Skip to main content

Neuroendoscopic Management of Intraparenchymal Lesions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neuroendoscopy

Abstract

The ability of endoscopes to drive illumination and vision into the area of interest has led to the possibility of working into body cavities through reduced access. In this way, managing lesions inside solid tissues obligates the creation of a working space – just a trajectory where light, vision, and surgical tools come into the working site. The direction and the small diameter of this corridor are critical to minimize brain damage.

The concept of a keyhole craniotomy combined with a selected trajectory can enable the approach of intraparenchymal lesions. However, the decision to use endoscopy must be individualized based on the patient, site, and characteristics of the lesion.

We routinely use neuroendoscopy, assisted by neuronavigation and at times ultrasound, to remove intraparenchymal brain lesions. The approach is planned, determining an ideal entry point and a straight trajectory to the target. Fiber tracking can be very helpful in order to avoid important projection fibers along the trajectory.

A 1.2 cm trepanation is performed, which can be extended to an elliptical shape in order to facilitate some lateral movement of the sheath and endoscope. A purpose-designed sheath with its internal obturator is then introduced progressively into the brain parenchyma, with or without the orientation of a neuronavigation system, depending on each case. Once in position, the obturator is removed and the endoscope is introduced to confirm the correct position. In most cases clear differentiation of normal and pathological tissue interface can be observed.

Resection is then performed introducing instruments through the sheath, in parallel to the endoscope. Multiple instruments can be used alone or in combination (suction tubes, tumor forceps, microscissors, monopolar or bipolar coagulation) in order to perform resection of the lesion. Partial or total removal of the lesion may be achieved, depending on its nature and the proposed objectives. Once the intended resection is completed, the sheath is removed progressively with constant endoscopic visualization so that eventual bleeding at the pathway walls can be observed and controlled.

The experience, taken from 81 selected cases, including primary and secondary brain tumors, cavernous angiomas, intraparenchymal hematomas, cerebellar infarctions, sellar tumors, and brain abscess, proves the technique as an accurate and safe procedure. Except for a transient third nerve paresis in a patient with mesial temporal metastasis, no additional neurological deficit was produced in this series of patients.

The patients treated with this method had a shorter ICU and hospital stay when compared to similar cases treated by microsurgical technique by the same group of surgeons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fries G, Perneczky A (1998) Endoscope-assisted brain surgery: part 2 – analysis of 380 procedures. Neurosurgery 42:226–231; discussion 231–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Alencastro L (2012) Movement driven vision – a concept for endoscopic microsurgery. Endoworld 24

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andrews RJ, Bringas JR (1993) A review of brain retraction and recommendations for minimizing intraoperative brain injury. Neurosurgery 33:1052–1063; discussion 1063–1064

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ogura K, Tachibana E, Aoshima C, Sumitomo M (2006) New microsurgical technique for intraparenchymal lesions of the brain: transcylinder approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148:779–785; discussion 785

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yokoh A, Sugita K, Kobayashi S (1983) Intermittent versus continuous brain retraction. An experimental study. J Neurosurg 58:918–923

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Oi S (1999) Clinical application and future prospect of neuroendoscopic surgery. No To Hattatsu 31:299–304

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Garrett M, Consiglieri G, Nakaji P (2010) Transcranial minimally invasive neurosurgery for tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am 21:595–605, v

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kelly PJ, Ganslandt O, Fahlbusch R, Nimsky C, Stadlbauer A, Moser E (2004) Technology in the resection of gliomas and the definition of madness. Authors’ reply. J Neurosurg 101:284–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hellwig D, Bauer BL (1991) Endoscopic procedures in stereotactic neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir Suppl 52:30–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hellwig D, Bauer BL (1992) Minimally invasive neurosurgery by means of ultrathin endoscopes. Acta Neurochir Suppl 54:63–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wan J, Jiang C (1998) Development and clinical application of a brain stereotactic endoscope. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 36:536–538

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tirakotai W, Hellwig D, Bertalanffy H, Riegel T (2007) The role of neuroendoscopy in the management of solid or solid-cystic intra- and periventricular tumours. Childs Nerv Syst 23:653–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fiorindi A, Longatti P (2008) A restricted neuroendoscopic approach for pathological diagnosis of intraventricular and paraventricular tumours. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150:1235–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakano T, Ohkuma H, Asano K, Ogasawara Y (2009) Endoscopic treatment for deep-seated or multiple intraparenchymal tumors: technical note. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 52:49–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nishihara T, Teraoka A, Morita A, Ueki K, Takai K, Kirino T (2000) A transparent sheath for endoscopic surgery and its application in surgical evacuation of spontaneous intracerebral hematomas. Technical note. J Neurosurg 92:1053–1055

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen CC, Cho DY, Chang CS, Chen JT, Lee WY, Lee HC (2005) A stainless steel sheath for endoscopic surgery and its application in surgical evacuation of putaminal haemorrhage. J Clin Neurosci 12:937–940

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Oi S, Samii A, Samii M (2005) Frameless free-hand maneuvering of a small-diameter rigid-rod neuroendoscope with a working channel used during high-resolution imaging. Technical note. J Neurosurg 102:113–118

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Akai T, Shiraga S, Sasagawa Y, Okamoto K, Tachibana O, Lizuka H (2008) Intra-parenchymal tumor biopsy using neuroendoscopy with navigation. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 51:83–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kassam AB, Engh JA, Mintz AH, Prevedello DM (2009) Completely endoscopic resection of intraparenchymal brain tumors. J Neurosurg 110:116–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rohde V, Reinges MH, Krombach GA, Gilsbach JM (1998) The combined use of image-guided frameless stereotaxy and neuroendoscopy for the surgical management of occlusive hydrocephalus and intracranial cysts. Br J Neurosurg 12:531–538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hopf NJ, Grunert P, Darabi K, Busert C, Bettag M (1999) Frameless neuronavigation applied to endoscopic neurosurgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 42:187–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schroeder HW, Wagner W, Tschiltschke W, Gaab MR (2001) Frameless neuronavigation in intracranial endoscopic neurosurgery. J Neurosurg 94:72–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Alberti O, Riegel T, Hellwig D, Bertalanffy H (2001) Frameless navigation and endoscopy. J Neurosurg 95(3):541–543

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Froelich J, Bien S, Hoppe M, Eggers F, Klose KJ (1996) An intracerebral sonographic catheter as an adjunct to stereotactic guided endoscopic procedures. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 39:93–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fernandez-Miranda JC, Engh JA, Pathak SK et al (2010) High-definition fiber tracking guidance for intraparenchymal endoscopic port surgery. J Neurosurg 113:990–999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Oka K, Go Y, Yamamoto M, Kumate S, Tomonaga M (1999) Experience with an ultrasonic aspirator in neuroendoscopy. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 42:32–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luiz Carlos de Alencastro PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Alencastro, L.C., de Alencastro, L.F., Lodetti, A.A., Faria, M.d.B. (2014). Neuroendoscopic Management of Intraparenchymal Lesions. In: Sgouros, S. (eds) Neuroendoscopy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39085-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39085-2_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39084-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39085-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics