Skip to main content

A Formal Deconstruction of Fluid Construction Grammar

  • Chapter
Computational Issues in Fluid Construction Grammar

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7249))

  • 776 Accesses

Abstract

Fluid construction grammar was primarily developed for supporting the on-line processing and learning of grammatical language in robotic language game setups, and with a focus on semantics and constructrion grammar. In contrast, many related formalisms were developed to support the formulation of static, primarily syntactic theories of natural language. As a result, many of fcg’s features are absent in other formalisms, or take a somewhat different form. This can be confusing and give fcg a ‘peculiar’ status from the perspective of those more familiar with other formalisms. This chapter aims to clarify some of these peculiarities by providing a formal deconstruction of fcg based on a reconstruction of it’s history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abelson, H., Sussman, G.J.: Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs, 2nd edn. MIT Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, C.F., Fillmore, C.J., Lowe, J.B.: The Berkeley FrameNet Project. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bergen, B., Chang, N.: Embodied Construction Grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In: Östman, J.O., Fried, M. (eds.) Construction Grammar(s): Cognitive and Cross-Language Dimensions. Johns Benjamins (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chomsky, N.: The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Ciortuz, L., Saveluc, V.: Fluid Construction Grammar and Feature Constraint Logics. In: Steels, L. (ed.) Computational Issues in FCG. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7249, pp. 289–311. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Croft, W.: Logical and typological arguments for radical construction grammar. In: Ostman, J., Fried, M. (eds.) Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions. John Benjamin Publ. Cy., Amsterdam (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Beule, J.: Compositionality, Hierarchy and Recursion in Language, a Case Study in Fluid Construction Grammar. Ph.D. thesis, VUB Artificial Intelligence Lab. (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fillmore, C.J.: Frame semantics. In: Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Seoul, pp. 111–137 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gentner, T.Q., Fenn, K.M., Margoliash, D., Nusbaum, H.C.: Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds. Nature (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goldberg, A.: Constructions: A Construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hauser, M.D., Chomsky, N., Fitch, W.T.: The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569–1579 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jackendoff, R., Pinker, S.: The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (reply to fitch, hauser, and chomsky). Cognition (September 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Norvig, P.: Paradigms of AI: Case studies in Common Lisp. PWS Publishing Company (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pollard, C., Sag, I.: Head-driven phrase structure grammar. University of Chicago Press, Center for the Study of Language and Information of Stanford University, Chicago (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sag, I.A., Wasow, T., Bender, E.M.: Syntactic Theory, A Formal Introduction., 2nd edn. CSLI Publications, Leland Stanford Junior University, United States (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Santibáñez, J.S.: A Logic Programming Approach to Parsing and Production in Fluid Construction Grammar. In: Steels, L. (ed.) Computational Issues in FCG. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7249, pp. 239–255. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Steels, L., Vogt, P.: Grounding adaptive language games in robotic agents. In: Husbands, P., Harvey, I. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Artificial Life (ECAL 1997). Complex Adaptive Systems. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wellens, P.: Organizing constructions in networks. In: Steels, L. (ed.) Design Patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar., John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

De Beule, J. (2012). A Formal Deconstruction of Fluid Construction Grammar. In: Steels, L. (eds) Computational Issues in Fluid Construction Grammar. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7249. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34120-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34120-5_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34119-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34120-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics