Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 576 Accesses

Abstract

The presence of radio noise affects the measurement of the air shower induced radio pulse at each antenna and predominantly determines the error of the measurement. Noise can interfere constructively or destructively with the radio pulse and increases or decreases the pulse amplitudes. On average noise increases the measured pulse amplitudes since the power of the noise adds to the pulse power. It will be shown that this effect depends on the signal-to-noise ratio, and that noise systematically flattens the lateral distribution of the radio signal. Therefore, an adequate treatment of noise is especially important for experiments in a noisy environment, like LOPES.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A summary of this chapter is published in Nuclear Instruments and Methods A 662 (2012) S238–S241 [7].

  2. 2.

    For experiments aiming at the detection of molecular bremsstrahlung at GHz frequencies, measuring the integrated pulse power will not significantly change the signal-to-noise ratio and the detection threshold, since the pulse duration is expected to be much longer than the reciprocal of the observing frequency.

  3. 3.

    In previous LOPES analyses ([5, 6]) the signal in individual antennas has been defined as the maximum absolute field strength. This is almost but not exactly equal to the maximum of the Hilbert envelope, which typically exceeds the maximum absolute field strength by a few percent.

  4. 4.

    In addition, two other methods have been tested to determine \(A_\mathrm{true }(A_\mathrm{meas })\) and \(\Delta A_\mathrm{true }(A_\mathrm{meas })\), but failed: First, the inverse function of \(A_\mathrm{meas }(A_\mathrm{true })\), which would be available directly, is not defined for \(A_\mathrm{meas } < 1\). But this range is important for analysis, as \(12\,\%\) of the measurements in individual antennas have a signal-to-noise ratio \(A_\mathrm{meas } < 1\) (see Fig. 6.9). Second, using confidence intervals instead of mean and standard deviation failed. The problem is that for any confidence level \(\gamma \), there exists a minimum amplitude \(A_\mathrm{min }\), for which the probability that a pulse amplitude is reduced by noise to a value \(A_\mathrm{meas } < A_\mathrm{min }\) is smaller than \(1-\gamma \). Therefore, \(A_\mathrm{true }(A_\mathrm{meas })\) would be undefined for \(A_\mathrm{meas }\) close to \(0\), at least for centered confidence intervals. However, uncentered confidence intervals yield questionable results at high signal-to-noise ratios, since \(A_\mathrm{true }\) would systematically deviate from the mean \(A_\mathrm{meas }\).

References

  1. CCIR (International Radio Consultative Committee). Worldwide minimum external noise levels, \(0.1\,\)Hz to \(100\,\)GHz. CCIR Report 670, ITU, Geneva, Switzerland, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ITU (International Telecommunication Union). Radio noise. Recommendation ITU-R P.372-10, ITU, Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  3. K.-D. Kammeyer. Nachrichtenübertragung (4. Ausgabe). B.G. Teubner, Reihe Informationstechnik, Stuttgart, Deutschland, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  4. O. Krömer. Empfangssystem zur Radioobservation hochenergetischer kosmischer Schauer und sein Verhalten bei Selbsttriggerung. FZKA Report 7396, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W.D. Apel et al. - LOPES Collaboration. Lateral distribution of the radio signal in extensive air showers measured with LOPES. Astroparticle Physics, 32:294–303, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Nehls. Calibrated Measurements of the Radio Emission of Cosmic Ray Air Showers. FZKA Report 7440, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. G. Schröder et al. - LOPES Collaboration. On noise treatment in radio measurements of cosmic ray air showers. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 662(Supplement 1):S238–S241, 2012. ARENA 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank G. Schröder .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schröder, F.G. (2012). Treatment of Noise. In: Instruments and Methods for the Radio Detection of High Energy Cosmic Rays. Springer Theses. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33660-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33660-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33659-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33660-7

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics