Skip to main content

Pathology of Benign Breast Lesions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Benign Breast Diseases

Abstract

Nonoperative diagnostic procedures such as needle core biopsy or fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) are essential for appropriate decision-making in the management of the patient with benign or malignant breast disease. A conclusive radiological and histological diagnosis of benign breast disease allays anxiety in the woman concerned, especially if this can be achieved without surgical operation. Inadequate sampling from fibrotic lesions, such as lobular carcinoma, hyalinised fibroadenomas and scattered microcalcification, now limits the use of FNAC, which was once a popular diagnostic modality. Consequently more and more units are using stereotactic needle core biopsies in combination or as an adjunct to FNAC as a diagnostic tool. Needle core biopsies benefit from a higher sensitivity and specificity than FNAC (Britton 1999). More sections can be cut, and immunocytochemistry stains carried out on a needle core biopsy which may assist in reaching a diagnosis in equivocal cases. Needle core biopsies are also preferred to localise excision biopsies as they potentially spare patients with benign lesions from unnecessary surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acheson MB, Patton RG, Howisey RC, Lane RF, Morgan A, Rowbotham RK (2002) Three-to six-year follow up for 379 benign image-guided large-core biopsies of nonpalpable breast abnormalities. J Am Coll Surg 195:462–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Acs G, Lawton TJ, Rebbeck TR et al (2001) Differentiated expression of E-cadherin in lobular and ductal neoplasms of the breast and its biologic and diagnostic implications. Am J Clin Pathol 115:85–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bagnall MJ, Evans AJ, Wilson AR et al (2000) When have mammographic calcifications been adequately sampled at needle core biopsy. Clin Radiol 55:548–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berg WA, Hruban RH, Kumar D et al (1996) Lessons from mammographic–histopathologic correlation of large-core needle breast biopsy. Radiographics 16:1111–1130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner RJ, Fajardo L, Fisher PR et al (1996) Percutaneous core biopsy of the breast: effect of operator experience and number of samples on diagnostic accuracy. Am J Roentgenol 166:341–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Britton P (1999) Fine needle aspiration or core biopsy. Breast 8:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burbank F (1997) Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 202:843–847

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett SJD, Ng YY, Perry NM et al (1995) Benign biopsies in the prevalent round of breast screening – a review of 137 cases. Clin Radiol 50:254–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carder PJ, Liston JC (2003) Will the spectrum of lesions prompting a “B3” breast core biopsy increase the benign biopsy rate. J Clin Pathol 56:133–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darling ML, Smith DN, Lester SC et al (2000) Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision. Am J Roentgenol 175:1341–1346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ely KA, Carter BA, Jensen RA et al (2001) Core biopsy of the breast with atypical ductal hyperplasia: a probabilistic approach to reporting. Am J Surg Pathol 25:1017–1021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey JM, Sterrett GF, Frost FA (2002) Atypical ductal hyperplasia and atypia of uncertain significance in core biopsies from mammographically detected lesions: correlation with excision diagnosis. Pathology 34:410–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J et al (1999) Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesion: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 210:799–805

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Makunura CN, Curling OM, Yeomans P et al (1994) Apocrine adenosis within a radial scar: a case of false positive breast cytodiagnosis. Cytopathol 5:123–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC et al (1999) Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. JAMA 281:1638–1641

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NHSBSP (1993) Publication no 22. Guidelines for cytology procedures and reporting in breast cancer screening. NHS cancer screening programmes sheffield, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • NHSBSP (2001) Publications no 50. Guidelines for nonoperative diagnostic procedures and reporting in breast cancer screening. NHS cancer screening programmes sheffield, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen BB (1987) Adenosis tumour of the breast – a clinicopathological investigation of 27 cases. Histopathology 11:1259–1275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Otterbach F, Bànkfalví A, Bergner S et al (2000) Cytokeratin 5/6 immunohistochemistry assists the differential diagnosis of atypical proliferations of the breast. Histopathology 37:232–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Owings DV, Hann L, Schnitt SJ (1990) How thoroughly should needle localization breast biopsies be sampled for microscopic examination– a prospective mammographic/pathologic correlative study. Am J Surg Pathol 14:578–583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perry NM, on behalf of the EUSOMA working party (2001) Quality assurance in the diagnosis of breast disease. Eur J Cancer 37:159–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw AA (2001) Adequate histologic sampling of breast core needle biopsies. Arch Pathol Lab Med 125:1055–1057

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schnitt SJ, Wang HH (1989) Histologic sampling of grossly benign breast biopsies: how much is enough. Am J Surg Pathol 13:505–512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sneige N, Lim SC, Whitman GJ et al (2003) Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosis by directional vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy of breast microcalcifications. Consideration for surgical excision. Am J Clin Pathol 119:248–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer NJ, Evans AJ, Galea M et al (1994) Pathological–radiological correlations in benign lesions excised during a breast screening programme. Clin Radiol 49:853–856

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verschuur-Maes AHJ, Van Weurzen CHM, Momminkhof EM (2012) Columnar cell lesions on breast needle biopsies: is surgical excision necessary? A systemic review. In: Columnar cell lesions of the breast: clinical significance and molecular background. Verschuur-Maes AJH, Utrecht University dissertation, pp 43–58. http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/dissertations/2012-0103-200354/UUindex.html

  • White RR, Halperin TJ, Olson JA Jr et al (2001) Impact of core–needle breast biopsy on the surgical management of mammographic abnormalities. Ann Surg 233:769–777

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chinyama, C.N. (2014). Pathology of Benign Breast Lesions. In: Benign Breast Diseases. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41065-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41065-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41064-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41065-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics