.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
C-palatal plate: Alternative treatment of choice instead of miniscrews for guarded periodontal health patients. Push and pull mechanics are possible.
References
Lee S, Chung K. The effect of early loading on the direct bone-to-implant surface contact of the orthodontic osseointegrated titanium implant. Korean J Orthod. 2001;31:173–85.
Chung K-R, Kim S-H, Kook Y-A. The C-orthodontic micro-implant. J Clin Orthod. 2004;38(9):478–86, quiz 487–8.
Chung K-R, Nelson G, Kim S-H, Kook Y-A. Severe bidentoalveolar protrusion treated with orthodontic microimplant-dependent en-masse retraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132(1):105–15.
Kim S-H, Lee S-J, Cho I-S, Kim S-K, Kim T-W. Rotational resistance of surface-treated mini-implants. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(5):899–907.
Kim S-H, Cho J-H, Chung K-R, Kook Y-A, Nelson G. Removal torque values of surface-treated mini-implants after loading. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134(1):36–43.
Kim S-H, Choi J-H, Chung K-R, Nelson G. Do sand blasted with large grit and acid etched surface treated mini-implants remain stationary under orthodontic forces? Angle Orthod. 2012;82(2):304–12.
Lee S-J, Lin L, Kim S-H, Chung K-R, Donatelli RE. Survival analysis of a miniplate and tube device designed to provide skeletal anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;144(3):349–56.
Kang S-M. Cryo-Transmission electron microscopy evaluation of interface of orthodontic implant surface and cortical bone in human patients [PhD thesis]. Seoul: Kyung Hee University; 2013.
Bills DA, Handelman CS, BeGole EA. Bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: traits and orthodontic correction. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(3):333–9.
Chung K-R, Kook Y-A, Kim S-H, Mo S-S, Jung J-A. Class II malocclusion treated by combining a lingual retractor and a palatal plate. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133(1):112–23.
Kim S-H, Hwang Y-S, Ferreira A, Chung K-R. Analysis of temporary skeletal anchorage devices used for en-masse retraction: a preliminary study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(2):268–76.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Dr. Kyung Won Seo, postgraduate student of Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry, for manuscript editing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chung, KR., Kim, Y., Kim, SH. (2014). Surface-Treated Two-Component C-Implant: Revisited. In: Kim, K. (eds) Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55052-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55052-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55051-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55052-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)