Skip to main content

Detection of Inconsistencies in Rules Due to Changes in Ontologies: Let’s Get Formal

  • Conference paper
Web Reasoning and Rule Systems (RR 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7994))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 793 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the impact of ontology changes on production rules, in the context of rule programs written over the entities of OWL ontologies. Then, ontology evolutions may make rules inconsistent with respect to the knowledge modeled by the ontology. To address this problem, we propose to combine two approaches: the syntactic approach of the \(\mathcal{M}{\rm odel}\)-\(\mathcal{D}{\rm etect}\)-\(\mathcal{R}{\rm epair}\) (\({\mathcal{MDR}}\)) method, and a semantic approach based on a formal description of production rules and rule program inconsistencies. The present paper shows on simple use cases the expected benefits of such a combination, which relies on existing implementations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antoniou, G., Damásio, C.V., Grosof, B., Horrocks, I., Kifer, M., Maluszynski, J., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: Combining rules and ontologies: a survey. Technical Report IST506779/Linköping/I3-D3/D/PU/a1, Linköping University (2005), http://rewerse.net/publications/rewerse-description/REWERSE-DEL-2005-I3-D3.html

  2. Berstel, B., Leconte, M.: Using constraints to verify properties of rule programs. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Third International Conference on Software Testing, Verification, and Validation Workshops, ICSTW 2010, pp. 349–354. IEEE Computer Society (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berstel-Da Silva, B.: Formalizing both refraction-based and sequential executions of production rule programs. In: Bikakis, A., Giurca, A. (eds.) RuleML 2012. LNCS, vol. 7438, pp. 47–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Berstel-Da Silva, B.: Verification of business rules programs. Ph.D. thesis, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany (2012), http://www.freidok.uni-freiburg.de/volltexte/8799/

  5. Chniti, A., Albert, P., Charlet, J.: A loose coupling approach for combining OWL ontologies and business rules. In: RuleML 2012@ECAI Challenge, at the 6th International Symposium on Rules Research Based and Industry Focused 2012. CEUR Workshop proceedings, vol. 874, pp. 103–110 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chniti, A., Albert, P., Charlet, J.: MDROntology: An ontology for managing ontology changes impacts on business rules. In: Joint Workshop on Knowledge Evolution and Ontology Dynamics 2012. In conjunction with International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2012). CEUR Workshop proceedings (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chniti, A., Boussadi, A., Degoulet, P., Albert, P., Charlet, J.: Pharmaceutical validation of medication orders using an OWL ontology and business rules. In: Joint Workshop on Semantic Technologies Applied to Biomedical Informatics and Individualized Medicine (SATBI+SWIM 2012). In conjunction with International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2012. CEUR Workshop proceedings (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Djedidi, R., Aufaure, M.-A.: ONTO-EVO A L an ontology evolution approach guided by pattern modeling and quality evaluation. In: Link, S., Prade, H. (eds.) FoIKS 2010. LNCS, vol. 5956, pp. 286–305. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. IBM. VISA Europe: Processing payments with unprecedented agility and reliability (2011), http://www.ibm.com/software/success/cssdb.nsf/CS/SSAO-8FNJEB .

  10. IBM. IBMJRules v8.0 User’s Manual (2012), http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/dmanager/v8r0/

  11. Ontorule Project. Ontologies meet Business Rules (2012), http://ontorule-project.eu

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Berstel-Da Silva, B., Chniti, A. (2013). Detection of Inconsistencies in Rules Due to Changes in Ontologies: Let’s Get Formal. In: Faber, W., Lembo, D. (eds) Web Reasoning and Rule Systems. RR 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7994. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39666-3_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39666-3_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39665-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39666-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics