Skip to main content

Ontology Relation Alignment Based on Attribute Semantics

  • Conference paper
Computational Collective Intelligence. Technologies and Applications (ICCCI 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7654))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The problem of ontology alignment is based on finding mappings between instances, concepts and relations of two ontologies which (following Gruber’s work [8]) can be defined as explicit specification of decomposition of some part of reality. This specification spreads over three levels of detail: the concept attribute level, the concept level and the relation level. This paper concentrates on identifying matches between relations of concepts which describe how these entities interact with each other. After careful analysis we have noticed that this level can be a source of many inconsistencies when two ontologies are blindly integrated. We take our work on attribute-based concept alignment and the consensus theory as a starting point. We extend it to handle the issues that appear when aligning relations. We give formal definitions along with careful formalization of set of requirements that eventual mapping algorithm should satisfy in order to reliably designate matches between ontologies on relation level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Batet, M., Sanchez, D., Valls, A.: An ontology-based measure to compute semantic similarity in biomedicine. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 44(1), 118–125 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Day, W.H.E.: Consensus methods as tools for data analysis. In: Bock, H.H. (ed.) Classification and Related Methods for Data Analysis, pp. 312–324. North-Holland (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dellschaft, K., Staab, S.: On How to Perform a Gold Standard Based Evaluation of Ontology Learning. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 228–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Duong, T.H., Jo, G.S., Jung, J.J., Nguyen, N.T.: Complexity analysis of ontology integration methodologies: A comparative study. Journal of Universal Computer Science 15, 877–897 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching, 1st edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Euzenat, J., Meilicke, C., Stuckenschmidt, H., Shvaiko, P., Trojahn, C.: Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative: Six Years of Experience. In: Spaccapietra, S. (ed.) Journal on Data Semantics XV. LNCS, vol. 6720, pp. 158–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P., Yatskevich, M.: Semantic Schema Matching. In: Meersman, R. (ed.) OTM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3760, pp. 347–365. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grau, B.C., Horrocks, I., Motik, B., Parsia, B., Patel-Schneider, P., Sattler, U.: OWL 2: The next step for OWL. Web Semantics: Science. Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 6, 309–322 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen, N.T.: Advanced Methods for Inconsistent Knowledge Management. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nguyen, N.T.: A Method for Ontology Conflict Resolution and Integration on Relation Level. Cybernetics and Systems 38(8), 781–797 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Pietranik, M., Nguyen, N.T.: A Method for Ontology Alignment Based Attribute Semantics. Cybernetics and Systems 43(4), 319–339 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pietranik, M., Nguyen, N.T.: A Multi-attribute and Logic-Based Framework of Ontology Alignment. In: Zgrzywa, A., Choroś, K., Siemiński, A. (eds.) Multimedia and Internet Systems: Theory and Practice. AISC, vol. 183, pp. 99–108. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Pietranik, M., Nguyen, N.T.: Attribute Mapping as a Foundation of Ontology Alignment. In: Nguyen, N.T., Kim, C.-G., Janiak, A. (eds.) ACIIDS 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6591, pp. 455–465. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Pietranik, M., Nguyen, N.T.: Semantic Distance Measure between Ontology Concept’s Attributes. In: König, A., Dengel, A., Hinkelmann, K., Kise, K., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6881, pp. 210–219. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J., Giunchiglia, F., Stuckenschmidt, H., Mao, M., Cruz, I.: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Ontology Matching (2010), http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-689/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pietranik, M.M., Nguyen, N.T. (2012). Ontology Relation Alignment Based on Attribute Semantics. In: Nguyen, NT., Hoang, K., Jȩdrzejowicz, P. (eds) Computational Collective Intelligence. Technologies and Applications. ICCCI 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7654. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34707-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34707-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34706-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34707-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics