Abstract
The opening of data is considered to provide many benefits. However, opening up data by public bodies is a complex and ill-understood activity. Although many public bodies might be willing to open up their data, they lack any systematic guidance. In this paper, guidance is provided by investigating the publishing processes at the Dutch Research and Documentation Centre (WODC), which owns governmental judicial research data. We developed guidance by providing 1) a list of issues that play a role in deciding whether to open data, 2) an alternative to completely publishing data (i.e. restricted access) and 3) solutions for overcoming some of the issues. The latter include dealing with privacy-sensitive data, deletion policies, publishing after embargo periods instead of not publishing at all, adding related documents and adding information about the quality and completeness of datasets. The institutional context should be taken into account when using the guidance, as opening data requires considerable changes of organizations.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
References
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Transparency_and_Open_Government
European_Commission: Digital agenda: Turning government data into gold (2011)
Zhang, J., Dawes, S.S., Sarkis, J.: Exploring stakeholders’ expectations of the benefits and barriers of e-government knowledge sharing. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 18, 548–567 (2005)
Charalabidis, Y., Ntanos, E., Lampathaki, F.: An architectural framework for open governmental data for researchers and citizens. In: Janssen, M., Macintosh, A., Scholl, J., Tambouris, E., Wimmer, M., Bruijn, H.d., Tan, Y.H. (eds.) Electronic government and electronic participation joint proceedings of ongoing research and projects of IFIP EGOV and ePart 2011, Delft, pp. 77–85 (2011)
Blakemore, M., Craglia, M.: Access to Public-Sector Information in Europe: Policy, rights and obligations. The Information Society 22, 13–24 (2006)
http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/rules/eu/index_en.htm
Geiger, C.P., Lucke, J.v.: Open Government Data. Free accessible data of the public sector. In: Parycek, P., Kripp, M.J., Edelmann, N. (eds.) Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM 2011), Danube University Krems, Austria, pp. 183–194 (2011)
Boulton, G., Rawlins, M., Vallance, P., Walport, M.: Science as a public enterprise: the case for open data. The Lancet 377, 1633–1635 (2011)
Kalidien, S., Choenni, S., Meijer, R.: Crime statistics online: potentials and challenges. In: Chun, S.A., Sandoval, R., Philpot, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference on Public Administration Online: Challenges and Opportunities, pp. 131–137. Digital Government Society of North America, Puebla (2010)
Kalampokis, E., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K.: Open Government Data: A Stage Model. In: Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J., Wimmer, M.A., Tan, Y.-h. (eds.) EGOV 2011. LNCS, vol. 6846, pp. 235–246. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Pollard, P.: Opening up government data: making the case. European Public Sector Information Platform (2011)
Wahid, F.: Explaining History of eGovernment Implementation in Developing Countries: An Analytical Framework. In: Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J., Wimmer, M.A., Tan, Y.-h. (eds.) EGOV 2011. LNCS, vol. 6846, pp. 38–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Lampathaki, F., Charalabidis, Y., Sarantis, D., Koussouris, S., Askounis, D.: E-Government Services Composition Using Multi-faceted Metadata Classification Structures. In: Wimmer, M.A., Scholl, J., Grönlund, Å. (eds.) EGOV. LNCS, vol. 4656, pp. 116–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Avgerou, C.: IT and organizational change: an institutionalist perspective. Information Technology and People 13, 234–262 (2000)
Hassan, S., Gil-Garcia, J.R.: Institutional Theory and E-Government Research. In: Garson, G.D., Khosrow-Pour, M. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Public Information Technology, pp. 349–360. Information Science Reference, London (2008)
Phang, C.W., Kankanhalli, A., Ang, C.: Investigating Organizational Learning in eGovernment Projects: A Multi-Theoretic Approach. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 99–123 (2008)
Meyer, J.W., Rowan, B.: Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology 83, 340–363 (1977)
Scott, W.R.: Institutional Theory: Contributing to a Theoretical Research Program (2004)
Orlikowski, W.J., Barley, S.R.: Technology and institutions: what can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Quarterly 25, 145–166 (2001)
Winter, H.B., de Jong, P.O., Sibma, A., Visser, F.W., Herweijer, M., Klingenberg, A.M., Prakken, H.: Wat niet weet, wat niet deert. Een evaluatieonderzoek naar de werking van de Wet bescherming persoonsgegevens in de praktijk. Pro Facto, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, De Jong Beleidsadvies, WODC, Groningen (2008)
Buruma, Y.: Het recht op vergetelheid. Politiële en justitiële gegevens in de digitale wereld. In: Broeders, D., Cuijpers, C., Prins, J.E.J. (eds.) De Staat van Informatie, WRR/AUP, vol. 25, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam (2011)
Faerman, S.R., McCaffrey, D.P., Slyke, D.M.V.: Understanding interorganizational cooperation: public-private collaboration in regulating financial market innovation. Organization Science 12, 372–388 (2001)
Edmiston, K.D.: State and local e-government: prospects and challenges. American Review of Public Administration 33, 20–45 (2003)
Dawes, S.S.: Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 15, 377–394 (1996)
van den Braak, S.W., Choenni, S., Meijer, R., Zuiderwijk, A.: Trusted third parties for secure and privacy-preserving data integration and sharing in the public sector. In: Luna-Reyes, L.F., Mellouli, S. (eds.) 13th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. ACM, University of Maryland, USA (2012)
Zuiderwijk, A.M.G., Jeffery, K.G., Janssen, M.F.W.H.A.: The necessity of metadata for open linked data and its contribution to policy analyses. In: Edelmann, P.P.N. (ed.) Conference on E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM 2012), pp. 281–294. Danube-University Krems, Krems (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Meijer, R., Choenni, S., Charalabidis, Y., Jeffery, K. (2012). Issues and Guiding Principles for Opening Governmental Judicial Research Data. In: Scholl, H.J., Janssen, M., Wimmer, M.A., Moe, C.E., Flak, L.S. (eds) Electronic Government. EGOV 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7443. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33489-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33489-4_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33488-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33489-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)