Skip to main content

Risk Assessment in Benign Breast Lesions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Benign Breast Diseases

Abstract

Benign breast lesions can present symptomatically or mammographically detected through screening programmes. Risk assessment is important for both the clinician and the patient to assist in making decisions regarding screening, prophylactic treatment and surveillance. Because of widespread use of mammography, clinically silent benign lesions are now easily detected, leading to pathological assessment to exclude the presence of malignancy. Fine needle aspiration cytology, needle core biopsies and excision biopsies are the methods used to confirm benignity and allay patient anxiety. When a woman has had a diagnosis of benign breast disease, more often than not she wishes to know what is the likelihood of the benign lesion predisposing to cancer at a later stage. With some conditions, such as fat necrosis, duct ectasia or hyalinised fibroadenoma, the clinician can reassure the patient confidently that there is no risk of developing cancer. However, some benign proliferative lesions confer an increased risk of subsequent malignancy, although in most cases the risk is very small. These conditions require careful explanation to the patient, not to alarm them but to encourage compliance with follow-up. The advantage of assessing the possible risk of progressing to malignancy in benign disease is that regular clinical and radiological follow-up can detect malignancy at an early, potentially curable stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amir E, Evans DG, Shenton A et al (2003) Evaluation of breast cancer risk assessment packages in the family history evaluation and screening programme. J Med Genet 40:807–814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amir E, Freedman OC, Seruza B et al (2010) Assessing women at high risk of breast cancer: a review of risk assessment models (review). J Natl Cancer Inst 102:680–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Antoniou AC, Pharoah PP, Smith P et al (2004) The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 91:1580–1590

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur JE, Ellis IO, Flowers C, Roebuck E, Elston CW, Blamey RW (1990) The relationship of “high risk” mammographic patterns to histological risk factors for development of cancer in the human breast. Br J Radiol 63:845–849

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck JJ (1998) Risk revisited. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 26:220–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beral V, Million Women Study Collaborators (2003) Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the Million Women Study. Lancet 362:419–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo JM Bayesian statistics. www.uv.es/bernado/BayesStat.pdf

  • Bodian CA, Perzin KH, Lattes R et al (1993) Prognostic significance of benign proliferative disease. Cancer 71:3896–3907

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boughey JC, Hartmann LC, Anderson S et al (2010) Evaluation of the Tyrer-Cuzick (International Breast Cancer Interactive Study) model for breast cancer risk prediction in women with atypical hyperplasia. J Clin Oncol 28:3591–3596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boulos FI, Dupont WA, Simpson JF et al (2008) Histologic association and long-term cancer risk in columnar cell lesions of the breast: a retrospective cohort and nested case-control study. Cancer 113:2415–2421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd NF, Jensen HM, Cooke G, Han HL, Lockwood GA, Miller AB (2000) Mammographic densities and the prevalence and incidence of histological types of benign breast disease. Reference Pathologists of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Eur J Cancer Prev 9:15–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burt BA Definitions of risk. www.nider.nih.gov/NR/rdonyltes/59E8463F/Brian_Burt_Risk.pdf

  • Business Dictionary. What is risk? Definition and meaning. www.businessdictionary.com/definition/risk/html

  • Byrne C, Schairer C, Brinton LA et al (2001) Effects of mammographic density and benign breast disease on breast cancer risk (United States). Cancer Cause Control 12:103–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carter BA, Page DL, Schuyler P et al (2001) No elevation in long-term breast carcinoma risk for women with fibroadenomas that contain atypical hyperplasia. Cancer 92:30–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chuba PJ, Hamre MR, Yap J et al (2005) Bilateral risk for subsequent breast cancer after lobular carcinoma in-situ: analysis of surveillance, epidemiology and end result data. J Clin Oncol 23:5534–5541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Claus EB, Risch N, Thompson WD (1991) Genetic analysis of breast cancer and steroid hormone study. Am J Hum Genet 48:232–242

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Claus EB, Risch N, Thompson WD (1993) The calculation of breast cancer risk for women with a first-degree family history of ovarian cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 28:115–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Claus EB, Schildkraut JM, Thompson WD et al (1996) The genetic attributable risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer 77:2318–2324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cole P, Elwood JM, Kaplan SD (1978) Incidence rates and risk factors of benign breast neoplasms. Am J Epidemiol 108:112–120

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Constantino JP, Gail MH, Pee D et al (1999) Validation studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1541–1548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coutelle C, Höhn B, Benesova M et al (2004) Risk factors in alcohol associated breast cancer: alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism and oestrogens. Int J Oncol 25:1127–1132

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cyrillic Software: BRCAPRO model. cyrillicsoftware.com/support/cy3bfca.htm

  • Dupont WD, Page DL (1985) Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. N Engl J Med 312:146–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont WD, Page DL (1989) Relative risk of breast cancer varies with time since diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia. Hum Pathol 20:723–725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont WD, Plummer WD (1996) Understanding the relationship between relative and absolute risk. Cancer 77:2193–2199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont WD, Page DL, Parl FF et al (1994) Long-term risk of breast cancer in women with fibroadenoma. N Engl J Med 331:10–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont WD, Page DL, Parl FF et al (1999) Estrogen replacement therapy in women with a history of proliferative breast disease. Cancer 85:1277–1283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ernster VL (1981) The epidemiology of benign breast disease. Epidemiol Rev 3:184–202

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans GD, Howell A (2007) Breast cancer risk assessment models (review). Breast Cancer Res 9:213. http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/9/5/213

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff B, Watson SR (1984) Defining risk. Pol Sci 17:123–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher B, Costantino P, Wickerham DL et al (1998) Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1371–1388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgibbons PL, Henson DE, Hutter RV for the Cancer Committee of the College of American Pathologists (1998) Benign breast changes and the risk for subsequent breast cancer. An update of consensus statement. Arch Pathol Lab Med 122:1053–1055

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming NT, Armstrong BK, Sheiner HJ (1982) The comparative epidemiology of benign breast lumps and breast cancer in Western Australia. Int J Cancer 30:147–152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M et al (1998) Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. Am J Hum Genet 62:676–689

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman AN, Seminora W, Gail MH (2005) Cancer risk prediction models: a workshop on development, evaluation and application. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:715–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friedenreich CM, Bryant HE, Alexander F, Hugh J, Danyluk J, Page DL (2000) Risk factors for benign proliferative breast disease. Int J Epidemiol 29:637–644

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gail MH, Mai PL (2010) Comparing breast cancer risk assessment models. J Nat Cancer Inst 102:665–668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP et al (1989) Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1879–1886

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gao F, Carter G, Tseng G et al (2010) Clinical importance of histologic grading of lobular carcinoma in-situ in breast core needle biopsy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 133:767–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gill HK, Ioffe OB, Berg WA (2003) When is the diagnosis of sclerosing adenosis acceptable on biopsy? Radiology 228:50–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hutter RVP et al (1986) Is “fibrocystic disease” of the breast precancerous. Arch Pathol Lab Med 110:171–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang ES, Nyante SJ, Chen YY et al (2004) Clonality of lobular carcinoma in-situ and synchronous invasive lobular carcinoma. Cancer 100:2562–2572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs TW, Bryne C, Colditz G, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ (1999) Radial scars in benign breast biopsy specimens and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 340:430–436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen RA, Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW (1989) Invasive breast cancer in women with sclerosing adenosis. Cancer 64:1977–1983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiluk JV, Acs G, Hoover SJ (2007) High-risk benign breast lesions: current strategies in management. Cancer Control 14:321–329

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lakhani SR, Audretsch W, Clenton-Jensen AM et al (2006) The management of lobular carcinoma in-situ (LCIS). Is LCIS the same as ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS)? Eur J Cancer 42:2205–2211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Last JM (2001) A dictionary of epidemiology, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis JT, Hartmann LC, Vierkant RA et al (2006) Analysis of breast cancer risk in women with single, multiple, and atypical papilloma. Am J Surg 30:665–672

    Google Scholar 

  • London SJ, Connolly JL, Schill SJ, Golditz GA (1992) A prospective study of benign breast disease and risk of breast cancer. JAMA 267:941–944

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Longnecker MP (1994) Alcoholic beverage consumption and risk of breast cancer: meta-analysis review. Cancer Causes Control 5:73–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Longnecker MP, Newcomb PA, Mittendorf R et al (1995) Risk of breast cancer in relation to lifetime alcohol consumption. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:923–929

    Google Scholar 

  • Love SM, Gelman RS, Silen W (1982) Fibrocystic “disease” of the breast – a nondisease. N Engl J Med 307:1010–1014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y-J, Osin P, Lakhani SR et al (1998) Comparative genomic hybridisation analysis of lobular carcinoma in-situ and atypical lobular hyperplasia and potential roles for gains and losses of genetic material in breast neoplasia. Cancer Res 58:4721–4727

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manson J, Martin K (2001) Post-menopausal hormone-replacement therapy. N Engl J Med 345:34–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Margenthaler JA, Duke W, Monsees BS et al (2006) Correlation between core biopsy and excisional biopsy in high risk lesions. Am J Surg 192:534–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall LM, Hunter DJ, Connolly JL et al (1997) Risk of breast cancer associated with atypical hyperplasia of lobular and ductal types. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 6:297–301

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDivitt RW, Stevens JA, Lee NC, Wingo PA, Rubin GL, Gersell D, The Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study Group (1992) Histologic types of benign breast disease and the risk for breast cancer. Cancer 69:1408–1414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mendell L, Rosenbloom M, Naimark A (1977) Are breast patterns a risk index for breast cancer– a reappraisal. Am J Roentgenol 128:547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz M, Gartside P, McLaughlin C (1980) Mammographic patterns as markers for high-risk benign breast disease and incident cancers. Radiology 134:293–295

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Cancer Institute website. http://bcra.nci.nih.gov/brc

  • NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms. Absolute risk. www.cancer.gov/dictionarycdrid=618613

  • NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms. Relative risk. www.cancer.gov/dictionarycdrid=618613

  • NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms. Risk factor. www.cancer.gov.dictionary/crid=45873

    Google Scholar 

  • NICE Clinical Guideline 164 (2013) Familial breast cancer: classification and care of people at risk of familial breast cancer and management of breast cancer and related risks in people with a family history of breast cancer guidance. nice.org.uk/cg164

  • O’Malley FP (2010) Lobular neoplasia: morphology, biological potential and management in core biopsies. Modern Pathol 23:514–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Dictionaries (British and World English). Definition of risk. http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/risk

  • Page DL (1986) Cancer risk assessment in benign breast biopsies. Hum Pathol 17:871–874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Page DL, Dupont WD (1990) Anatomic markers of human premalignancy and risk of breast cancer. Cancer 66:1326–1335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Page DL, Vander Zwaag R, Rogers LW, Williams LT, Walker WE, Hartmann WH (1978) Relation between component parts of fibrocystic disease complex and breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 61:1055–1063

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, Rados MS (1985) Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast. A long-term follow-up study. Cancer 55:2698–2708

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Page DL, Kidd TE, Dupont WD et al (1991) Lobular neoplasia of the breast: higher risk for subsequent invasive cancer predicted by more extensive disease. Hum Pathol 22:1232–1239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Page DL, Salhany KE, Jensen RA, Dupont WD (1996) Subsequent breast carcinoma risk after biopsy with atypia in a breast papilloma. Cancer 78:258–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Page DL, Schuyler PA, Dupont WD et al (2003) Atypical lobular hyperplasia is a unilateral predictor of breast cancer risk: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 361:125–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palli D, Del Turco MR, Simoncini R et al (1991) Benign breast disease and breast cancer: case–control study in a cohort in Italy. Int J Cancer 47:703–706

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pankiratz VS, Hartmann LC, Degnim AC et al (2008) Assessment of the accuracy of the Gail model in women with atypical hyperplasia. J Clin Oncol 26:5374–5379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmagiani G, Berry DA, Aguilar O (1996) Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer – susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. Am J Hum Genet 62:145–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis-Filho JS, Pinder SE (2007) Non-operative breast pathology: lobular neoplasia. J Clin Pathol 60:1321–1327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg L, Metzger LS, Palmer JR (1993) Alcohol consumption and risk of breast cancer: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. Epidomiol Rev 15:133–144

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rossow JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL et al Writing Group for the Women’s Health Initiative Investigators (2002) Risks and benefits of oestrogen plus progestin in healthy post-menopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288:321–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Saftlas AF, Hoover RN, Brinton LA et al (1991) Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer. Cancer 67:2833–2838

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders ME, Page DL, Simpson JF et al (2006) Interdependence of radial scars and proliferative disease with respect to invasive breast carcinoma risk in patients with benign breast biopsies. Cancer 106:1453–1461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaaban AM, Sloane JP, West CR et al (2002) Histopathologic types of benign breast lesions and the risk of breast cancer. Case–control study. Am J Surg Pathol 26:421–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sklair-Levy M, Sella T, Alweiss T et al (2008) Incidence and management of complex hyperplasia. Am J Radiol 190:214–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Warner SA, Spiegelman D, Shiaw-Shynan Y et al (1998) Alcohol and breast cancer in women. A pooled analysis of cohort studies. JAMA 279:535–540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sterns EE, Zee B (2000) Mammographic density changes in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: is effect of hormone replacement therapy predictable? Cancer Res Treat 59:125–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Struewing JP, Hartge P, Wacholder S et al (1997) The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews. N Engl J Med 336:1401–1408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tice JA, Cummings SR, Zive E et al (2006) Mammographic breast density and the Gail model for breast cancer risk prediction in a screening population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 95:115–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyrer J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J (2004) A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors. Stat Med 23:1111–1130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vachon CM, Cerhan JR, Vierhaut RA et al (2001) Investigation of an interaction of alcohol intake and family history of breast cancer in the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study. Cancer 92:240–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verschuur-Maes AH, Witkamp AJ, De Bruin PC et al (2011) Progression risk of columnar cell lesions of the breast diagnosed in needle core biopsies. Int J Cancer 129:2674–2680

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel VG, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL et al (2010) Update of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2: preventing breast cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 3:696–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Constantino JP, Tan-Chie E et al (2004) Lower category benign breast disease and risk of invasive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:616–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wellings SR, Wolfe JN (1978) Correlative studies of the histological and radiographic appearances of the breast parenchyma. Radiology 129:299–306

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe JN (1976a) Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 126:1130–1139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe JN (1976b) Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern. Cancer 37:2486–2492

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe JN (1976c) Breast parenchymal patterns and their changes with age. Radiology 121:545–552

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe JN, Saftlas AF, Salane M (1987) Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case–control study. Am J Roentgenol 148:1087–1092

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright RM, McManaman JL, Repine JE (1999) Alcohol-induced breast cancer: a proposed mechanism. Free Radical Bio Med 26:348–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chinyama, C.N. (2014). Risk Assessment in Benign Breast Lesions. In: Benign Breast Diseases. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41065-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41065-9_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41064-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41065-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics