Abstract
Nonoperative diagnostic procedures such as needle core biopsy or fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) are essential for appropriate decision-making in the management of the patient with benign or malignant breast disease. A conclusive radiological and histological diagnosis of benign breast disease allays anxiety in the woman concerned, especially if this can be achieved without surgical operation. Inadequate sampling from fibrotic lesions, such as lobular carcinoma, hyalinised fibroadenomas and scattered microcalcification, now limits the use of FNAC, which was once a popular diagnostic modality. Consequently more and more units are using stereotactic needle core biopsies in combination or as an adjunct to FNAC as a diagnostic tool. Needle core biopsies benefit from a higher sensitivity and specificity than FNAC (Britton 1999). More sections can be cut, and immunocytochemistry stains carried out on a needle core biopsy which may assist in reaching a diagnosis in equivocal cases. Needle core biopsies are also preferred to localise excision biopsies as they potentially spare patients with benign lesions from unnecessary surgery.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acheson MB, Patton RG, Howisey RC, Lane RF, Morgan A, Rowbotham RK (2002) Three-to six-year follow up for 379 benign image-guided large-core biopsies of nonpalpable breast abnormalities. J Am Coll Surg 195:462–466
Acs G, Lawton TJ, Rebbeck TR et al (2001) Differentiated expression of E-cadherin in lobular and ductal neoplasms of the breast and its biologic and diagnostic implications. Am J Clin Pathol 115:85–98
Bagnall MJ, Evans AJ, Wilson AR et al (2000) When have mammographic calcifications been adequately sampled at needle core biopsy. Clin Radiol 55:548–553
Berg WA, Hruban RH, Kumar D et al (1996) Lessons from mammographic–histopathologic correlation of large-core needle breast biopsy. Radiographics 16:1111–1130
Brenner RJ, Fajardo L, Fisher PR et al (1996) Percutaneous core biopsy of the breast: effect of operator experience and number of samples on diagnostic accuracy. Am J Roentgenol 166:341–346
Britton P (1999) Fine needle aspiration or core biopsy. Breast 8:1–4
Burbank F (1997) Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 202:843–847
Burnett SJD, Ng YY, Perry NM et al (1995) Benign biopsies in the prevalent round of breast screening – a review of 137 cases. Clin Radiol 50:254–258
Carder PJ, Liston JC (2003) Will the spectrum of lesions prompting a “B3” breast core biopsy increase the benign biopsy rate. J Clin Pathol 56:133–138
Darling ML, Smith DN, Lester SC et al (2000) Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision. Am J Roentgenol 175:1341–1346
Ely KA, Carter BA, Jensen RA et al (2001) Core biopsy of the breast with atypical ductal hyperplasia: a probabilistic approach to reporting. Am J Surg Pathol 25:1017–1021
Harvey JM, Sterrett GF, Frost FA (2002) Atypical ductal hyperplasia and atypia of uncertain significance in core biopsies from mammographically detected lesions: correlation with excision diagnosis. Pathology 34:410–416
Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J et al (1999) Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesion: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 210:799–805
Makunura CN, Curling OM, Yeomans P et al (1994) Apocrine adenosis within a radial scar: a case of false positive breast cytodiagnosis. Cytopathol 5:123–128
Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC et al (1999) Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. JAMA 281:1638–1641
NHSBSP (1993) Publication no 22. Guidelines for cytology procedures and reporting in breast cancer screening. NHS cancer screening programmes sheffield, UK
NHSBSP (2001) Publications no 50. Guidelines for nonoperative diagnostic procedures and reporting in breast cancer screening. NHS cancer screening programmes sheffield, UK
Nielsen BB (1987) Adenosis tumour of the breast – a clinicopathological investigation of 27 cases. Histopathology 11:1259–1275
Otterbach F, Bànkfalví A, Bergner S et al (2000) Cytokeratin 5/6 immunohistochemistry assists the differential diagnosis of atypical proliferations of the breast. Histopathology 37:232–240
Owings DV, Hann L, Schnitt SJ (1990) How thoroughly should needle localization breast biopsies be sampled for microscopic examination– a prospective mammographic/pathologic correlative study. Am J Surg Pathol 14:578–583
Perry NM, on behalf of the EUSOMA working party (2001) Quality assurance in the diagnosis of breast disease. Eur J Cancer 37:159–172
Renshaw AA (2001) Adequate histologic sampling of breast core needle biopsies. Arch Pathol Lab Med 125:1055–1057
Schnitt SJ, Wang HH (1989) Histologic sampling of grossly benign breast biopsies: how much is enough. Am J Surg Pathol 13:505–512
Sneige N, Lim SC, Whitman GJ et al (2003) Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosis by directional vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy of breast microcalcifications. Consideration for surgical excision. Am J Clin Pathol 119:248–253
Spencer NJ, Evans AJ, Galea M et al (1994) Pathological–radiological correlations in benign lesions excised during a breast screening programme. Clin Radiol 49:853–856
Verschuur-Maes AHJ, Van Weurzen CHM, Momminkhof EM (2012) Columnar cell lesions on breast needle biopsies: is surgical excision necessary? A systemic review. In: Columnar cell lesions of the breast: clinical significance and molecular background. Verschuur-Maes AJH, Utrecht University dissertation, pp 43–58. http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/dissertations/2012-0103-200354/UUindex.html
White RR, Halperin TJ, Olson JA Jr et al (2001) Impact of core–needle breast biopsy on the surgical management of mammographic abnormalities. Ann Surg 233:769–777
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chinyama, C.N. (2014). Pathology of Benign Breast Lesions. In: Benign Breast Diseases. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41065-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41065-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41064-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41065-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)