Abstract
Driven by outside economic forces and the effects of climate change, the Arctic, its ecosystems, and its people are all faced with substantial change ranging from the loss of ice-dependent species, more intense human uses of the Arctic, and the loss of natural services provided by Arctic ecosystems. In addition to business opportunities, these changes represent new risks to the Arctic’s unique natural environment and to the people who now live and work in the Arctic. Once new human activities begin in the Arctic Ocean, it will be difficult for policymakers and planners to put limits on them. This paper explores a new approach to the integrated management of human activities—marine spatial planning (MSP). MSP seeks to reduce conflicts among human activities and balance the conservation of ecologically important areas with the sustainable development of marine resources in the Arctic. With the exception of Norway, most Arctic governments have been slow to advance marine spatial planning. A way to advance MSP in the Arctic would be to explicitly recognize the importance of moving beyond sole reliance on the initiatives of national governments and towards a pan-Arctic approach to guide the future of the region. Networks and partnerships of non-governmental actors, including indigenous peoples, environmental NGOs, academia, and private industry, all of whom have influence over governmental policies and actions, could be used to initiate MSP across the Arctic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arctic Council (2004) Arctic Marine Strategic Plan. 24 Nov 2004. Available at <http://www.pame.is/images/stories/AMSP_files/AMSP-Nov-2004.pdf>. Accessed 5 Feb 2013
Arctic Council (2012) Report to senior Arctic officials. The 2nd Arctic Council Ecosystem-based Management Experts Group Meeting, Gothenburg, Sweden, 16–18 Apr 2012
Arkema KK, Abramson SC, Dewsbury BM (2006) Marine ecosystem-based management: from characterization to implementation. Front Ecol Environ 4(10):525–532
Beaufort Sea Partnership (2009) Integrated Ocean Management Plan for the Beaufort Sea. Beaufort Sea Planning Office, Inuvik
Convention on Biological Diversity (1992) Convention on Biological Diversity, 5 June 1992, 1760 U.N.T.S. 79. Entered into force 29 Dec 1991
Crowder L, Norse E (2008) Essential ecological insights for marine ecosystem-based management and marine spatial planning. Marine Policy 32:772–778
Crowder LB, Osherenko G, Young OR, Airamé S, Norse EA, Baron N et al (2006) Resolving mismatches in US ocean governance. Science 313(5787):617–618
Ehler C, Douvere F (2007) Visions for a Sea Change. Report of the first international workshop on marine spatial planning. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and Man and the Biosphere Programme. IOC Manual and Guides, 46: ICAM Dossier, 3. UNESCO, Paris
Ehler C, Douvere F (2009) Marine Spatial Planning: a step-by-step approach toward ecosystem-based management. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and Man and the Biosphere Programme. IOC Manual and Guides No. 53, ICAM Dossier No. 6. UNESCO, Paris
European Commission (2010) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Maritime Spatial Planning in the EU—Achievements and Future Development, COM (2010) 771 final. 12 Dec 2010
European Commission and High Representative (2012) Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council. Developing a European Union Policy towards the Arctic Region: progress since 2008 and next steps. JOIN(2012) 19 final. 26 June 2012
Hoel AH (2009) Best practices in ecosystem-based oceans management in the Arctic. Report No. 129 of the Norwegian Polar Institute, Polar Environmental Centre
National Ocean Council (2012) Draft National Ocean Policy Implementation Plan, 12 Jan 2012. <http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ceq/national_ocean_policy_draft_implementation_plan_01-12-12.pdf>. Accessed 5 Feb 2013
Norwegian Ministry of the Environment (2005) Integrated Management of the Marine Environment of the Barents Sea and the Sea Areas Off the Lofoten Islands. Report No. 8 to the Storting
Norwegian Ministry of the Environment (2009) Integrated Management of the Marine Environment of the Norwegian Sea. Report No. 37 to the Storting
PAME (2009) PAME Work Plan 2009–2011. <http://www.pame.is/pame-work-plan/work-plan-2009-2011>. Accessed 5 Feb 2013
Pomeroy R, Douvere F (2008) The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process. Marine Policy 32:816–822
Speer L, Laughlin T (2011) IUCN/NRDC Workshop to identify areas of ecological and biological significance or vulnerability in the Arctic marine environment. Workshop report. 7 Apr 2011
Spiridonov VA, Gavrilo MV, Krasnova ED, Nikolaeva NG (2011) Atlas of marine and coastal biological diversity of the Russian Arctic. WWF Russia, Moscow
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ehler, C.N. (2014). Pan-Arctic Marine Spatial Planning: An Idea Whose Time Has Come. In: Tedsen, E., Cavalieri, S., Kraemer, R. (eds) Arctic Marine Governance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38595-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38595-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38594-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38595-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)