Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Management and Coordination of Free/Open Source Projects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Software Project Management in a Changing World

Abstract

Developing software in the free/open source software (F/OSS) way is fundamentally different from the conventional, closed, team-based, single-owner software project. As a consequence, managing a F/OSS project is done in a quite different way, emphasizing on people and community coordination and organization. Management organization may take extremely distant forms: absolute monarchies, oligarchies, or open source democracies, with community members voting to decide project evolution. On the other hand, not all F/OSS projects are based on pure voluntarism. Many such projects are sponsored by firms and are managed in their own way. In addition, certain extreme project transformations, such as forking, occur frequently in F/OSS. Human resource management (e.g., team building) and decision making (e.g., project cancellation) are also done in a completely different way. This chapter focuses on how human resource management and project organization are handled in F/OSS today. On the other hand, there are several areas in which, given enough research and experimentation, new tools may be provided to assist informed, successful F/OSS management, aiming to help both experienced and novice F/OSS coordinators. The chapter attempts to foresee how measurement, simulation, and antipattern techniques might help F/OSS managers in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.fsf.org/.

  2. 2.

    http://opensource.org/.

  3. 3.

    http://sourceforge.net/.

  4. 4.

    https://github.com/.

  5. 5.

    http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/What%20is%20SourceForge.net.

  6. 6.

    http://joinup.ec.europa.eu/, EU open source reuse repository for public administrations.

  7. 7.

    http://brlcad.org/, advertised by U.S. Army as the world’s oldest open source software.

  8. 8.

    http://www.freebsd.org/.

  9. 9.

    Male managers in FLOSS are an order of a magnitude more common, thus we use from now on.

  10. 10.

    This is evident if we look at many widely known traditional process models, such as the Rational Unified Process or Boehm’s spiral model.

  11. 11.

    LifeRay Inc. chooses what features proposed by the community to develop, but encourages developers to do the same see http://www.liferay.com/community/ideas.

  12. 12.

    http://www.agilemanifesto.org/.

  13. 13.

    https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/.

  14. 14.

    http://www.debian.org/vote/.

  15. 15.

    http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#meritocracy.

  16. 16.

    http://incubator.apache.org/.

  17. 17.

    http://www.openoffice.org/.

  18. 18.

    http://community.apache.org/mentoringprogramme.html.

  19. 19.

    http://www.freebsd.org/projects/summerofcode.html.

  20. 20.

    http://www.ubuntu.com/.

  21. 21.

    http://plone.org/.

  22. 22.

    http://www.zope.org/.

  23. 23.

    http://www.spinellis.gr/cscout/.

  24. 24.

    http://java.uom.gr/~jdeodorant/.

  25. 25.

    http://commons.apache.org/.

  26. 26.

    http://ftacademy.org/.

References

  • Abdel-Hamid T, Madnick S (1991) Software project dynamics: an integrated approach. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Aberdour M (2007) Achieving quality in open source software. IEEE Softw 24(1):58–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Advani D, Hassoun Y, Counsell S (2005) Refactoring trends across N versions of N Java open source systems: an empirical study. Technical report, University of London

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoniades I, Stamelos I, Angelis L, Bleris G (2002) A novel simulation model for the development process of open source software projects. Softw Process Improv Pract 7(3–4):173–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspeli M (2005) A model of a mature open source project. MSc Thesis, London School of Economics

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck K (1999) Extreme programming explained: embrace change. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown W, Malveau R, McCormick H, Thomas S, Hudson T (eds) (2000) Anti-patterns in project management. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra E, Francalanci C, Merlo F, Rossi-Lamastra C (2011) Firms’ involvement in open source projects: a trade-off between software structural quality and popularity. J Syst Softw 84(1):144–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerone A, Settas D (2011) Using antipatterns to improve the quality of FLOSS development. Fifth international workshop on foundations and techniques for open source software certification

    Google Scholar 

  • Coverity (2013) 2012 coverity scan report. Available from http://softwareintegrity.coverity.com/. Released 7 May 2013

  • Crowston K, Howison J, Annabi H (2006) Information systems success in free and open source software development: theory and measures. Softw Process Improv Pract 11(2):123–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evangelopoulos N, Sidorova A, Fotopoulos S, Chengalur-Smith I (2009) Determining process death based on censored activity data. Commun Stat Simul Comput 37(8):1647–1662

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Feller J, Fitzgerald B (2002) Understanding Open Source Software Development. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana F, Braione P, Zanoni M (2012) Automatic detection of bad smells in code: an experimental assessment. J Object Technol 11 (2):5:1–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Holck J, Jørgensen N (2005) Do not check in on red: control meets anarchy in two open source projects. In: Koch S (ed) Free/open source software development. IGI, Hershey, pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • IST (2014) Special issue on human factors in software development. In: Amrit C, Daneva M (eds) Inf Softw Technol (Forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakarontzas G. Stamelos I, Skalistis S, Naskos A (2012) Extracting components from open source: the component adaptation environment (COPE) approach. In: EUROMI- CRO-SEAA conference, pp 192–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu B (2010) Sentiment analysis and subjectivity. In: Indurkhya N, Damerau FJ (eds) Handbook of natural language processing. Now Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Madey G, Freeh V, Tynan R (2005) Modeling the free/open source software community: a quantitative investigation. In: Koch S (ed) Free/open source software development. IGI, Hershey, pp 203–221

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe T (1976) A complexity measure. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 2(4):308–320

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Michlmayr M (2004) Managing volunteer activity in free software projects. In: Proceedings of the 2004 USENIX annual technical conference, Freenix Track, pp 93–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Midha V, Palvia P (2012) Factors affecting the success of open source software. J Syst Softw 85(4):895–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz-Cornejo G, Seaman C, Gunes Koru A (2008) An empirical investigation into the adoption of open source software in hospitals. Int J Healthc Inf Syst Inform 3(3):16–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Querol del Amo M (2007) Open source software: critical review of scientific literature and other sources. MSc Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond E (1999) The cathedral and the bazaar. O’Reilly Media, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Samoladas I, Gousios G, Spinellis D, Stamelos I (2008) 4th International conference on open source systems, pp 237–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Samoladas I, Angelis L, Stamelos I (2010) Survival analysis on the duration of open source projects. Inf Softw Technol 52(9):902–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandred J (2002) Managing open source projects. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Sugumaran V, Rajagopalan B (2002) A framework for creating hybrid-open source software communities. Inf Syst J 12:7–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith N, Capiluppi A, Fernández-Ramil J (2006) Agent-based simulation of open source evolution. Softw Process Improv Pract 11(4):423–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sowe S, Stamelos I, Angelis L (2006) Identifying knowledge brokers that yield software engineering knowledge in OSS projects. Inf Softw Technol 48(11):1025–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas D, Hunt A (2004) Open source ecosystems. IEEE Softw 21(4):89–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynn D (2003) Organizational structure of open source projects: a life cycle approach. In: 7th Annual conference of the southern association for information systems

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Informatics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Ioannis Stamelos

Authors
  1. Ioannis Stamelos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ioannis Stamelos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

    Günther Ruhe

  2. Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden

    Claes Wohlin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stamelos, I. (2014). Management and Coordination of Free/Open Source Projects. In: Ruhe, G., Wohlin, C. (eds) Software Project Management in a Changing World. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55035-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55035-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55034-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55035-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation