Skip to main content

Towards Automatic Verification of Behavior Preservation for Model Transformation via Invariant Checking

  • Conference paper
Graph Transformations (ICGT 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7562))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The correctness of model transformations is a crucial element for model-driven engineering of high quality software. In particular, behavior preservation is the most important correctness property avoiding the introduction of semantic errors during the model-driven engineering process. Behavior preservation verification techniques either show that specific properties are preserved, or more generally and complex, they show some kind of bisimulation between source and target model of the transformation. Both kinds of behavior preservation verification goals have been presented with automatic tool support for the instance level, i.e. for a given source and target model specified by the model transformation. However, up until now there is no automatic verification approach available at the transformation level, i.e. for all source and target models specified by the model transformation. In this paper, we present a first approach towards automatic behavior preservation verification for model transformations specified by triple graph grammars and semantic definitions given by graph transformation rules. In particular, we show that the behavior preservation problem can be reduced to invariant checking for graph transformation. We discuss today’s limitations of invariant checking for graph transformation and motivate further lines of future work in this direction.

This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft in the course of the project - Correct Model Transformations - see http://www.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/giese/ projekte/kormoran.html?L=1 .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Milner, R.: Communication and Concurrency. Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd., Hertfordshire (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Varró, D., Pataricza, A.: Automated Formal Verification of Model Transformations. In: Jürjens, J., Rumpe, B., France, R., Fernandez, E.B. (eds.) CSDUML 2003: Critical Systems Development in UML; Proceedings of the UML 2003 Workshop. Number TUM-I0323 in Technical Report, Technische Universitat Munchen, pp. 63–78 (September 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Engels, G., Kleppe, A., Rensink, A., Semenyak, M., Soltenborn, C., Wehrheim, H.: From UML Activities to TAAL - Towards Behaviour-Preserving Model Transformations. In: Schieferdecker, I., Hartman, A. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2008. LNCS, vol. 5095, pp. 94–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Narayanan, A., Karsai, G.: Verifying Model Transformations by Structural Correspondence. Electronic Communications of the EASST: Graph Transformation and Visual Modeling Techniques 2008 10 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Giese, H., Glesner, S., Leitner, J., Schäfer, W., Wagner, R.: Towards Verified Model Transformations. In: Hearnden, D., Süß, J., Baudry, B., Rapin, N. (eds.) Proc. of the 3rd International Workshop on Model Development, Validation and Verification (MoDeV2a). Genova, Italy, Le Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique - CEA, pp. 78–93 (October 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hülsbusch, M., König, B., Rensink, A., Semenyak, M., Soltenborn, C., Wehrheim, H.: Showing Full Semantics Preservation in Model Transformation - A Comparison of Techniques. In: Méry, D., Merz, S. (eds.) IFM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6396, pp. 183–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Rangel, G., Lambers, L., König, B., Ehrig, H., Baldan, P.: Behavior Preservation in Model Refactoring using DPO Transformations with Borrowed Contexts. In: Ehrig, H., Heckel, R., Rozenberg, G., Taentzer, G. (eds.) ICGT 2008. LNCS, vol. 5214, pp. 242–256. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Bisztray, D., Heckel, R., Ehrig, H.: Compositional Verification of Architectural Refactorings. In: de Lemos, R., Fabre, J.-C., Gacek, C., Gadducci, F., ter Beek, M. (eds.) Architecting Dependable Systems VI. LNCS, vol. 5835, pp. 308–333. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Schürr, A.: Specification of Graph Translators with Triple Graph Grammars. In: Mayr, E.W., Schmidt, G., Tinhofer, G. (eds.) WG 1994. LNCS, vol. 903, pp. 151–163. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Becker, B., Beyer, D., Giese, H., Klein, F., Schilling, D.: Symbolic Invariant Verification for Systems with Dynamic Structural Adaptation. In: Proc. of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), Shanghai, China. ACM Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Becker, B., Lambers, L., Dyck, J., Birth, S., Giese, H.: Iterative Development of Consistency-Preserving Rule-Based Refactorings. In: Cabot, J., Visser, E. (eds.) ICMT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6707, pp. 123–137. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Giese, H., Hildebrandt, S., Lambers, L.: Bridging the Gap Between Formal Semantics and Implementation of Triple Graph Grammars - Ensuring Conformance of Relational Model Transformation Specifications and Implementations. Software and Systems Modeling (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Golas, U., Lambers, L., Ehrig, H., Giese, H.: Toward Bridging the Gap between Formal Foundations and Current Practice for Triple Graph Grammars. In: Ehrig, H., Engels, G., Kreowski, H.-J., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) ICGT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7562, pp. 141–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Habel, A., Pennemann, K.H.: Correctness of high-level transformation systems relative to nested conditions. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 19, 1–52 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Ehrig, H., Golas, U., Habel, A., Lambers, L., Orejas, F.: M-adhesive transformation systems with nested application conditions, part 1: Parallelism, concurrency and amalgamation. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science (to appear, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Habel, A., Heckel, R., Taentzer, G.: Graph Grammars with Negative Application Conditions. Fundamenta Informaticae 26(3/4), 287–313 (1996)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Ehrig, H., Ehrig, K., Prange, U., Taentzer, G.: Fundamentals of Algebraic Graph Transformation. Springer (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ermel, C., Gall, J., Lambers, L., Taentzer, G.: Modeling with Plausibility Checking: Inspecting Favorable and Critical Signs for Consistency between Control Flow and Functional Behavior. In: Giannakopoulou, D., Orejas, F. (eds.) FASE 2011. LNCS, vol. 6603, pp. 156–170. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Pennemann, K.H.: Development of Correct Graph Transformation Systems. PhD thesis, Department of Computing Science, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Charpentier, M.: Composing Invariants. In: Araki, K., Gnesi, S., Mandrioli, D. (eds.) FME 2003. LNCS, vol. 2805, pp. 401–421. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Ehrig, H., Habel, A., Lambers, L.: Parallelism and Concurrency Theorems for Rules with Nested Application Conditions. In: Festschrift dedicated to Hans-Jorg Kreowski at the Occasion of his 60th Birthday. EC-EASST, vol. 26 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lambers, L.: Certifying Rule-Based Models using Graph Transformation. PhD thesis, Technische Universität Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Orejas, F., Ehrig, H., Prange, U.: A Logic of Graph Constraints. In: Fiadeiro, J.L., Inverardi, P. (eds.) FASE 2008. LNCS, vol. 4961, pp. 179–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Blume, C., Bruggink, H.S., König, B.: Recognizable Graph Languages for Checking Invariants. In: Proc. of GT-VMT 2010 (Workshop on Graph Transformation and Visual Modeling Techniques). Electronic Communications of the EASST, vol. 29 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cabot, J., Clarisó, R., Guerra, E., Lara, J.: Verification and validation of declarative model-to-model transformations through invariants. J. Syst. Softw. 83(2), 283–302 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Frias, M.F., Galeotti, J.P., Pombo, C.L., Aguirre, N.: DynAlloy: Upgrading Alloy with actions. In: Proc. of Int. Conf. of Software Engineering, pp. 442–451. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Giese, H., Lambers, L. (2012). Towards Automatic Verification of Behavior Preservation for Model Transformation via Invariant Checking. In: Ehrig, H., Engels, G., Kreowski, HJ., Rozenberg, G. (eds) Graph Transformations. ICGT 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7562. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33654-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33654-6_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33653-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33654-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics