Abstract
The shape of the curve of the auditory sensitivity thresholds as a function of frequency is determined by the transfer function of the outer and middle ear. For a constant acoustic signal at the input to the cochlea the auditory sensitivity threshold is nearly constant. From theoretical results, it seems that the threshold of the neural responses appears always for the same velocity of the cochlear partition all along the cochlea.
Concerning the auditory fatigue, we applied to the guinea pig’s cochlea a constant acoustic energy (pure tones of frequency from 2 kHz to 11,3 kHz) during 20 minutes and we measured the TTS by electrocochleography twenty minutes after the end of the exposure (from 2 to 32 kHz by half-octave steps). For each animal, the level of the stimulus at the input to the cochlea was adjusted by means of cochlear microphonic measurements.
-
a)
In order to obtain a constant TTS for each frequency of stimulation, the acoustic level at the input to the cochlea must decrease by about 4 dB/octave.
-
b)
A constant TTS at 16 kHz and at 22.6 kHz, whatever the stimulation frequency is, is obtained for an acoustic level at the input of the cochlea decreasing by about 10 dB/octave.
Given the facts that, for a constant acoustic input to the cochlea:
-
the amplitude of the displacements of the cochlear partition near the CF doubles each time that the frequency is halved and consequently the velocity of the cochlear partition is constant,
-
the amplitude of the displacements of the cochlear partition at the base of the cochlea is constant for frequencies lower than CF and consequently the velocity of the cochlear partition at the base doubles with the frequency, the difference of slope between case a) and b), i.e. 6 dB/octave seems to indicate that the velocity of the cochlear partition is an important parameter which plays a significant role in the coming out of the auditory fatigue.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Dallos, P., “The auditory periphery.” Academic press, New York and London, pp.117 – 126, 1973.
Dancer, A. and Franke, R., “Intracochlear sound pressure measurements in guinea pigs.” Hearing Research 2, pp.191 – 205, 1980.
Johnstone, B. M., Robertson, D. and Cody, A., “Basilar membrane motion and hearing loss.” in: Hearing and hearing prophylaxis, Borchgrevink ed., Scand. Audiol. Suppl. 16, pp 89 – 93, 1982.
Liberman, M. J. and Mulroy, M. J., “Acute and chronic effects of acoustic trauma: Cochlear pathology and auditory nerve pathophysiology.” in: New Perspectives on Noise-induced Hearing Loss, ed. by R. P. Hamernik, D. Henderson, R. Salvi, Raven Press, New-York, pp. 105 – 135, 1982.
Peterson, L. C. and Bogert, B. P., “A dynamical theory of the cochlea.” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 22, pp. 369 – 381, 1950.
Prosen, C. A., Petersen, M. R., Moody, D. B. and Stebbing, W. C., “Auditory thresholds and kanamycin-induced hearing loss in the guinea pig assessed by a positive reinforcement procedure.” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, pp. 559 – 566, 1978.
Zwislocki, J., “Theorie der Schneckenmechanik.” (Thesis), Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. LXXII, pp. 50–51, 1948.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dancer, A., Franke, R., Campo, P. (1986). Thresholds of Auditory Sensitivity and Auditory Fatigue: Relation with Cochlear Mechanics. In: Allen, J.B., Hall, J.L., Hubbard, A.E., Neely, S.T., Tubis, A. (eds) Peripheral Auditory Mechanisms. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, vol 64. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50038-1_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50038-1_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-16095-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-50038-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive