Skip to main content

Keypoint Detection Based on the Unimodality Test of HOGs

  • Conference paper
Advances in Visual Computing (ISVC 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 7431))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present a new method for keypoint detection. The main drawback of existing methods is their lack of robustness to image distortions. Small variations of the image lead to big differences in keypoint localizations.

The present work shows a way of determining singular points in an image using histograms of oriented gradients (HOGs). Although HOGs are commonly used as keypoint descriptors, they have not been used in the detection stage before. We show that the unimodality of HOGs can be used as a measure of significance of the interest points. We show that keypoints detected using HOGs present higher robustness to image distortions, and we compare the results with existing methods, using the repeatability criterion.

This research was partially supported by Consolider Ingenio 2010, project (CSD2007-00018) and CICYT project DPI2010-17112.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lowe, D.G.: Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. VisionĀ 60, 91ā€“110 (2004)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Ke, Y., Sukthankar, R.: PCA-SIFT: A More Distinctive Representation for Local Image Descriptors. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol.Ā 2, pp. 506ā€“513 (2004)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Bay, H.: From Wide-baseline Point and Line Correspondences to 3D. PhD thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (2006)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Mikolajczyk, K., Schmid, C.: A performance evaluation of local descriptors. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine IntelligenceĀ 27, 1615ā€“1630 (2005)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Dalal, N., Triggs, B.: Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2005, vol.Ā 1, pp. 886ā€“893 (2005)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Felzenszwalb, P., Girshick, R., McAllester, D., Ramanan, D.: Object detection with discriminatively trained part-based models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine IntelligenceĀ 32, 1627ā€“1645 (2010)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Moravec, H.P.: Obstacle avoidance and navigation in the real world by a seeing robot rover. PhD thesis, Stanford, CA, USA, AAI8024717 (1980)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Beaudet, P.R.: Rotationally invariant image operators. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol.Ā 579, pp. 579ā€“583 (1978)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Harris, C., Stephens, M.I.: A combined corner and edge detector, Manchester, UK, vol.Ā 15, pp. 147ā€“151 (1988)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Smith, S.M., Brady, J.M.: SUSAN - a new approach to low level image processing. Int. Journal of Computer VisionĀ 23, 45ā€“78 (1997)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Mikolajczyk, K., Schmid, C.: Indexing based on scale invariant interest points. In: Proceedings of Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2001, vol.Ā 1, pp. 525ā€“531 (2001)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Mikolajczyk, K., Schmid, C.: Scale and Affine Invariant Interest Point Detectors. International Journal of Computer VisionĀ 1, 63ā€“86 (2004)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  13. Rosten, E., Porter, R., Drummond, T.: Faster and better: A machine learning approach to corner detection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine IntelligenceĀ 32, 105ā€“119 (2010)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Lowe, D.G.: Object Recognition from Local Scale-Invariant Features. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, vol.Ā 2, pp. 1150ā€“1157 (1999)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  15. Schmid, C., Mohr, R., Bauckhage, C.: Evaluation of Interest Point Detectors. International Journal of Computer VisionĀ 37, 151ā€“172 (2000)

    ArticleĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Porikli, F.: Integral histogram: A fast way to extract histograms in cartesian spaces. In: Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 829ā€“836 (2005)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Hartigan, J.A., Hartigan, P.M.: The dip test of unimodality. The Annals of StatisticsĀ 13, 70ā€“84 (1985)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Hellwig, B., Hengstler, J., Schmidt, M., Gehrmann, M., Schormann, W., Rahnenfuhrer, J.: Comparison of scores for bimodality of gene expression distributions and genome-wide evaluation of the prognostic relevance of high-scoring genes. BMC BioinformaticsĀ 11, 276 (2010)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  19. DeCarlo, L.T.: On the meaning and use of kurtosis. Psychological MethodsĀ 2, 292ā€“307 (1997)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  20. Wang, J., Wen, S., Symmans, W.F., Pusztai, L., Coombes, K.R.: The bimodality index: a criterion for discovering and ranking bimodal signatures from cancer gene expression profiling data. Cancer InformaticsĀ 7, 199ā€“216 (2009)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  21. Wolfe, J.H.: Pattern Clustering by Multivariate Mixture Analysis. Multivariate Behavioral ResearchĀ 5, 329ā€“350 (1970)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  22. Hartigan, P.M.: Algorithm as 217: Computation of the dip statistic to test for unimodality. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics)Ā 34, 320ā€“325 (1985)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  23. Vachier, C., Meyer, F.: Extinction value: a new measurement of persistence. In: IEEE Workshop on Nonlinear Signal and Image Processing, vol.Ā 1, pp. 254ā€“257 (1995)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  24. Schmid, C., Mohr, R., Bauckhage, C.: Comparing and evaluating interest points. In: Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 230ā€“235 (1998)

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

CataƱo, M.A., Climent, J. (2012). Keypoint Detection Based on the Unimodality Test of HOGs. In: Bebis, G., et al. Advances in Visual Computing. ISVC 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7431. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33179-4_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33179-4_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33178-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33179-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics