Abstract
The aim of tissue engineering is to develop cell, construct, and living system technologies to restore the structures and functions of damaged or degenerated tissues. Surgical strategies that have evolved to deal with tissue loss include organ transplantation from one individual to another, tissue transfer from a healthy site to an affected site in the same individual, and replacement of tissue functions with synthetic material devices. All of these strategies have limitations. Organ transplantation is not always feasible as the number of organ donors is far less than the number of patients waiting for organ transplantation. The complications of immuno-suppressive agents are also trouble for the organ recipients. Tissue engineering (TE) seeks to provide a new solution to tissue loss. Scaffolds with porous microstructures are commonly used in TE. This chapter reviews and reports the TE strategy, requirements of scaffolds in TE, as well as different biomaterials that are often used to fabricate tissue engineering scaffolds.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen C, Yu Y, Maysinger D, Eisenberg A (1998) Polycaprolactone-b-poly(ethylene Oxide) block copolymer micelles as a novel drug delivery vehicle for neurotrophic agents FK506 and L-685,818. Bioconjug Chem 9(5):564–572
Albertsson AC (2002) Degradable aliphatic polyesters. Springer, Berlin
ASTM standard F2150 (2002) Standard guide for characterization and testing of biomaterial scaffolds used in tissue-engineered medical products. ASTM international, West conshohocken, PA, USA
ASTM standard F 1635-04a (2004) Standard test method for in vitro degradation testing of hydrolytically degradable polymer resins and fabricated forms for surgical implants. ASTM international, West conshohocken, PA, USA
Bell E (1993) Tissue engineering: current perspectives. Birkhäuser, Boston
Blümm E, Owen AJ (1995) Miscibility, crystallization and melting of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate)/poly (l-lactide) blends. Polym 36(21):4077–4081
Chen LJ, Wang M (2002) Production and evaluation of biodegradable composites based on PHB—PHV copolymer. Biomater 23(13):2631–2639
Chen Y, Mak AFT, Wang M, Li J, Wong MS (2006) PLLA scaffolds with biomimetic apatite coating and biomimetic apatite/collagen composite coating to enhance osteoblast-like cells attachment and activity. Surf Coat Tech 201(3–4):575–580
Fung YC (1993) Biomechanics : mechanical properties of living tissues. Springer, New York
Galgut P, Pitrola R, Waite I, Doyle C, Smith R (1991) Histological evaluation of biodegradable and non-degradable membranes placed transcutaneously in rats. J Clin Periodontol 18(8):581–586
Garlotta D (2001) A literature review of poly(lactic acid). J Polym Environ 9(2):63–84
Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cambridge University Press, New York
Gogolewski S, Jovanovic M, Perren SM, Dillon JG, Hughes MK (1993) Tissue response and in vivo degradation of selected polyhydroxyacids: polylactides (PLA), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHB/VA). J Biomed Mater Res 27(9):1135–1148
Gupta B, Revagade N, Hilborn J (2007) Poly(lactic acid) fiber: an overview. Prog Polym Sci 32(4):455–482
Holmes PA (1982) Developments in crystalline polymers. In: Bassett DC (ed). Elsevier Applied Science, London
Hutmacher DW (2000) Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 21(24):2529–2543
Ikada Y, Tsuji H (2000) Biodegradable polyesters for medical and ecological applications. Macromol Rapid Comm 21(3):117–132
Kenar H, Kocabas A, Aydinli A, Hasirci V (2008) Chemical and topographical modification of PHBV surface to promote osteoblast alignment and confinement. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 85A(4):1001–1010
Khan Y, Yaszemski MJ, Mikos AG, Laurencin CT (2008) Tissue engineering of bone: material and matrix considerations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Supplement_1):36–42
Koegler WS, Griffith LG (2004) Osteoblast response to PLGA tissue engineering scaffolds with PEO modified surface chemistries and demonstration of patterned cell response. Biomater 25(14):2819–2830
Kumagai Y, Doi Y (1992a) Enzymatic degradation and morphologies of binary blends of microbial poly(3-hydroxy butyrate) with poly(caprolactone), poly(1,4-butylene adipate and poly(vinyl acetate). Polym Degrad Stabil 36(3):241–248
Kumagai Y, Doi Y (1992b) Enzymatic degradation of binary blends of microbial poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) with enzymatically active polymers. Polym Degrad Stabil 37(3):253–256
Kumarasuriyar A, Jackson RA, Grondahl L, Trau M, Nurcombe V, Cool SM (2005) Poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) supports in vitro osteogenesis. Tissue Eng 11(7–8):1281–1295
Langer R, Vacanti J (1993) Tissue engineering. Sci 260(5110):920–926
Lee SJ, Lim GJ, Lee JW, Atala A, Yoo JJ (2006) In vitro evaluation of a poly(lactide-co-glycolide)-collagen composite scaffold for bone regeneration. Biomater 27(18):3466–3472
Liu H, Slamovich EB, Webster TJ (2006) Increased osteoblast functions among nanophase titania/poly(lactide-co-glycolide) composites of the highest nanometer surface roughness. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 78A(4):798–807
Liu X, Ma PX (2004) Polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng 32(3):477–486
Lowry KJ, Hamson KR, Bear L, Peng YB, Calaluce R, Evans ML, Anglen JO, Allen WC (1997) Polycaprolactone/glass bioabsorbable implant in a rabbit humerus fracture model. J Biomed Mater Res 36(4):536–541
Lu HH, Cooper JJA, Manuel S, Freeman JW, Attawia MA, Ko FK, Laurencin CT (2005) Anterior cruciate ligament regeneration using braided biodegradable scaffolds: in vitro optimization studies. Biomater 26(23):4805–4816
Lucchesi C, Ferreira B, Duek E, Santos A, Joazeiro P (2008) Increased response of vero cells to PHBV matrices treated by plasma. J Mater Sci Mater Med 19(2):635–643
Lutton C, Read J, Trau M (2001) Nanostructured biomaterials: a novel approach to artificial bone implants. Aust J Chem 55:621–623
Luzier WD (1992) Materials derived from biomass/biodegradable materials. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 89(3):839–842
Ma PX (2004) Scaffolds for tissue fabrication. Mater Today 7(5):30–40
Marra KG, Szem JW, Kumta PN, DiMilla PA, Weiss LE (1999a) In vitro analysis of biodegradable polymer blend/hydroxyapatite composites for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res 47(3):324–335
Marra KG, Szem JW, Kumta PN, DiMilla PA, Weiss LE (1999b) Tissue-engineered bone regeneration. Nat Biotech 18(9):959–963
Park JB (1979) Biomaterials: an introduction. Plenum Press, New York
Park JB, Bronzino JD (2003) Biomaterials : principles and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Park JW, Doi Y, Iwata T (2004) Uniaxial drawing and mechanical properties of poly[(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate]/poly(l-lactic acid) blends. biomacromolecules, 5(4):1557–1566
Ratner BD (2004) Biomaterials science : an introduction to materials in medicine. Elsevier Academic Press, UK
Renard E, Walls M, Guérin P, Langlois V (2004) Hydrolytic degradation of blends of polyhydroxyalkanoates and functionalized polyhydroxyalkanoates. Polym Degrad Stab 85(2):779–787
Rose FRAJ and Oreffo ROC (2002) Bone tissue engineering: hope vs hype. Biochem Bioph Res Co 292(1):1–7
Schieker M, Seitz H, Drosse I, Seitz S, Mutschler W (2006) Biomaterials as scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Eur J Trauma 32(2):114–124
Schultz O, Sittinger M, Haeupl T, Burmester GR (2000) Emerging strategies of bone and joint repair. Arthritis Res 2(6):433–436
Seal BL, Otero TC, Panitch A (2001) Polymeric biomaterials for tissue and organ regeneration. Mater Sci Eng R: Reports 34(4–5):147–230
Sherwood JK, Riley SL, Palazzolo R, Brown SC, Monkhouse DC, Coates M, Griffith LG, Landeen LK, Ratcliffe A (2002) A three-dimensional osteochondral composite scaffold for articular cartilage repair. Biomater 23(24):4739–4751
Slater S, Mitsky TA, Houmiel KL, Hao M, Reiser SE, Taylor NB, Tran M, Valentin HE, Rodriguez DJ, Stone DA et al (1999) Metabolic engineering of arabidopsis and Brassica for poly(3-hydroxybutyrate- co-3-hydroxyvalerate) copolymer production. Nat Biotech 17(10):1011–1016
Spitzer RS, Perka C, Lindenhayn K, Zippel H (2002) Matrix engineering for osteogenic differentiation of rabbit periosteal cells using alpha-tricalcium phosphate particles in a three-dimensional fibrin culture. J Biomed Mater Res 59(4):690–696
Temenoff JS, Mikos AG (2000) Review: tissue engineering for regeneration of articular cartilage. Biomater 21(5):431–440
Verhoogt H, Ramsay BA, Favis BD (1994) Polymer blends containing poly(3-hydroxyalkanoate)s. Polym 35(24):5155–5169
Wang M (2004) Biomaterials and tissue engineering. In: Shi DL (ed) Biological and medical physics, biomedical engineering, Springer, Heidelberg, 11, p 246
Yaszemski MJ (2004) Biomaterials in orthopedics. M. Dekker, New York
Yoon JS, Chang MC, Kim MN, Kang EJ, Kim C, Chin IJ (1996) Compatibility and fungal degradation of poly[(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate]/aliphatic copolyester blend. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phy 34(15):2543–2551
Yu L (2009) Biodegradable polymer blends and composites from renewable resources. Wiley, Hoboken
Zeltinger J, Sherwood JK, Graham DA, Mueller R, Griffith LG (2001) Effect of pore size and void fraction on cellular adhesion, proliferation, and matrix deposition. Tissue Eng 7(5):557–572
Zhao J, Yuan X, Cui Y, Ge Q, Yao K (2004) Preparation and characterization of poly(L-lactide)/poly(caprolactone) fibrous scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. J Appl Polym Sci 91(3):1676–1684
Zhou WY (2007) Selective laser sintering of Poly (L-Lactide)/carbonated hydroxyapatite porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mech Eng, The University of Hong Kong, PhD Thesis
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sultana, N. (2013). Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering. In: Biodegradable Polymer-Based Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34802-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34802-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34801-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34802-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)