Abstract
In the Social Semantic Web an organization, a brand, the name of a high-profile executive, or a particular product can be defined as the hodgepodge of all online conversations taking place around it, and this is happening regardless of whether or not an organization participates in the conversationscape’s dialogue. Long story short, organizations in the first place are forced to listen to the Social Web so in order to take part in and, in this way, improve their online reputation. To do that intuitively, the FORA framework is conceptualized as a pertinent listening application. So, the term FORA originates from the plural form of forum, the Latin word for marketplaces (Portmann, Nguyen, Sepulveda, & Cheok, 2012). Thus, the framework allows organizations’ communication operatives a fuzzy exploration of reputation in online marketplaces. Listening and then increasing engagement within social media elements is a hard task. There is a constant flow of information and many organizations do not know how to harness and gain actionable insights from this rich source of customer conversations. The idea beyond the conceptualization of the framework is to listen and in doing so automatically identify key social media elements 24/7 to simplify online reputation analysis and, by that, impart onto communication operatives insightful information on which they can actually act upon. To make this system reality, a design science approach is pursued.
“Wisdom is knowing what to do next; virtue is doing it.”
—David Starr Jordan
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baeza-Yates, R., Ribeiro-Neto, B., & Maarek, Y. (2011). Web retrieval. In R. Baeza-Yates & B. Ribeiro-Neto (Eds.), Modern Information Retrieval: The concepts and technology behind search (2nd ed., pp. 447–514). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Baeza-Yates, R., Ribeiro-Neto, B., & Navarro, G. (2011). Queries: Language & properties. In R. Baeza-Yates & B. Ribeiro-Neto (Eds.), Modern information retrieval: The concepts and technology behind search (2nd ed., pp. 255–279). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Bezdek, J. C. (1981). Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms (1st ed.). New York: Plenum Press.
Bishop, C. M. (2007). Pattern recognition and machine learning. Berlin: Springer.
Bondi, A. B. (2000). Characteristics of scalability and their impact on performance. In ACM (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on software and performance. Ontario, Canada/New York: ACM.
Bourke, P. (1997). Intersection of two circles [Online]. Accessed August 26, 2011, from http://paulbourke.net/geometry/2circle/.
Budura, A., Michel, A., Cudré-Mauroux, P., & Aberer, K. (2009). Neighborhood-based tag prediction. In Proceedings of the 6th European semantic web conference on the semantic web: Research and applications. Heraklion, Crete, Greece: Springer.
Burkhard, P. (2011). Benutzerfreundlichkeit ausgewählter Wissensrepräsentationssysteme im Sozialen Semantischen Web. Bachelor thesis, Fribourg: University of Fribourg.
de Oliveira, J. V., & Pedrycz, W. (2007). Advances in fuzzy clustering and its applications. West Sussex: Wiley.
Dey, A. K., & Abowd, G. D. (2000). Towards a better understanding of context and context-awareness. In CHI 2000 workshop on the what, who, where, when, and how of context-awareness. Hague.
Dey, A. K., Abowd, G. D., & Salber, D. (2001). A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications. Human Computer Interaction, 16, 97–166.
Fu, L., & Medico, E. (2007). FLAME, a novel fuzzy clustering method for the analysis of DNA microarray data. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 3.
Goldreich, O. (2008). Computational complexity: A conceptual perspective (1st ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hächler, L. (2010). Web 2.0 and 3.0: How Online Journalists Find Relevant and Credible Information. Master thesis, Fribourg: University of Fribourg, Departement of Informatics.
Hassan-Montero, Y., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2006). Improving tag-clouds as visual information retrieval interfaces. In International conference on multidisciplinary information sciences and technologies. MĂ©rida, Spain.
Hay, D. C. (2002). Requirements analysis: From business views to architecture. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Hearst, M. (2011). User interfaces for search. In R. Baeza-Yates & B. Ribeiro-Neto (Eds.), Modern information retrieval: The concepts and technology behind search (2nd ed., pp. 21–55). Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.
Herczeg, M. (2009). Software-Ergonomie: Theorien, Modelle und Kriterien fĂĽr gebrauchstaugliche interaktive Computersysteme (3rd ed.). Oldenbourg: Wissenschaftsverlag.
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.
Kaser, O., & Lemire, D. (2007). Tag-cloud drawing: Algorithms for cloud visualization. In WWW2007 Workshop on tagging and metadata for social information organization. Banff, Alberta.
Kaufmann, E. (2007). Talking to the semantic web. Dissertation, Zurich: University of Zurich, Department of Informatics Institut for Informatik.
Kaufmann, M., & Meier, A. (2009). An inductive fuzzy classification approach applied to individual marketing. In The 28th North American fuzzy information processing society annual conference. Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Kolly, S. (2011). Entwicklung einer unscharfen Ontologie fĂĽr das Semantische Web. Bachelor thesis, Fribourg: University of Fribourg, Departement of Informatics.
Lämmel, U., & Cleve, J. (2008). Künstliche Intelligenz (3rd ed.). München: Carl Hanser Verlag.
Lewandowski, D. (2005). Web Information Retrieval: Technologien zur Informationssuche im Internet. DĂĽsseldorf: Deutsche Gesellschaft f. Informationswissenschaft u. Informationspraxis.
Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & SchĂĽtze, H. (2008). Introduction to information retrieval. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousan Oaks: Sage.
Miyamoto, S., Ichihashi, H., & Honda, K. (2008). Algorithms for fuzzy clustering. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
Osswald, M. (2011). Unscharfe, kontextbewusste Ontologien im Social Web. Bachelor thesis, Fribourg: University of Fribourg, Departement of Informatics.
Pellegrini, T., & Blumauer, A. (2006). Semantic Web und semantische Technologien: Zentrale Begriffe und Unterscheidungen. In T. Pellegrini & A. Blumauer (Eds.), Semantic Web: Wege zur vernetzten Wissensgesellschaft (1st ed., pp. 9–26). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Pepper, S. (2010). Ontopedia [Online]. Accessed August 4, 2011, from http://www.ontopedia.net/pepper/papers/ELIS-TopicMaps.pdf.
Pitts, A. (2009). Topic maps martian notation [Online]. Accessed October 11, 2011, from http://www.musicdna.info/TMMN/.
Portmann, E. (2009). Weblog extraction with fuzzy classification methods. In 2nd international conference on the applications of digital information and web technologies. London: IEEE.
Portmann, E. (2011a). A fuzzy grassroots ontology for improving social semantic web search. In De Baets B, Mesiar R, & Troiano L, (Eds.). Proceedings of 6th international summer school on aggregation operators. Benevento.
Portmann, E., & Kuhn, A. (2010). Extraktion und kartographische Visualisierung von Informationen aus Weblogs. In U. Hengartner & A. Meier (Eds.), Web 3.0 & semantic web (pp. 81–90). Heidelberg: HMD – Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik.
Portmann, E., & Meier, A. (2010). A fuzzy grassroots ontology for improving weblog extraction. Journal of Digital Information Management, 8(4), 276–284.
Portmann, E., Nguyen, T., Sepulveda, J., & Cheok, A. D. (2012). Fuzzy online reputation analysis framework. In A. Meier & L. Donze (Eds.), Fuzzy methods for customer relationship management and marketing: Applications and classification (pp. 139–167). Hershey: IGI Global.
Saeed, J. I. (2008). Semantics (3rd ed.). West Sussex: Wiley.
Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tiwari, S. (2011). Professional NoSQL (1st ed.). Indianapolis: Wiley.
Vaishnavi, V., & Kuechler, B. (2009). Design research in information systems [Online]. Accessed August 26, 2011, from http://desrist.org/design-research-in-information-systems/.
van Harmelen, F., Lifschitz, V., & Porter, B. (2007). Handbook of knowledge representation. New York: Elsevier.
Zadeh, L. (2010). BISC: The Berkeley Initiative in Soft Computing [Online]. UC Berkeley Accessed August 26, 2011, from http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~zadeh/presentations%202008/SSSC%2710-Full%20version-Precisiation%20of%20Meaning-July26.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Portmann, E. (2013). Fuzzy Online Reputation Analysis Framework. In: The FORA Framework. Fuzzy Management Methods. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33233-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33233-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33232-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33233-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)