Skip to main content

Empirical Analysis on the Economies of Scale of Natural Rubber Production: Based on the Panel Data of 86 Rubber Farms of HSF Between 1998 and 2007

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of 2013 World Agricultural Outlook Conference
  • 546 Accesses

Abstract

Based on the panel data of 86 rubber farms of HSF (Hainan State Farm) between 1998 and 2007, the number of rubber trees being tapped and annual output of tapping workers as variables were chosen in this paper, and the non-linear regression was applied to analyze natural rubber’s production scale, then two conclusions were drawn: (1) There was nonlinear economies of scale in natural rubber production of Hainan State Farms;(2) In theory, the optimal scale of rubber farm of HSF was 2322.2hm2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmad M, Quresh SK (1999) Recent evidence on farm size and land productivity: implications for public policy. Pak Dev Rev 38:1135–1153

    Google Scholar 

  • Assunção JJ, Ghatak M (2003) Can unobserved heterogeneity in farmer ability explain the inverse relationship between farm size and productivity. Econ Lett 80:189–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett CB (1996) On price risk and the inverse farm size-productivity relationship. J Dev Econ 51(2):193–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catter MR (1984) Identification of the inverse relationship between farm size and productivity: an empirical analysis of peasant agricultural production. Oxf Econ Pap New Ser 36(1):131–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase RH (1937) The nature of the firm. Econ New Ser 4(16):386–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorward A (1991) Farm size and productivity in Malawian smallholder agriculture. J Dev Stud 35(5):141–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer G (1991) Farm size, farm productivity re-examined: evidence from rural Egypt. J Peasant Stud 19(1):59–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan S, Chan-Kang C (2005) Is small beautiful? Farm size, productivity, and poverty in Asian agriculture. Agric Econ 32:135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feder G (1985) The relation between farm size and farm productivity: the role of family labor, supervision and credit constraints. J Dev Econ 18:297–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giovanni Andrea Cornia (1985) Farm size, land yields and the agricultural production function: an analysis for fifteen developing countries. World Dev 13(4):513–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadri K, Whittaker J (1999) Efficiency, environmental contaminants and farm size: testing for links using stochastic production frontiers. J Appl Econ 11(2):337–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfand SM, Levine ES (2004) Farm size and the determinants of productive efficiency in the Brazilian Center-West. Agric Econ 31(2–3):241–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rios AR, Shively GE (2005) Farm size and nonparametric efficiency measurements for coffee farms in Vietnam, Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Providence, Rhode Island, 24–27 July 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • RMC Netting (1993) Smallholders, householders: arm Families and the ecology of intensive, sustainable agriculture. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen AK (1962) An aspect of Indian agriculture. Econ Wkly 14(4–6):243–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen AK (1975) Employment, technology and development. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan TN (1972) Farm size and productivity: implications of choice under uncertainty. Ind J Stat 34(Series B):409–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend RF, Kirsten J, Vink N (1998a) Farm size productivity and returns to scale in agriculture revisited: a case study of wine producers in South Africa. Agric Econ 19(1–2):175–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend RF, Kirsten JF, Vink N (1998b) Agric Econ 19(1-2):175–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1983) Kenya: growth and structural change. Basic economic report, Africa Region

    Google Scholar 

  • Yujiro Hayami, Toshihiko Kawagoe (1989) Farm mechanization, scale economies and polarization: The Japanese experience. J Dev Econ 31(2):221–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-34).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Xu, N., Qi, N., Li, J. (2014). Empirical Analysis on the Economies of Scale of Natural Rubber Production: Based on the Panel Data of 86 Rubber Farms of HSF Between 1998 and 2007. In: Xu, S. (eds) Proceedings of 2013 World Agricultural Outlook Conference. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54389-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54389-0_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-54388-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-54389-0

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics