Skip to main content

The Dilemma of Assessment in the US

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Survival of the Fittest

Part of the book series: New Frontiers of Educational Research ((NFER))

Abstract

Assessment is the evaluation of student learning in specific learning outcomes such as integrative thinking, writing, civic engagement, or appreciation of diversity. When conducted well, it produces evidence of learning that should lead to improvements in pedagogy and curriculum. But many educators at American colleges and universities remain suspicious or fearful of assessment. This fear or suspicion of a function so obviously linked to the purpose of education is rooted in the tension between different purposes to which assessment evidence can be put: Assessment can be used positively to encourage thoughtful reflection on pedagogical practice, or negatively to threaten “underperforming” teachers and institutions. This is the dilemma of assessment in American higher education. However, a number of developments in higher education over the past few decades—online learning, the problem of transfer credits, discontent with the credit hour—have their own dilemmas that only quality assessment can address. Assessment is a critical component in moving higher education out of the regimented industrial age into the personalized, flexible learning of the post-industrial twenty-first century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Archibald RB, Feldman DH (2010) Why does college cost so much?. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arum R, Roksa J (2011) Academically adrift: limited learning on college campuses. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Banta TW, Blaich C (2011) Closing the assessment loop. Change 43(1):22–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (2012) Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching receives funding to rethink the Carnegie Unit. Press Release. http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/newsroom/press-releases/carnegie-foundation-receives-funding-rethink-the-carnegie-unit

  • Engell J, Dangerfield A (2005) Saving higher education in the age of money. University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Fain P (2012). A disruption grows up? Inside Higher Ed. http://newamerica.net/node/72069

  • Field K (2011) Spellings panel spurred progress in some key areas but failed to remake American higher education. Chronicle of Higher Education. http://chronicle.com/article/5-Years-Later-the-Impact-of/129053/

  • Kentucky House Bill 160 (2010) Regular session. http://cpe.ky.gov/NR/rdonlyres/EEBAC1CA-976D-4D41-A5F3-EA61B10127D6/0/HB160.pdf

  • Kerouac P, O’Hara A (2012) Beginning with the end in mind: mapping student learning outcomes to general education. Paper presented at AAC&U general education and assessment: new contexts, new cultures, New Orleans, Louisiana, 24 February 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Kezar A (2013) Grassroots Leadership: Responding to Declining Shared Governance in the Neoliberal World

    Google Scholar 

  • Laitinen A (2012) Cracking the credit hour. New America Foundation. http://newamerica.net/publications/policy/cracking_the_credit_hour

  • Liu OL, Bridgeman B, Adler RM (2012) Measuring learning outcomes in higher education: motivation matters. Educ Res 41(9):352

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick AC (2003) Swirling and double-dipping: new patterns of student attendance and their implications for higher education. New Dir Higher Educ 121:13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC) (2011) Standards for accreditation effective July 1, 2011. http://cihe.neasc.org/standards_policies/standards/standards_html_version#standard_four

  • No Child Left Behind (NCLB) (2002) Act of 2001. Pub. L. No. 107–110, § 115, Stat. 1425

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepin C, Miller M (2012) Translating national benchmarks into local practice (and back again): implementing integrative assessment at Champlain College. Paper presented at AAC&U general education and assessment: new contexts, new cultures, New Orleans, Louisiana, 24 February 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes T (ed) (2010) Assessing outcomes and improving achievement: tips and tools for using rubrics. Association of American Colleges and Universities, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson R (2010) Measuring college learning responsibly: accountability in a new era. Staford University Press, Redwood City, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Commission on Colleges (2012) Principles of accreditation: foundations for quality enhancement, 5th edn. http://www.sacscoc.org/pdf/2012PrinciplesOfAcreditation.pdf. Accessed December 2011

  • Suskie L (2009) Assessing student learning: a common sense guide, 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Toma JD (2007) Expanding peripheral activities, increasing accountability demands and reconsidering governance in US higher education. Higher Educ Res Dev 26:57–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Education (2006) A test of leadership: charting the future of American higher education (Report of the commission appointed by Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings). Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidovich L, Currie J (2011) Governance and trust in higher education. Stud Higher Educ 36(1):43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Craig K. Pepin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pepin, C.K. (2014). The Dilemma of Assessment in the US. In: Li, Q., Gerstl-Pepin, C. (eds) Survival of the Fittest. New Frontiers of Educational Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39813-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39813-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39812-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39813-1

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics