Skip to main content

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Construction and Demolition Waste Management Strategies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate

Abstract

Construction and demolition (C&D) waste management, as an important aspect of sustainable development, has become a hot research topic. Many researchers and organizations have been conducting related research in recent years, and have proposed several waste management strategies on both regional level and project level. However, what are the most effective strategies have not been investigated. To fill up this research gap, this study firstly conducted a thorough literature review to summarize the existing C&D waste management strategies. Then, a questionnaire survey was employed to evaluate the effectiveness of these strategies according to the practical experiences of construction practitioners. The results show that the practitioners regard the current C&D waste management is not applied well. And four most effective C&D waste management strategies are examined, namely “effective on-site management”, “establishment of competitive recycling market”, “issuance of incentive policies”, and “reasonable and proper design”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bossink BAG, Brouwers HJH (1996) Construction waste: quantification and source evaluation. J Constr Eng Manag 122:55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen Z, Li H, Wong CTC (2002) An application of bar-code system for reducing construction wastes. Autom Constr 11:521–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. EPD (2012) Hong Kong waste treatment and disposal statistics. Available form http://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/english/environmentinhk/waste/data/stat_treat.html. Accessed 23 August

  4. Jaillon L, Poon CS, Chiang YH (2009) Quantifying the waste reduction potential of using prefabrication in building construction in Hong Kong. Waste Manag 29:309–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Laquatra J, Pierce M (2009) Taking construction site waste management to the next level. J Green Build 4:29–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu WS, Yuan HP (2011) A framework for understanding waste management studies in construction. Waste Manag 31:1252–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Peng C-L, Scorpio DE, Kibert CJ (1997) Strategies for successful construction and demolition waste recycling operations. Constr Manag Econ 15:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Poon CS (1997) Management and recycling of demolition waste in Hong Kong. Waste Manag Res 15:561–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Poon CS, Yu ATW, Jaillon L (2004) Reducing building waste at construction sites in Hong Kong. Constr Manag Econ 22:461–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Poon CS, Yu ATW, Ng LH (2001) On-site sorting of construction and demolition waste in Hong Kong. Resour Conserv Recycl 32:157–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Poon CS, Yu ATW, See SC, Cheung E (2004) Minimizing demolition wastes in Hong Kong public housing projects. Constr Manag Econ 22:799–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Poon CS, Yu ATW, Wong SW, Cheung E (2004) Management of construction waste in public housing projects in Hong Kong. Constr Manag Econ 22:675–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Su X, Andoh AR, Cai H, Pan J, Kandil A, Said HM (2012) GIS-based dynamic construction site material layout evaluation for building renovation projects. Autom Constr 27:40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tam VWY, Tam CM, Zeng SX, Ng WCY (2007) Towards adoption of prefabrication in construction. Build Environ 42:3642–3654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang JY, Yuan HP, Kang XP, Lu WS (2010) Critical success factors for on-site sorting of construction waste: a China study. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:931–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu ATW, Poon CS, Wong A, Yip R, Jaillon L (2013) Impact of construction waste disposal charging scheme on work practices at construction sites in Hong Kong. Waste Manag 33:138–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yuan F, Hao JL, Shen LY, Li QM (2008) Energy evaluation indices for valuing construction and demolition wastes recycling. 2008 4th international conference on wireless communications, networking and mobile computing, vols 1–31, pp 8184–8189

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao W, Leeftink RB, Rotter VS (2010) Evaluation of the economic feasibility for the recycling of construction and demolition waste in China-the case of Chongqing. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:377–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zezhou Wu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wu, Z., Yu, A.T.W. (2014). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Construction and Demolition Waste Management Strategies. In: Yang, D., Qian, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-44916-1_51

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics