Skip to main content

Coca in Debate: The Contradiction and Conflict Between the UN Drug Conventions and the Real World

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Prohibition, Religious Freedom, and Human Rights: Regulating Traditional Drug Use

Abstract

The traditional use of coca leaf is surrounded by contradictions in terms of the control mechanisms of the international drug conventions. The 1961 Convention establishes the leaf as a controlled substance in the body of its articles and in its schedules of dangerous drugs, and the 1988 Convention establishes its traditional use as permitted “where historical evidence exists.” The use of the leaf is present in a variety of contexts around the world, but mainly in the Andean Amazon region. This chapter will tell the on-going story of the long road toward international acceptance of the tradition of chewing coca leaf, which is paved with confusion, contradictions, and cultural richness. Several countries in South America have a legal base that allows for traditional use; still the international drug treaties do not recognize these, and attempts for change are blamed to “threated the integrity of the global drug control system.” This chapter tells the story of how the coca plant and its traditional uses have reached the status of public enemy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Bahamas, Bolivia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Guatemala, India, Jamaica, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, and Peru.

  2. 2.

    Much of the material produced can be consulted at: http://www.tni.org/article/who-cocaine-project.

  3. 3.

    See for a more detailed discussion on the contradictions around the legal UN framework on human and indigenous rights, see Boiteux et al. (in this volume).

  4. 4.

    See Cortés (2012).

  5. 5.

    From the INCB (2011), p. 92.

  6. 6.

    Mortimer (1901).

References

  • Abduca, R. (2010). Acerca del concepto de valor de uso: Signo, consumo y subjetividad. La hoja de coca en la Argentina (Doctoral dissertation). University of Buenos Aires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, D. (2011). Bolivia’s concurrent drug control and other international legal commitments. Backgrounder, International Centre on Human Rights and Drug Policy (ICHRDC). United Kingdom: ICHRDC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bewley-Taylor, B., & Jelsma, M. (2012). Regime change: Re-visiting the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. International Journal on Drug Policy, 23(1), 72–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boiteux, L., Chernicharo, L. P., & Alves, C. S. (2014). Human rights and drug conventions: Searching for humanitarian reason in drug laws (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortés, R. (2012, December 4). A secret history of coffee, coca & cola. New York, NY: Akashic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic and Social Council. (1950). Report of the Commission of Enquiry on the Coca Leaf. Official records, 5th year, 12th session: Special supplement, 1 (E/1666-E/CN.7/AC.2/1).

    Google Scholar 

  • El Comercio. (1949). Entrevista con el jefe de la Delegacion de las NNUU (Interview with the head of the delegation of the United Nations Commission of investigation into the Coca Leaf). Lima, Peru: Howard P. Fonda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagliano, J. A. (1994). Coca prohibition in Peru: The historical debates. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Colombia. (1994, June 10). Official Declaration upon Ratification of 1988 Convention against Trafficking of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. Consulted at http://www.treaties.un.org.

  • Government of Peru. (1988, December). Official Reservation upon signature of 1988 Convention against Trafficking of Narcotic Drugs and Psychoactive Substances. Consulted at http://www.treaties.un.org.

  • Henman, A., & Metaal, P. (2009). Coca myths. Drugs and Conflict, Debate Papers, 17. The Netherlands: Transnational Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado-Gumucio, J. (2000). Coca leaf chewing as therapy for cocaine maintenance. Annales de Médecine Interne (Paris), 151(Suppl. B), B44–B48.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Narcotics Control Board. (1992, 1993, 1994). International Narcotics Control Board Annual Reports. New York, NY: INCB.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Narcotics Control Board. (1994a). Evaluation of the effectiveness of the international drug control treaties. New York, NY: INCB.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Narcotics Control Board. (1994b). Suppl.1: Supplement to the INCB Report for 1994. New York, NY: INCB.

    Google Scholar 

  • INEI-DEVIDA. (2004). Encuesta Nacional sobre consumo tradicional de la hoja de coca en los hogares.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Narcotics Control Board. (2011). Estimated world requirements for 2012: Statistics for 2010 and the comment on estimated world requirements of controlled substances (p. 92). New York, NY: INCB.

    Google Scholar 

  • INCB. (2012) INCB Annual report 2011. Foreword by INCB President Hamid Godshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llosa, T. (1994). The standard low dose of oral cocaine used for treatment of cocaine dependence. Substance Abuse, 15(4), 215–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariani, J. J., & Levin, F. R. (2012). Psycho-stimulant treatment of cocaine dependence. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 35(2), 425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metaal, P., Jelsma, M., Argandoña, M., Soberon, R., Henman, A., & Ecchevería, X. (2006). Coca yes, cocaine, no? Legal options for the coca leaf. Debate Papers, Drugs and Conflict, 13. The Netherlands: Transnational Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, W. G. (1901). History of coca: The divine plant of the Incas. New York, NY: J. H. Vail & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plurinational State of Bolivia. (2009). Constitución Política del Estado de Bolivia de 2009. Sucre, Bolivia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plurinational State of Bolivia. (2010). Aide-Memoir on the Bolivian proposal to amend Article 49 of the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961. La Paz, Bolivia: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokatlían, J. G. (2009). La Guerra contra las Drogas en el mundo Andino, hacia un cambio de paradigma. Buenos Aires: Libros de Zorzal.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nation. (1957, April–May). Report of the Commission of Narcotic Drugs, 12th Session, New York. Minister Dr. J. Haaker addressing the Commission on the question of the Coca Leaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1961). Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. New York, NY: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1973). United Nations conference for the adoption of a protocol on psychotropic substances, Vienna, January 11–February 19, 1971. Official records, Volume 2: Summary records of plenary meetings, Minutes of the meetings of the General Committee and the Committee on Control Measures. New York, NY: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1988a). Commentary on the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. New York, NY: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1988b). Convention on United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. New York, NY: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1988c, November 25–December 20). Official records of the United Nations Conference for the Adoption of a Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Vols. 1 and 2). Vienna: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1988, revised 2013). Treaty collection, Chapter 6: Narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. Vienna: United Nations. Retrieved from http://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=VI-19&chapter=6&lang=en#EndDec.

  • United Nations. (2007). Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. New York, NY: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. (2009, May 18–29). Report of the Eighth Session of the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues; UNDoc No E/2009/43-E/C.19/2009/14.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. (2010, April 19–30). Report of the Ninth Session of the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues; UN Doc No: E/2010/43-E/C.19/2010/15.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2012). Depository Notification on 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs (C.N.829, 2012, TREATIES-28) from Plurinational State of Bolivia. NY: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, A. (1981). The therapeutic value of coca in contemporary medicine. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 3, 367–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windsant, C.V. (2007). The real thing: History of Mariani wine. Unpublished article.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Assembly. (1995). Forty-Eight Health Assembly: Summary Records and Reports of Committee. Geneva, WHA48/ 1995/REC/3. Geneva: World Health Assembly.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1952). Expert Committee on Drugs Liable to produce Addiction: Second Session. Technical Report Series, 55. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1954). Expert Committee on Drugs Liable to produce Addiction: Third Session. Technical Report Series 76. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1993). Expert Committee on Drug Dependence: Twenty-Eighth Session. Technical Report Series 836. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pien Metaal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Metaal, P. (2014). Coca in Debate: The Contradiction and Conflict Between the UN Drug Conventions and the Real World. In: Labate, B., Cavnar, C. (eds) Prohibition, Religious Freedom, and Human Rights: Regulating Traditional Drug Use. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40957-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics