Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rekonstruktive Mikrochirurgie in der Urologie

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Praktische Mikrochirurgie

  • 2407 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Am 31. Oktober 2011 wurde laut Weltbevölkerungsbericht der Vereinten Nationen (www.weltbevoelkerung.de) der 7 Milliardenste Erdenbürger geboren. Auch wenn es nur ein symbolisches Datum ist, so wuchs damit die Bevölkerung der Erde in den letzten 12 Jahren um 1 Milliarde Menschen. Maßnahmen zur Familienplanung und Geburtenkontrolle stehen deshalb ganz oben auf der Agenda der UN und vieler Staaten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

Literatur zu Abschn. 5.1

  1. Bagshaw HA, Masters JRW, Pryor JP. Factors influencing the outcome of vasectomy reversal. Brit J Urol 1980; 52: 57–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Belker AM. Vasectomy reversal. Urol Clin N Am 1987; 14: 155–166

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Belker AM, Thomas AJ, Fuchs EF, Konnak JW, Sharlip ID. Results of 1.469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the Vasovasostomy Study Group. J Urol 1991; 145: 505–511

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Belker AM. Microsurgical vasovasostomy: two-layer technique. In: Goldstein M (Ed) Surgery of male infertility. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1995; p. 61–66

    Google Scholar 

  5. Belker AM. Editorial: Evaluation of partial anastomotic obstruction after vasovasostomy and predictors of success after vasoepididymostomy. J Urol 1998; 159: 835–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Belker AM. Editorial comment. J Urol 2002; 167: 1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Berardinucci D, Zini A, Jarvi K. Outcome of microsurgical reconstruction in men with suspected epididymal obstruction. J Urol 1998; 159: 831–834

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Berger RE. Triangulation end-to-side vasoepididymostomy. J Urol 1998; 159: 1951–1953

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Boorjian S, Lipkin M, Goldstein M. The impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on outcome of vasectomy reversal. J Urol 2004; 171: 304–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boyarski S. Operating microscope for vasovasostomy. South Med J 1973; 66: 302–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brandell RA, Li PS, Goldstein M. Vasovasostomy. Atlas Urol Clin N Am 1999; 7: 45–64

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chan PTK, Goldstein M. Outcomes of microsurgical vasectomy reversal in men with the same female partners. J Urol 2001; 165: 307 Suppl

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chan PTK, Li PS, Goldstein M. Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: a prospective randomized study of 3 intussusception techniques in rats. J Urol 2003; 169: 1924–1929

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chan PT, Goldstein M. Superior outcomes of microsurgical vasectomy reversal in men with the same female partners. Fertil Steril 2004; 81: 1371–1374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chan PTK, Brandell RA, Goldstein M. Prospective analysis of outcomes after microsurgical intussusception vasoepididymostomy. Brit J Urol 2005; 96: 598–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chawla A, O’Brien J, Lisi M, Zini A, Jarvi K. Should all urologists performing vasectomy reversals be able to perform vasoepididymostomies if required? J Urol 2004; 172: 1048–1050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Crain DS, Roberts JL, Amling CL. Practice patterns in vasectomy reversal surgery: results of a questionnaire study among practicing urologists. J Urol 2004; 171: 311–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Crais TF. Reproductive and urogenital microsurgery. Clin Plast Surg 1983; 10: 155–171

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Deck AJ, Berger RE. Should vasectomy reversal be performed in men with older female partners? J Urol 2000; 163: 105–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dewire DW, Thomas AJ. Microsurgical end-to-side vasoepididymostomy. In: Goldstein M (ed.) Surgery of male infertility. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1995; p. 128–134

    Google Scholar 

  21. DIR Jahrbuch 2007. Deutsches IVF Register, Bad Segeberg 2008

    Google Scholar 

  22. Diveev A, Schierbaum K, Engelmann U. Stand der Mikrochirurgie in Deutschland – eine Umfrage im Jahr 2003. Vortrag 50. Tagung der Nordrhein-Westfälischen Gesellschaft für Urologie, Bonn, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dohle GR, Jungwirth A, Kopa Z, Giwercman A, Diemer T, Hargreave TB. Guidelines on male infertility. European Association of Urology 2009; www.uroweb.org/professional-resources/guidelines

  24. Dohle GR, Tournaye H. Should vasectomy reversal be performed in men with older female partners? Urologe A 2001; 40: Suppl 1, 42

    Google Scholar 

  25. Engelmann U, Deindl F, Hertle L, Wilbert D, Senge T. Die Refertilisierungssituation in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland – Ergebnisse einer Umfrage. Urologe B 1989; 29: 29–33

    Google Scholar 

  26. Engelmann UH, Schramek P, Tomamichel G, Deindl F, Senge T. Vasectomy reversal in central Europe: results of a questionnaire of urologists in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. J Urol 1990; 143: 64–67

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fazeli-Matin S, Morrison G, Goldstein M. What is the pregnancy rate in vasovasostomy and varicocelectomy patients who are “lost to follow-up”? J Urol 1994; 151: 303 Suppl

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fleming C. Robot-assisted vasovasostomy. Urol Clin N Am 2004; 31: 769–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fodgestam I, Fall M. Microsurgical end-to-end and end-to-side epididymovasostomy to correct occlusive azoospermia. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 17: 137–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fox M. Failed vasectomy reversal: is a further attempt worthwile using microsurgery? Eur Urol 1997; 31: 436–438

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fuchs EF, Burt RA. Vasectomy reversal performed 15 years or more after vasectomy: correlation of pregnancy outcome with partner age and with pregnancy results of the in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmatic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 2002; 77: 516–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gerrard ER, Sandlow JI, Oster RA, Burns JR, Box LC, Kolettis PN. Effect of female partner age on pregnancy rates after vasectomy reversal. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: 1340–1344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Goldstein M, Li PS, Matthews GJ. Microsurgical vasovasostomy: the microdot technique of precision suture placement. J Urol 1998; 159: 188–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hamidinia A, Beck AD, van Beek AK. Modified technique for microsurgical vasovasostomy. Invest Urol 1979; 17: 42–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Heidenreich A, Altmann P, Neubauer S, Engelmann UH. Die mikrochirurgische Vasovasostomie im Zeitalter der modernen Reproduktionsmedizin. Eine Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse. Urologe A 2000; 39: 240–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hernandez J, Sabanegh ES. Repeat vasectomy reversal after initial failure: overall results and predictors for success. J Urol 1999; 161: 1153–1156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hinz S, Rais-Bahrami S, Kempkensteffen C, Weiske WH, Schrader M, Magheli A. Fertility rates following vasectomy reversal: importance of age of the female partner. Urol Int 2008; 81: 416–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hollingsworth MR, Sandlow JI, Schrepferman CG. Repeat vasectomy reversal yields high success rates. Fertil Steril 2007; 88: 217–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jarow JP, Espeland MA, Lipshultz LI. Evaluation of the azoospermic patient. J Urol 1989; 142: 62–65

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Jarow JP, Sigman M, Buch JP, Oates RD. Delayed appearance of sperm after end-to-side vasoepididymostomy. J Urol 1995; 153: 1156–1158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Jequier AM. Edward J Martin (1859–1938). The founding father of modern clinical andrology. Int J Androl 2008; 14: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kidd CF, Fuchs EF. Pregnancy rate after vasectomy reversal as a function of the female partner age. J Urol 2001; 165: Suppl. 307

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kim SW, Ku JH, Park K, Son H, Paick JS. A different female partner does not affect the success of second vasectomy reversal. J Androl 2005; 26: 48–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kim HH, Goldstein M. History of the vasectomy reversal. Urol Clin N Am 2009; 36: 359–373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Klosterhalfen H, Wagenknecht LV, Becker H, Huland H, Schirren C. Operationsresultate der Epididymo-Vasostomie und der Vasovasostomie. Urologe A 1983; 22: 25–28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Klosterhalfen H. Operative Therapie der Infertilität des Mannes. Helv chir Acta 1984; 51: 339–344

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kolettis PN, Thomas AJ. Vasoepididymstomy for vasectomy reversal: a critical assessment in the era of intracytoplasmatic sperm injection. J Urol 1997; 158: 467–470

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kolettis PN. The evaluation and management of the azoospermic patient. J Androl 2002; 23: 293–305

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kolettis PN, D`Amico AM, Box L. Outcomes for vasovasostomy with bilateral intravasal azoospermia. J Androl 2003; 24: 22–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kolettis PN, Burns JR, Nangia AK. Outcomes for vasovasostomy performed when only sperm parts are present in the vasal fluid. J Androl 2006; 27: 565–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Konrad G, Mast GJ, Schwaiger R, Ziegler M. Mikrochirurgie in der Urologie. Urologe A 1984; 23: 244–250

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Kuang W, Shin PR, Matin S, Thomas AJ. Initial evaluation of robotic technology for microsurgical vasovasostomy. J Urol 2004; 171: 300–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lee R, Li PS, Goldstein M, Tanrikut C, Schattman G, Schlegel PN. A decision analysis of treatments for obstructive azoospermia. Human Reprod 2008; 23: 2043–2049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Lespinasse VD. Obstructive sterility 2 the male. Treatment by direct vaso-epididymostomy. JAMA 1918; 70: 448–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Marmar JL. Management of the epididymal tubule during an end-to-side vasoepididymostomy. J Urol 1995; 154: 93–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Marmar JL. Modified vasoepididymostomy with simultaneous double needle placement, tubulotomy and tubular invagination. J Urol 2000; 163: 483–486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Matthews GJ, Schlegel PN, Goldstein M. Patency following microsurgical vasoepididymostomy and vasovasostomy: temporal considerations. J Urol 1995; 154: 2070–2073

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Matthews GJ, McGee K, Goldstein M. Microsurgical reconstruction following failed vasectomy reversal. J Urol 1997; 157: 844–846

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Meng MV, Greene KL, Turek PJ. Surgery or assisted reproduction? A decision analysis of treatment costs in male infertility. J Urol 2005; 174: 1926–1931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Nagler HM, Jung H. Factors predicting successful microsurgical vasectomy reversal. Urol Clin N Am 2009; 36: 383–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Niederberger C, Makhlouf AA. Vasectomy reversal in the presence of diminished ovarian reserve: a complex clinical conundrum. J Androl 2006; 27: 3–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Oesterwitz H, Lenk S, Engel S, Krüger G. Diagnostik und Therapie der Verschlußazoospermie. Z Urol Nephrol 1982; 75: 473–481

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Oesterwitz H, Lebentrau J. Fehler und Gefahren bei der Refertilisierungsoperation. Med Report 2004; 28: 3

    Google Scholar 

  64. Oesterwitz H, Oesterwitz K, Schott H. Ergebnisse der mikrochirurgischen Refertilisierungsoperation bei 1.000 Patienten nach Vasektomie. Urol Urogynäkol 2010; 17: 47–50

    Google Scholar 

  65. Owen ER. Microsurgical vasovasostomy: a reliable vasectomy reversal. Aust NZ J Surg 1977; 47: 305–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Owen ER, Kapila H. Vasectomy reversal–Review of 475 microsurgical vasovasostomies. Med J Aust 1984; 140: 398–400

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Owen ER. Microsurgery in common cases of male infertility. Int Surg 2006; 91: Suppl 85–89

    Google Scholar 

  68. Paick JS, Park JY, Park DW, Son H, Kim SW. Microsurgical vasovasostomy after failed vasovasostomy. J Urol 2003; 169: 1052–1055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmatic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 1992; 340: 17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Parakattil SJ, Kuang W, Agarwal A, Thomas AJ. Model to predict if a vasoepididymostomy will be required for vasectomy reversal. J Urol 2005; 173: 1681–1684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Parakattil SJ, Kuang W, Kolettis PN, Pasqualotto FF, Teloken P Teloken C, Nangia AK, Daitch JA, Niederberger C, Thomas AJ. Multi-institutional validation of vasectomy reversal predictor. J Urol 2006; 175: 247–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Parakattil SJ, Moran ME. Robotic instrumentation: evolution and microsurgical applications. Indian J Urol 2010; 26: 395–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Pasqualotto FF; Agarwal A, Srivastava M, Nelson DR, Thomas AJ. Fertility outcome after repeat vasoepididymostomy. J Urol 1999; 162: 1626–1628

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Pavlovich CP, Schlegel PN. Fertility options after vasectomy: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Fertil Steril 1997; 67: 133–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Pierpaoli S, Mulhall JP. Vasectomy reversal in the age of intracytoplasmatic sperm injection. Curr Opinion Urol 1998; 8: 531–534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Vasectomy reversal. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: S78–82

    Google Scholar 

  77. Rosenwaks Z, Davis O, Damaris M. The role of maternal age in assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 165–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Sandlow JI, Kolettis PN. Vasovasostomy in the convoluted vas deferens: indications and outcomes. J Urol 2005; 173: 540–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Schiff J, Li PS, Goldstein M. Robotic microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: a prospective randomized study in a rat model. J Urol 2004; 171: 1720–1725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Schiff J, Chan P, Li PS, Finkelberg S, Goldstein M. Outcome and late failures compared in 4 techniques of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy in 153 consecutive men. J Urol 2005; 174: 651–655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Schlegel PN, Goldstein M. Micosurgical vasoepididymostomy: refinement and results. J Urol 1993; 150: 1165–1168

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Schoor RA, Ross L, Niederberger C. Robotic assisted microsurgical vasal reconstruction in a model system. World J Urol 2003; 21: 48–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Schultheiss D, Denil J. History of the microscope and development of microsurgery: a revolution for reproductive tract surgery. Andrologia 2002; 34: 234–241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Schwarzer J, Kropp U, Jakse G. Vasovasostomie – Indikation, Technik, Ergebnisse. In: Schwarzer J, Kropp U (Hrsg.) Urologische Mikrochirurgie. Nürnberg: Mc Graw-Hill, 1991; S. 27–34

    Google Scholar 

  85. Schwarzer JU. Mikrochirurgie in der Urologie. Dtsch Ärztebl 1992; 89: 2948–2954

    Google Scholar 

  86. Schwarzer JU, Pickl U, Hofmann R, Hartung R. Mikrochirurgische Therapie der Verschlußazoospermie. Urologe A 1994; 33: 49–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Schwarzer JU. Refertilisierung nach Vasektomie. Ärztl Praxis 2007; 3: 34–36

    Google Scholar 

  88. Schwarzer JU, Weiß S, Fiedler K, von Hertwig I, Krüsmann G, Würfel W, Schleyer M. Refertilisierung und ICSI bei obstruktiver Azoospermie. J Reproduktionsmed Endokrinol 2010; 7: 408–412

    Google Scholar 

  89. Sharlip I. Absence of fluid during vasectomy reversal has no prognostic significance. J Urol 1996; 155: 365–369

    Google Scholar 

  90. Sheynkin YR, Schulsinger DA. Reconstructive surgery of male infertility: milestones in centennial history. J Urol 2002; 167: Suppl 185–186

    Google Scholar 

  91. Shridharani A, Sandlow JI. Vasectomy reversal versus IVF with sperm retrieval: which is better? Curr Opin Urol 2010; 20: 503–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Sigman M. The relationship between intravasal sperm quality and patency rates after vasovasostomy. J Urol 2004; 171: 307–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Silber SJ. Microsurgery in clinical urology. Urology 1975; 6: 150–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Silber SJ. Microscopic technique for reversal of vasectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1976; 143: 630–631

    Google Scholar 

  95. Silber SJ. Microscopic vasectomy reversal. Fertil Steril 1977; 28: 1191–1202

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Silber SJ. Microscopic vasoepididymostomy: specific microanastomosis to the epididymal tubule. Fertil Steril 1978; 30: 565–571

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Silber SJ. Epididymal extravasation following vasectomy as a cause for failure of vasectomy reversal. Fertil Steril 1979; 31: 309–315

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Silber SJ. Microsurgery of the male genitalia: non-vascular. In: Silber SJ (ed.) Microsurgery. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1979; p. 307–375

    Google Scholar 

  99. Silber SJ. Reversal of vasectomy and the treatment of male infertility. J Androl 1980; 1: 261–268

    Google Scholar 

  100. Silber SJ. Results of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: role of epididymis in sperm maturation. Hum Reprod 1989;4:298–303

    Google Scholar 

  101. Silber SJ, Grotjan HE. Microscopic vasectomy reversal 30 years later: a summary of 4.010 cases by the same surgeon. J Androl 2004; 25: 845–859

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Singh I, Kaza RCM. A case in favour of one sided microscopic vasovasostomy–the New Dehli experience. Int Urol Nephrol 1996; 28: 27–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Singh DR, Lo KC, Jarvi KA. Does duration of vasectomy affect the outcome of vasectomy reversal procedures? J Urol 2005; 173: 368 Suppl

    Google Scholar 

  104. Taylor GS, Fuchs EF. During vasectomy reversal surgery, the probability of epididymal bypass rather than vasovasostomy increases as the time from vasectomy lengthens. J Urol 2005; 173: 446, Suppl

    Google Scholar 

  105. Thomas AJ. Persönliche Mitteilung. 1984

    Google Scholar 

  106. Thomas AJ. Vasoepididymostomy. Urol Clin N Am 1987; 14: 527–538

    Google Scholar 

  107. Thomas AJ, Howards SS. Microsurgical treatment of male infertility. In: Lipshultz LI, Howards SS (eds.) Infertility in the male. St.Louis: Mosby, 1997; p. 371–384

    Google Scholar 

  108. Thomas AJ. Vasoepididymostomy. Atlas Urol Clin N Am 1999; 7: 65–90

    Google Scholar 

  109. Wagenknecht LV. Andrologische Urologie. Z Urol Nephrol 1982; 75: 197–203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Wagenknecht LV, Ambulante mikrochirurgische Rekonstruktion der Samenwege. Fertilität 1990; 6: 150–155

    Google Scholar 

  111. Wagenknecht LV. Mikrochirurgie der Samenleiter. Sexualmedizin 1990; 19: 376–382

    Google Scholar 

  112. Wagenknecht LV. Vasovasostomy. In: Colpi GM, Balerna M (Hrsg.) Treating male infertility. Basel: Karger, 1994; p. 165–186

    Google Scholar 

  113. Weiske WH. Strategie und Technik der Tubulovasostomie und der Gewinnung von Nebenhodenspermatozoen. In Schwarzer J, Kropp U (Hrsg.) Urologische Mikrochirurgie. Nürnberg: Mc Graw-Hill, 1991; S. 35–50

    Google Scholar 

  114. Weiske WH. Ergebnisse der mikrochirurgischen Refertilisierung bei unerfülltem Kinderwunsch. Urologe B 1996; 36: 348–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Weiske WH, Schulze W. Spermatogenese nach Vasektomie. Urologe A 1996; 35: Suppl 1, 63

    Google Scholar 

  116. Weiske WH. Mikrochirurgische Refertilisierung nach Vasektomie: aktueller Stand. J Fertil Reprod 2000; 10: 7–14

    Google Scholar 

  117. Würfel W. Methoden der assistierten Reproduktion bei andrologischen Indikationen. Blickpunkt der Mann 2007; 5: 4–11

    Google Scholar 

  118. Zepnick H, Matz H, Adler D. Ergebnisse nach mikrochirurgischer Epididymovasostomie. Z Urol Nephrol 1985; 78: 105–110

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Mc Clure RD. Microsurgical vasal reconstruction: vasovasostpmy. Atlas Urol Clin N Am 1996; 4: 21–40

    Google Scholar 

Literatur zu Abschn. 5.2

  1. Aboseif S, Gomez R, McAninch JW. Genital self mutilation. J Urol 1993; 150: 1143–1146

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Babaei AR, Safarinejad MR. Penile replantation, science or myth? A systematic review. Urology J 2007; 4: 62–65

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baumeister RG, Brandl H, Chaussy C, Schilling A. Mikrochirurgische Penisreplantation nach Selbstverstümmelung. Urologe A 1983; 22: 235–237

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhatt YC, Vyas KA, Srivastava RK, Panse NS. Microneurovascular reimplantation in a case of total penile amputation. Indian J Plast Surg 2008; 41: 206–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brennecke HJ, Flietner T. Erfolgreiche Penisreplantation nach Autoemaskulation in suizidaler Absicht. Urologe A 1995; 34: 231–234

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carroll PR, Lue TF, Schmidt RA, Trengrove-Jones G, McAninch JW. Penile replantation: current concepts. J Urol 1985; 133: 281–285

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chou EK, Tai YT, WU CI, Chen HH, Chang SC. Penile replantation, complication management and technique refinement. Microsurgery 2008; 28: 153–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen BE, May JW, Daly JSF, Young HH. Successful clinical replantation of an amputated penis by microneurovascular repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 1977; 59: 279–283

    Google Scholar 

  9. Darewicz B, Galek L, Darewicz J, Kudelski J, Malczyk E. Successful microsurgical replantation of an amputated penis. Int Urol Nephrol 2001; 33: 385–386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fuller A, Bolt J, Carney B. Successful microsurgical penile replantation after a workplace injury. Urol Int 2007; 78: 10–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gyan S, Sushma S, Maneesh S, Rajesh S, Misra MC. Successful microsurgical penile replantation following self amputation in a schizophrenic patient. Indian J Urol 2010; 26: 434–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamann F, Sabri W, Melchior H. Penisreplantation nach Autoamputation. Z Urol Nephrol 1983; 76: 361–367

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Henriksson TG, Hahne B, Hakelius L, Lantto S, Norlen BJ. Microsurgical replantation of an amputated penis. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1980; 14: 111–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Heymann AD, Bell-Thomson J, Rathod DM, Heller LE. Successful reimplantation of the penis using microvascular techniques. J Urol 1977; 118: 879–880

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Landström JT, Schuyler RW, Macris GP. Microsurgical penile replantation facilitated by postoperative HBO treatment. Microsurgery 2004; 24: 49–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Klippel KF, Rudigier J, Walde HJ, Riedmiller H. Die mikrochirurgische Versorgung einer traumatischen Penisamputation. Akt Urol 1980; 11: 257–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kropp W, Ingianni G, Schwarzer JU, Biemer E. Mikrochirurgische Penisreplantation. In: Schwarzer JU, Kropp W (Hrsg.) Urologische Mikrochirurgie. Nürnberg: McGraw-Hill, 1991; S. 89–95

    Google Scholar 

  18. Salem HK, Mostafa T. Primary anastomosis of the traumatically amputated penis. Andrologia 2009; 41: 264–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Strauch B, Sharzer LA, Petro J, Greenstein B. Replantation of amputated parts of the penis, nose, ear and scalp. Clin Plast Surg 1983; 10: 115–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tamai S, Nakamura Y, Motomiya Y. Microsurgical replantation of a completely amputated penis and scrotum: a case report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1977; 60: 287–292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Volkmer BG, Maier S. Successful penile replantation following autoamputation: twice! Int J Impotence Res 2002; 14: 197–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wandschneider G, Hellbom B, Pummer K, Primus G. Successful replantation of a totally amputated penis using microvascular techniques. Urol Int 1990; 45: 177–180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zoelly A, von Wartburg U. Replantationschirurgie am Penis. Helv Chir Acta 1991; 58: 313–318

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhong-wei, Dong-yue Y, Sheng D. Microsurgery. Heidelberg, Berlin, New York: Springer,1982

    Google Scholar 

Literatur zu Abschn. 5.3

  1. Abolyosr A. Laparoscopic versus open orchiopexy in the management of abdominal testis: a descriptive study. Int J Urol 2006; 13: 1421–1424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bianchi A. The impalpable testis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1995; 77: 3–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Boddy SA, Gordon AC, Thomas DFM. Experience with the Fowler Stephens and microvascular procedures in the management of intra-abdominal testes. Brit J Urol 1991; 68: 199–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boeckx W, Vereecken R, Depuydt K. Microsurgery for intra-abdominal testicular retention. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998; 81: 191–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bukowski TP, Wacksman J, Billmire DA, Lewis AG, Sheldon CA. Testicular autotransplantation: a 17-year review of an effective approach to the management of the intraabdominal testis. J Urol 1995; 154: 558–561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bukowski TP, Wacksman J, Billmire DA, Sheldon CA. Testicular autotransplantation for the intra-abdominal testis. Microsurgery 1995; 16: 290–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang B, Palmer LS, Franco I. Laparoscopic orchiopexy: a review of a large clinical series. BJU Int 2001; 87: 490–493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Darewicz J, Kudelski J, Galek L, Darewicz B. Autotransplantation of the testis as a method of cryptorchidism treatment. Helv Chir Acta 1993; 60: 363–366

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Denes FT, Saito FJ, Silva FA, Giron AM, Machado M, Srougi M. Laparoscopic diagnosis and treatment of nonpalpable testis. Int Braz J Urol 2008; 34: 329–335

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Elyas R, Guerra LA, Pike J, DeCarli C, Betollli M, Bass J, Chou S, Sweeney B, Rubin S, Barrowman N, Moher D, Leonard M. Is staging beneficial for Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy? A systematic review. J Urol 2010; 183: 2012–2018

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fowler R, Stephens FD. The role of testicular vascular anatomy in the salvage of high undescended testes. In: Stephens FD (ed.) Congenital malformations of the rectum, anus and genitourinary tracts. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1963; p. 306–320

    Google Scholar 

  12. Giuliani L, Carmignani G, Belgrano E, Puppo P. Autotransplantation des testicules dans la cryptorchidie abdominale. J Urol Nephrol 1981; 87: 279–282

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hamidinia A. Testicular function after orchiopexy. Urology 1985; 26: 281–28

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harrison CB, Kaplan GW, Scherz HC, Packer MG, Jones J. Microvascular autotransplantation of the intra-abdominal testis. J Urol 1990; 144: 506–507

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hinman F. Unilateral abdominal cryptorchidism. J Urol 1979; 122: 71

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kadowaki H, Yakami T. Basic study of microsurgical orchidopexy for high undescended testis: assessment of clinical applicability. J Pediat Surg 1979; 14: 544–550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kelley BP, Higuera S, Cisek LJ, Friedman J, Heller L. Combined laparoscopic and microsurgical techniques for testicular autotransplantation: is this still an evolving technique? J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26: 555–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lintula H, Kokki H, Eskelinen M, Vanamo K. Laparoscopic versus open orchiopexy in children with intra-abdominal testes. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2008; 18: 449–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Martinis FG, Nagler HM. Testicular autotransplantation. Atlas Urol Clin N Am 1996; 4: 95–110

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oesterwitz H, Althaus P, Schönberger B. Testicular autotransplantation for intraperitoneal cryptorchidism in childhood. A case against neglecting the venous anastomosis. Eur Urol 1987; 13: 217–218

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Oesterwitz H, Fahlenkamp D. Klinische Hodentransplantation. Übersicht zu Indikationsstellung, Operationstechnnik und Ergebnissen bei der Auto-, Allo- und Isotransplantation. Z Urol Nephrol 1987; 80: 525–532

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Oesterwitz H, Fahlenkamp D. Microsurgical technique and results of testicular autotransplantation in children–essential venous anastomosis. Int Urol Nephrol 1993; 25: 587–593

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Perovic S, Milanovic D, Parabucki D, Stefanovic M, Kristic Z. Successful autotransplantation of intra-abdominal testes into the scrotum using microvascular techniques. Acta Chir Jugosl 1989; 36: 117–126

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Salman FT, Fonkalsrud EW. Effects of spermatic vascular division for correction of high undescended testis on testicular function. Am J Surg 1990; 160: 506–510

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sharlip ID. Testicular revascularization using arterial without venous anastomosis for intraperitoneal cryptorchidism. Urology 1984; 24: 34–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shioschwili TJ, Kolobow GW, Battke H. Die Bedeutung der venösen Anastomose bei der Autotransplantation des Hodens. Z Urol Nephrol 1988; 81: 711–713

    Google Scholar 

  27. Silber SJ, Kelly J. Successful autotransplantation of an intra-abdominal testis to the scrotum by microvascular technique. J Urol 1976; 115: 452–454

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Silber SJ. The intra-abdominal testes: microvascular autotransplantation. J Urol 1981; 125: 329–333

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tackett LD, Wacksman J, Billmire D, Sheldon CA, Minevich E. The high intra-abdominal testis: technique and long-term success of laparoscopic testicular autotransplantation. J Endourol 2002; 16: 359–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Trombetta C, Siracusano S, Deriu M, Salisci E, Belgrano E. Bilateral abdominal testicles 2 the adult. Microsurgical and laparoscopic therapy. Minerva Urol Nefrol 1992; 44: 219–223

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wacksman J, Billmire DA, Lewis AG, Sheldon CA. Laparoscopically assisted testicular autotransplantation for management of the intraabdominal undescended testis. J Urol 1996; 156: 772–774

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Literatur zu Abschn. 5.4

  1. Ali El-Dein B, Osman Y, Shokeir AA;Shehab El-Dein AB, Sheashaa H, Ghoneim MA. Multiple arteries in live donor renal transplantation: surgical aspects and outcomes. J Urol 2003; 169: 2013–2017

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anson BJ, Richardson GA, Minear WL. Variations in the number and arrangement of the renal vessels; study of the blood supply of 400 kidneys. J Urol 1936; 36: 211–219

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barry JM, Lawson RK, Strong D, Hodges CV. Urologic complications in 173 kidney transplants. J Urol 1974; 112: 567–571

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Belzer FO, Kountz SL, Najarian JS, Tanaho EA, Hinman F. Prevention of urological complications after renal allotransplantation. Arch Surg 1970; 101: 449–452

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Belzer FO, Schweizer RT, Kountz SL. Management of multiple vessels in renal transplantation. Transplant Proc 1972; 4: 639–644

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Benoit G, Hammoudi Y, Moukarzel M, Bellamy J, Bensadoun H, Charpenter D, Fries D. Renal transplant reparative ex vivo surgery: prevention of vascular complications. Clin Transplant 1989; 3: 190–195

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berardinelli L. Best results in living donor transplantation using an aggressive policy in microsurgical bench reconstruction of nonoptimal arterial supply. Transplant Proc 2006; 38: 991–993

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bouchou F, Kamel G, Gelet A, Devonec M, Mougin M, Traeger J, Dubernard JM. Transplantation of kidneys with multiple renal arteries. Transplant Proc 1984; 16: 273–275

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brannen GE, Bush WH, Correa RJ, Gibbons RP, Cunies DM. Microvascular management of multiple renal arteries in transplantation. J Urol 1982; 128: 112–115

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Carter JT, Freise CE, McTaggart RA, Mahanty HD, Kang SM, Chan SH, Feng S, Roberts JP, Posselt AM. Laparoscopic procurement of kidneys with multiple renal arteries is associated with increased ureteral complications in the recipient. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 1312–1318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chin JL, Stiller CR. Microvascular surgery as an adjunctive tool in renal transplantation. Can J Surg 1986; 29: 263–266

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chin JL. Microvascular reconstructive “bench” surgery for donor kidneys before transplantation: techniques and results. J Urol 1989; 142: 23–27

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chin JL, Yip SK, McFarlane N. Clinical impact of adjunctive donor microvascular reconstruction on renal transplantation. Can J Urol 2003; 10: 1803–1808

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Codd JE, Anderson CB, Graff RJ, Gregory JG, Lucas BA, Newton WT. Vascular surgical problems in renal transplantation. Arch Surg 1974; 108: 876–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. De Coppi P, Giuliani S, Fusaro F, Zanetta G, Gamba P, Zanon GF. Cadaver kidney transplantation and vascular anomalies: a pediatric experience. Transplantation 2006; 82: 1042–1045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dubernard JM. Invited comment: complications of retrieval and preservation. Transplant Proc 1984; 16: 297–299

    Google Scholar 

  17. El-Sherbiny M, Abou-Elela A, Morsy A, Salah M, Foda A. The use of the inferior epigastric artery for accessory lower polar artery revascularization in live donor renal transplantation. Int Urol Nephrol 2008; 40: 283–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferreira MC, DeGomez G, Lucon MA, Tedesco-Marchese A, Campos-Freire G. Microvascular surgery: adjunct to renal transplantation. Urology 19975; 6: 733–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gil-Vernet JM, Caralps A, Revert L, Andreu J, Carretero P, Figuls J. Extracorporeal renal surgery – work bench surgery. Urology 1975; 5: 444–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gil-Vernet JM. Microscopic surgery in urology. World J Surg 1979; 3: 81–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Giuliani L, Carmignani G, Belgrano E, Puppo P. Microsurgery in urology. Int Surg 1981; 66: 41–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Goldman MH, Burleson RL, Tilney NL, Vineyard GC, Wilson RE. Calyceal-cutaneous fistulae in renal transplant patients. Ann Surg 1976; 184: 679–681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hricko GM, Birtch AG, Bennett AH, Wilson RE. Factor responsible for urinary fistula in the renal transplant recipient. Ann Surg 1973; 178: 609–612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hwang JK, Kim SD, Park SC, Choi BS, Kim Jl, Yang CW, Kim YS, Moon IS. The long-term outcomes of transplantation of kidneys with multiple arteries. Transplant Proc 2010; 42: 4053–4057

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kok NF, Dols LF, Hunink MG, Alwayn IP, Tran KT, Weimar WE, Ijzermans JN. Complex vascular anatomy in live kidney donation: imaging and consequences for clinical outcome. Transplantation 2008; 85: 1760–1765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kumar A, Gupta RS, Srivastava A, Bansal P. Sequential anastomosis of accessory renal artery to inferior epigastric artery in the management of multiple arteries in live related renal transplantation: a critical appraisal. Clin Transplant 2001; 15: 131–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Loughlin KR, Tilney NL, Richie JP. Urologic complications in 718 renal transplant patients. Surgery 1984; 95: 297–302

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Makiyama K, Tanabe K, Ishida H, Tokumoto T, Shimmura H, Omoto K, Toma H. Successful renovascular reconstruction for renal allografts with multiple renal arteries. Transplantation 2003; 75: 828–832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Merkel FK, Strauss AK, Andersen O, Bannett AD. Microvascular techniques for polar artery reconstruction in kidney transplants. Surgery 1976; 79: 253–261

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Merklin RJ, Michels NA. The variant renal and suprarenal blood supply with data on the inferior phrenic, ureteral and gonadal arteries. J Int Coll Surg 1958; 29: 41–76

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mersa B, Gürkan A, Ozcelik B, Kacar S, Varilsüha C, Turunc V, Bas S, Server S. Anastomosis of accessory arteries via microsurgical technique in renal transplantation. Transplant Proc 2011; 43: 819–821

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Novick AC, Magnusson M, Braun WE. Multiple-artery renal transplantation: emphasis on extracorporeal methods donor arterial reconstruction. J Urol 1979; 122: 731–735

