Abstract
The concept of product semantics and its focus on meaning is used to interpret design research as design. It is argued that we may conceive of design research as design in two realms: The practical and the academic. In doing design research, there is a reciprocal shaping of artifacts: Better artifacts (contributions to practice) through appropriation of knowledge and methods from the academic realm, and better knowledge artifacts (contributions to academia) by drawing relevance and experiences of appropriation from the practical realm. We adopt a product semantics view to discuss research as design. Product semantics highlights the meaning of artifacts with respect to their (i) stakeholders, (ii) artifacts-in-use, (iii), artifacts-in-language, (iv) artifact lifecycle, and (v) ecology. Based on this interpretation, we propose activities that should characterize the practice of doing design research. Finally we provide an example of Design Research Practice in action.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hevner, A.R.: A three-cycle view of design science research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 19(2), 87–92 (2007)
Iivari, J.: A paradigmatic analysis of information systems as a design science. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 19(2), 39–64 (2007)
March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural-science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15(4), 251–266 (1995)
Purao, S., Baldwin, C.Y., Hevner, A., Story, V.C., Pries-Heje, J., Smith, B., Zhu, Y.: The Sciences of Design: Observations on an Emerging Field. Working paper. Harvard Business School (2008)
Baskerville, R., Lyytinen, K., Sambamurthy, V., Straub, D.: A response to the design-oriented information systems research memorandum. European Journal of Information Systems 20, 11–15 (2011a)
Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 1(28), 75–105 (2004)
Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The Anatomy of a Design Theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8(5), 312–335 (2007)
Kuechler, B., Vaishnavi, V.: On theory development in design science research: anatomy of a research project. European Journal of Information Systems 17(5), 489–504 (2008)
Sein, M.K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Lindgren, R.: Action Design Research. MIS Quarterly 35(1), 37–56 (2011)
Baskerville, R., Kaul, M., Storey, V.: Unpacking the Duality of Design Science. In: ICIS 2011 Proceedings. Paper 10 (2011b)
Orlikowski, W., Iacono, C.: Research commentary: desperately seeking the ”IT” in IT research-A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research 12(2), 121–134 (2001)
Gill, T.G., Hevner, A.R.: A Fitness-Utility Model for Design Science Research. In: Jain, H., Sinha, A.P., Vitharana, P. (eds.) DESRIST 2011. LNCS, vol. 6629, pp. 237–252. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Winograd, T., Flores, F.: Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Ablex, Norwood (1986)
Ehn, P.: The Art and Science of Designing Computer Artefacts. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 1(1), Art. 3 (1989)
Cross, N.: Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus de sign science. Design Issues 17(3), 49–55 (2001)
Krippendorff, K.: The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design. CRC Press (2006)
Sjöström, J.: Designing Information System – A pragmatic account. Doctoral Dissertation, Uppsala University, Sweden (2010) ISBN 978-91-506-2149-5
Gherardi, S.: Introduction: The Critical Power of the ’Practice Lens’. Management Learning 40(2), 115–128 (2009)
Schatski, T.R.: Introduction: Practice theory. In: Schatzki, T.R., Knorr, C.K., von Savigny, E. (eds.) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. Routledge, London (2001)
Giddens, A.: The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Polity, Cambridge (1984)
Orlikowski, W.: The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science 3(3), 398–427 (1992)
Goldkuhl, G.: Design theories in information systems-a need for multi- grounding. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 6(2), 59–72 (2004)
DeSanctis, G.: The Social Life of Information Systems Research - A Response to Benbasat and Zmud’s Call for Returning to the IT Artifact. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 4(7), 360–376 (2003)
Dewey, J.: Logic: The theory of inquiry. Henry Holt and Company, New York (1938)
Venable, J.: A framework for Design Science research activities. In: Khosrow-Pour, M. (ed.) 2006 Information Resources Management Association International Conference, May 21, pp. 184–187. Idea Group Publishing, Washington, DC (2006)
Gregor, S., Hevner, A.: Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact. Paper Currently Under Journal Review (in press)
Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The Balanced Scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 71–80 (January- February 1992)
Helfert, M., Costello, G., Donnellan, B.: The Case for Design Science Utility -Evaluation of Design Science Artefacts within the IT Capability Maturity Framework. In: Artifact Design and Workplace Intervention (ADWI) Workshop, Barcelona, June 10 (2012)
Donnellan, B., Helfert, M.: The IT-CMF: A Practical Application of Design Science. In: Winter, R., Zhao, J.L., Aier, S. (eds.) DESRIST 2010. LNCS, vol. 6105, pp. 550–553. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Bateson, G.: Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. University of Chicago Press (1972) ISBN 0-226-03905-6
Orlikowski, W.: Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science 11(4), 404–428 (2000)
Ågerfalk, P.J.: Investigating Actability Dimensions: A language/action perspective on criteria for information systems evaluation. Interacting with Computers 16(5), 957–988 (2004)
Ehn, P.: Review of The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design. Artifact 1(1), 59–63 (2007)
Polanyi, M.: The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday & Co. Inc., New York (1966)
Walsham, G.: The emergence of interpretivism in IS research. Information Systems Research 6(4), 376–394 (1995)
Klein, H.K., Myers, M.D.: A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly 23(1), 67–93 (1999)
De Sanctis, G., Poole, M.S.: Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science 5(2), 121–147 (1994)
Trigg, R., Bødker, S.: From implementation to design: Tailoring and the emergence of systematization. In: Proceedings CSCW 1994, Chapel Hill, NC (1994)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sjöström, J., Donnellan, B., Helfert, M. (2012). Product Semantics in Design Research Practice. In: Bhattacherjee, A., Fitzgerald, B. (eds) Shaping the Future of ICT Research. Methods and Approaches. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 389. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35142-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35142-6_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35141-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35142-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)