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Novick AC, Straffon RA. Extracorporeal microvascular arterial reconstruction in donor kidneys prior to transplantation. J Microsurg 1979; 1: 94–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Novick AC. Use of inferior epigastric artery for extracorporeal microvascular branch renal artery reconstruction. Surgery 1981; 89: 513–517

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. O’Donoghue EPH, Chisholm GD, Shackman R. Urinary fistula after renal transplantation. Br J Urol 1973; 28: 28–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Oesterwitz H, Althaus P, May G, Schröder K, Strobelt V, Kaden J. Microvascular surgery in experimental and clinical kidney transplantation. Int Urol Nephrol 1983; 15: 347–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Oesterwitz H, Althaus P, Scholz D, Mebel M. Experimental and clinical application of microsurgery in kidney transplantation. Acta Urol Belg 1983; 51: 385–393

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Oesterwitz H, Müller JHA, Schröder K. Mikrochirurgische extrakorporale Nierenarterienrekonstruktion. Experimentelle Untersuchungen am Nierenautotransplantationsmodell beim Hund. Z Exper Chirurg 1984; 17: 209–215

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Oesterwitz H, Strobelt V, Scholz D, Mebel M. Extracorporeal microsurgical repair of injured multiple donor kidney arteries prior to cadaveric allotransplantation. Eur Urol 1985; 11: 100–105

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Oesterwitz H, Strobelt V, Blank W, Müller P. Methoden der extrakorporalen Nierenarterienrekonstruktion bei der Leichennierenallotransplantation unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Mikrochirurgie. Z Urol Nephrol 1985; 78: 433–445

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Oesterwitz H, Strobelt V, Müller P. Repair of injured donor kidney arteries. Eurotransplant Newsletter 1991; 86: 10–11

    Google Scholar 

  42. Peck JW, Anson BJ. The renal vascular pedicle: an anatomical study of 430 body halves. J Urol 1940; 44: 411–431

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ploeg RJ, van Schilfgaarde R, Felthuis W, Persijn G, Cohen B. Incidence of surgical lesions in cadaveric donor kidneys. Transplant Proc 1984; 16: 120–121

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ploeg RJ, van Schilfgaarde R, Felthuis W, Persijn G, Cohen B. Incidence of surgical lesions in cadaveric donor kidneys in relation to graft survival. Transplant Proc 1984; 16: 267–269

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rosenthal JT, Denny D, Hakala TR. Results from a single kidney procurement center. J Urol 1983; 129: 1111–1113

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Salaman JR, Clarke AG, Crosby DL. The management of kidney transplants damaged during their removal from the donor. Br J Urol 1974; 46: 173–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Salvatierra O, Kountz SL, Belzer FO. Prevention of ureteral fistula after renal transplantation. J Urol 1974; 112: 445–448

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Terpstra JL, Dicke WH. Eurotransplant Manual. Leiden 1980

    Google Scholar 

  49. Troppmann C, Wiesmann K, McVicar JP, Wolfe BM, Perez RV. Increased transplantation of kidneys with multiple renal arteries in the laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy era: surgical technique and surgical and nonsurgical donor and recipient outcomes. Arch Surg 2001; 136: 897–907

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Tzakis AG, Mazzaferro V, Pan CE, Gordon RD, Todo S, Makowka L, Starzl TE. Renal artery reconstruction for harvesting injuries in kidney transplantation with particular reference to the use of vascular allografts. Transpant Int 1988; 1: 80–85

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Van Cangh PJ, Alexandre GPJ. Ex vivo surgery on the renal allograft. Eur Urol 1975; 1: 111–113

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Vegeto A, Berardinelli L, Beretta C, Militano l. Outcome of renal grafts with multiple or damaged vessels. Proc Eur Dial Transpant Ass 1982; 19: 477–481

    Google Scholar 

  53. Vineyard GC, Tilney NL. An effective technique for management of transplant kidneys with polar branches. Arch Surg 1976; 111: 1407–1408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Wolters HH, Schult M, Heidenreich S, Chariat M, Senninger N, Dietl KH. The anastomosis between renal polar arteries and arteria epigastrica inferior in kidney transplantation: an option to decrease the risk of ureter necrosis? Transpl Int 2001; 14: 442–444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Woodruff MFA, Nolan B, Robson J, MacDonald MK. Renal transplantation in man. Experience with 35 cases. Lancet 1969: I: 6–9

    Google Scholar 

  56. Yussim A, Shapira Z, Shmueli D, Serradio C. Vascular problems and their management in retrieval of donor kidneys. Transplant Proc 1984; 16: 290–291

    Google Scholar 

Literatur zu Abschn. 5.5

  1. Benoit L, Spie R, Favoulet P, Cheynel N, Kretz B, Gouy S, Dubruille T, Fraisse J, Cuisenier J. Management of ureteral injuries. Ann Chir 2005; 130: 451–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Carlton CE, Scott R, Guthrie AG. The initial management of ureteral injuries. J Urol 1971; 105: 335–339

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Desai MM, Desai MR, Gill IS. Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology 2004; 64: 16–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gil-Vernet JM. Microscopic surgery in urology. World J Surg 1979; 3: 81–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hyams ES, Mufarrij PW, Stifelman MD. Robotic renal and upper tract reconstruction. Curr Opin Urol 2008; 18: 557–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jentsch H, Oesterwitz H, Wille A. Laparoskopische Harnleiterrekonstruktion nach iatrogener Verletzung. 5. Nordkongress Urologie, Rostock, Mai 2011

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kosse KH, Suarez EL, Fagan WT, Powell PR, Jacobson JH. Microsurgery in ureteral reconstruction. J Urol 1962; 87: 48–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kramer W, Jonas D. Die Mikrochirurgie des Nierenbeckens. Urologe A 1984; 23: 254–257

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Leveillee RJ, Williams SK. Role of robotics for ureteral pelvic junction obstruction and ureteral pathology. Curr Opin Urol 2009; 19: 81–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mufarrij PW, Shah OD, Berger AD, Stifelman MD. Robotic reconstruction of the upper urinary tract. J Urol 2007; 178: 2002–2005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oesterwitz H, Bick C, Müller P, Hengst E. Anwendung der Mikrochchirurgie bei der operativen Behandlung primärer Harnstauungsnieren. Z Urol Nephrol 1985; 78: 481–487

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Oesterwitz H, Bick C, Müller P, Hengst E, Seeger W. Management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction using a microsurgical technique. Eur Urol 1987; 13: 412–414

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Oesterwitz H, Bick C, Müller P, Hengst E. Reconstructive microsurgery of the upper urinary tract. Int Urol Nephrol 1988; 20: 453–459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Oesterwitz H, Metz L, Weber H. Microsurgical end-to-end anastomosis in ureteral injuries. Eur Urol 1988; 14: 251–252

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ponig BF. Microsurgical uretero-ureterostomy in ureteral injuries. J Urol 1982; 128: 594–595

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Roth DR, Gonzales ET. Management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants. J Urol 1983; 129: 108–111

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Literatur zu Abschn. 5.6

  1. Allon M, Lok CE. Dialysis fistula or graft: the role for randomized clinical trials. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010: 5: 2348–2354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Althaus P, Schönberger B, Stimmel F, Hansen C. Subkutane arteriovenöse Anastomosen zur Hämodialyse. Dtsch Gesundheitswesen 1979; 34: 139–142

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bourquelot P, Cussenot O, Corbi P. Microsurgical creation and follow-up of arteriovenous fistulae for chronic hemodialysis in children. Pediatr Nephrol 1990; 4: 156–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bourquelot P. Vascular access in children in children: the importance of microsurgery for creation of autologous arteriovenous fistulae. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006; 32: 696–700

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brescia MJ, Cimino JE, Appel K, Hurwich BJ. Chronic hemodialysis using venipuncture and a surgically created arterio-venous fistula. N Eng J Med 1966; 275: 1089–1092

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brittinger WD. Gefäßzugänge bei Dialysepatienten. Dialyse Journal 1984; 9: 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ethier J, Mendelssohn DC, Elder SJ, Hasegawa T, Akizawa T, Canaud BJ, Pisoni RL. Vascular access use and outcomes: an international perspective from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23: 3219–3226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fan PY, Schwab SJ. Vascular access: concepts for the 1990s. J Am Soc Nephrol 1992; 3: 1–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gallieni M, Saxena R, Davidson I. Dialysis access in Europe and North America: are we on the same path? Semin Intervent Radiol 2009; 26: 96–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Haimov M, Baez A, Neff M, Slifkin R. Complications of arterivenous fistulas for hemodialysis. Arch Surg 1975; 110: 708–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jennings WC. Creating arteriovenous fistulas in 132 consecutive patients. Arch Surg 2006; 141: 27–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Keller F, Loewe HJ, Bauknecht KJ, Schwarz A, Offermann G. Kumulative Funktionsraten von orthotopen Dialysefisteln und Interponaten. Dtsch Med Wschr 1988; 113: 332–336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kemkes BM. Gefäßersatz in der Dialyse-Shunt-Chirurgie. Dialyse Journal 1984; 9: 16–20

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nazzal HM, Neglen P, Naseem J, Christenson JT, Al-Hassan K. The brachiocephalic fistula: a successful secondary vascular access procedure. Vasa 1990; 19: 326–329

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Oesterwitz H, Link W, Schott H, Bischoff J. 10 Jahre Gefäßanschlüsse zur Hämodialyse im Klinikum Potsdam. Akt Urol 1993; 24: 77–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Oesterwitz H, Schott H, Bischoff J. Vascular access for hemodialysis–role of the urologist. Int Urol Nephrol 1995; 27: 117–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Oesterwitz H, Schott H, Bischoff J, Dietze B. Gefäßanschlüsse zur Hämodialyse. Beitrag der Urologie zum Aufschwung Ost in der Nierenersatztherapie. Urologe B 1996; 36: 108–112

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sanabia J, Polo JR, Morales MD, Canals MJ, Polo J, Serantes A. Microsurgery in gaining pediatric vascular access for hemodialysis. Microsurgery 1993; 14: 276–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Saran R, Elder SJ, Goodkin DA. Enhanced training in vascular access creation predicts arteriovenous fistula placement and patency in hemodialysis patients: results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. Kidney Int 2003; 63: 885–891

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scholz H, Naundorf M, Wolff W, Precht K, Röseler BD, Schulze B, Nieter G, Matthes G. Einflüsse auf die Funktionsdauer arterio-venöser Gefäßschlüsse für die Hämodialyse. Z Urol Nephrol 1988; 81: 629–633

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Widera R, Achenbach H, Hausmann F. Die arterio-venöse Fistel in der Tabatiere–der Primärshunt zur chronischen Hämodialyse. Z Urol Nephrol 1988; 81: 107–110

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Windus DW. Permanent vascular access: a nephrologist’s view. Am J Kidney Dis 1993; 21: 457–471

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zibari GB, Rohr MS, Landreneau LD, Bridges GA, De Vault FH, Petty KJ, Costley ST, Brown JC. Complications from permanent hemodialysis vascular access. Surgery 1988; 104: 681–686

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Urologie, Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, Potsdam, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Horst Oesterwitz

  2. Klinik für Plastische, Ästhetische und Rekonstruktive Mikrochirurgie, Handchirurgie, Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, Potsdam, Deutschland

    Dr. Mojtaba Ghods & Dr. Menedimos Geomelas

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Horst Oesterwitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. Mojtaba Ghods
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dr. Menedimos Geomelas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Horst Oesterwitz .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oesterwitz, H., Ghods, M., Geomelas, M. (2014). Rekonstruktive Mikrochirurgie in der Urologie. In: Praktische Mikrochirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41313-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41313-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41312-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41313-1

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation